International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asia Europe Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s10308-024-00701-4
Tran Thi Thuy Duong
{"title":"International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks","authors":"Tran Thi Thuy Duong","doi":"10.1007/s10308-024-00701-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The fragmentation of international law is a long-standing issue. However, it continues to be a topic of debate. While investigating this phenomenon, specifically the relation between international labor law and trade law, the author addresses the following questions: How does the fragmentation between these two regimes appear? What are the benefits and challenges associated with this fragmentation? Recently, with the rise of new-generation free trade agreements (FTAs), there has been a trend toward incorporating labor rules into the international trade law regime. By analyzing and comparing the “Trade and Sustainable Development” chapters of two European Union (EU) FTAs, the EU-Korea FTA and the EU-Vietnam FTA, the author explores whether this incorporation effectively reduces the fragmentation of international law and its negative impacts. The author argues that while it may seem beneficial, this partial incorporation may exacerbate the fragmentation of international law. In particular, the universality and inalienability of labor rights as human rights are not adequately protected. Moreover, the adverse effects of the fragmentation of international law remain unresolved. Therefore, although incorporating labor articles into FTAs is a step in the right direction, more coherent measures are essential to address the challenges caused by the fragmentation of international law.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"22 3","pages":"293 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-024-00701-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fragmentation of international law is a long-standing issue. However, it continues to be a topic of debate. While investigating this phenomenon, specifically the relation between international labor law and trade law, the author addresses the following questions: How does the fragmentation between these two regimes appear? What are the benefits and challenges associated with this fragmentation? Recently, with the rise of new-generation free trade agreements (FTAs), there has been a trend toward incorporating labor rules into the international trade law regime. By analyzing and comparing the “Trade and Sustainable Development” chapters of two European Union (EU) FTAs, the EU-Korea FTA and the EU-Vietnam FTA, the author explores whether this incorporation effectively reduces the fragmentation of international law and its negative impacts. The author argues that while it may seem beneficial, this partial incorporation may exacerbate the fragmentation of international law. In particular, the universality and inalienability of labor rights as human rights are not adequately protected. Moreover, the adverse effects of the fragmentation of international law remain unresolved. Therefore, although incorporating labor articles into FTAs is a step in the right direction, more coherent measures are essential to address the challenges caused by the fragmentation of international law.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法:从分散到整合?对多边和区域贸易法框架中国际贸易法与国际劳动法之间关系的分析
国际法不成体系是一个由来已久的问题。然而,它仍然是一个争论不休的话题。在研究这一现象,特别是国际劳动法与贸易法之间关系的同时,作者探讨了以下问题:这两种制度之间的割裂是如何出现的?这种割裂的好处和挑战是什么?近来,随着新一代自由贸易协定(FTA)的兴起,将劳工规则纳入国际贸易法体系已成为一种趋势。通过分析和比较欧盟(EU)的两个自由贸易协定(欧盟-韩国自由贸易协定和欧盟-越南自由贸易协定)中的 "贸易与可持续发展 "章节,作者探讨了这种纳入是否有效地减少了国际法的碎片化及其负面影响。作者认为,这种部分纳入看似有益,但可能会加剧国际法的不成体系。特别是,劳动权作为人权的普遍性和不可剥夺性没有得到充分保护。此外,国际法不成体系的不利影响仍未得到解决。因此,尽管将劳工条款纳入自贸协定是朝着正确方向迈出的一步,但要应对国际法不成体系带来的挑战,必须采取更加协调一致的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
期刊最新文献
Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations Informing macrologistics connectivity in emerging economies through a triangulated research approach: the case of Uzbekistan Correction: The regime complex for digital trade in Asia and China’s engagement Paradiplomacy and international conflict: disengagement from China by Swedish local governments International law: from fragmentation to integration? an analysis of the relationship between international trade law and international labor law in multilateral and regional trade law frameworks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1