Evaluating culture-free targeted next-generation sequencing for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre clinical study of two end-to-end commercial workflows

IF 36.4 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00586-3
Rebecca E Colman, Marva Seifert, Andres De la Rossa, Sophia B Georghiou, Christine Hoogland, Swapna Uplekar, Sacha Laurent, Camilla Rodrigues, Priti Kambli, Nestani Tukvadze, Nino Maghradze, Shaheed V Omar, Lavania Joseph, Anita Suresh, Timothy C Rodwell
{"title":"Evaluating culture-free targeted next-generation sequencing for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre clinical study of two end-to-end commercial workflows","authors":"Rebecca E Colman, Marva Seifert, Andres De la Rossa, Sophia B Georghiou, Christine Hoogland, Swapna Uplekar, Sacha Laurent, Camilla Rodrigues, Priti Kambli, Nestani Tukvadze, Nino Maghradze, Shaheed V Omar, Lavania Joseph, Anita Suresh, Timothy C Rodwell","doi":"10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00586-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major obstacle in ending the global tuberculosis epidemic. Deployment of molecular tools for comprehensive drug resistance profiling is imperative for successful detection and characterisation of tuberculosis drug resistance. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new class of molecular diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis.<h3>Methods</h3>We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre clinical evaluation of the performance of two targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) assays for drug-resistant tuberculosis at reference laboratories in three countries (Georgia, India, and South Africa) to assess diagnostic accuracy and index test failure rates. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with molecularly confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, and at risk for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Sensitivity and specificity for both tNGS index tests (GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB and Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test) were calculated for rifampicin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin), second line-injectables (amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin), pyrazinamide, bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, ethambutol, and streptomycin against a composite reference standard of phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing.<h3>Findings</h3>Between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 832 individuals were invited to participate in the study, of whom 720 were included in the final analysis (212, 376, and 132 participants in Georgia, India, and South Africa, respectively). Of 720 clinical sediment samples evaluated, 658 (91%) and 684 (95%) produced complete or partial results on the GenoScreen and ONT tNGS workflows, respectively, with 593 (96%) and 603 (98%) of 616 smear-positive samples producing tNGS sequence data. Both workflows had sensitivities and specificities of more than 95% for rifampicin and isoniazid, and high accuracy for fluoroquinolones (sensitivity approximately ≥94%) and second line-injectables (sensitivity 80%) compared with the composite reference standard. Importantly, these assays also detected mutations associated with resistance to critical new and repurposed drugs (bedaquiline, linezolid) not currently detectable by any other WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics on the market. We note that the current format of assays have low sensitivity (≤50%) for linezolid and more work on mutations associated with drug resistance is needed.<h3>Interpretation</h3>This multicentre evaluation demonstrates that culture-free tNGS can provide accurate sequencing results for detection and characterisation of drug resistance from <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> clinical sediment samples for timely, comprehensive profiling of drug-resistant tuberculosis.<h3>Funding</h3>Unitaid.","PeriodicalId":49923,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(24)00586-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Drug-resistant tuberculosis remains a major obstacle in ending the global tuberculosis epidemic. Deployment of molecular tools for comprehensive drug resistance profiling is imperative for successful detection and characterisation of tuberculosis drug resistance. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a new class of molecular diagnostics for drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre clinical evaluation of the performance of two targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) assays for drug-resistant tuberculosis at reference laboratories in three countries (Georgia, India, and South Africa) to assess diagnostic accuracy and index test failure rates. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with molecularly confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis, and at risk for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Sensitivity and specificity for both tNGS index tests (GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB and Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test) were calculated for rifampicin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones (moxifloxacin, levofloxacin), second line-injectables (amikacin, kanamycin, capreomycin), pyrazinamide, bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine, ethambutol, and streptomycin against a composite reference standard of phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing.

Findings

Between April 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 832 individuals were invited to participate in the study, of whom 720 were included in the final analysis (212, 376, and 132 participants in Georgia, India, and South Africa, respectively). Of 720 clinical sediment samples evaluated, 658 (91%) and 684 (95%) produced complete or partial results on the GenoScreen and ONT tNGS workflows, respectively, with 593 (96%) and 603 (98%) of 616 smear-positive samples producing tNGS sequence data. Both workflows had sensitivities and specificities of more than 95% for rifampicin and isoniazid, and high accuracy for fluoroquinolones (sensitivity approximately ≥94%) and second line-injectables (sensitivity 80%) compared with the composite reference standard. Importantly, these assays also detected mutations associated with resistance to critical new and repurposed drugs (bedaquiline, linezolid) not currently detectable by any other WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics on the market. We note that the current format of assays have low sensitivity (≤50%) for linezolid and more work on mutations associated with drug resistance is needed.

Interpretation

This multicentre evaluation demonstrates that culture-free tNGS can provide accurate sequencing results for detection and characterisation of drug resistance from Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical sediment samples for timely, comprehensive profiling of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Funding

Unitaid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于诊断耐药结核病的无培养靶向新一代测序:对两种端到端商业工作流程的多中心临床研究
背景耐药性结核病仍然是结束全球结核病流行的主要障碍。要成功检测结核病耐药性并确定其特征,就必须部署分子工具来进行全面的耐药性分析。我们在三个国家(格鲁吉亚、印度和南非)的参考实验室开展了一项前瞻性、横断面、多中心临床评估,对两种耐药结核病靶向新一代测序 (tNGS) 检测方法的性能进行了评估,以评估诊断准确性和指标检测失败率。符合条件的参与者年龄在 18 岁或 18 岁以上,患有经分子确诊的肺结核,并面临耐利福平结核病的风险。对利福平、异烟肼、氟喹诺酮类药物(莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星)、二线注射剂(氨苄西林、阿米卡星)、三线注射剂(阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星)的 tNGS 指数检测(GenoScreen Deeplex Myc-TB 和 Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT] Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Test)的灵敏度和特异性进行了计算、二线注射剂(阿米卡星、卡那霉素、卡波霉素)、吡嗪酰胺、贝达喹啉、利奈唑烷、氯法齐明、乙胺丁醇和链霉素的耐药性测试结果与表型药敏测试和全基因组测序的综合参考标准进行了对比计算。研究结果2021年4月1日至2022年6月30日期间,共有832人受邀参加研究,其中720人被纳入最终分析(格鲁吉亚、印度和南非分别有212人、376人和132人参加)。在评估的 720 份临床沉淀物样本中,分别有 658 份(91%)和 684 份(95%)在 GenoScreen 和 ONT tNGS 工作流程中得出了完整或部分结果,其中 616 份涂片阳性样本中分别有 593 份(96%)和 603 份(98%)得出了 tNGS 序列数据。与复合参考标准相比,这两种工作流程对利福平和异烟肼的敏感性和特异性均超过 95%,对氟喹诺酮类(敏感性约≥94%)和二线注射剂(敏感性 80%)的准确性也很高。重要的是,这些检测方法还能检测到目前市场上任何其他世卫组织推荐的快速诊断方法无法检测到的与关键新药和再利用药物(贝达喹啉、利奈唑烷)耐药性相关的突变。我们注意到,目前的检测方法对利奈唑胺的灵敏度较低(≤50%),需要对与耐药性相关的突变开展更多工作。这项多中心评估表明,无培养 tNGS 可以提供准确的测序结果,用于检测结核分枝杆菌临床沉积物样本的耐药性并确定其特征,从而及时、全面地分析耐药性结核病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Infectious Diseases
Lancet Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
60.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
1064
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Infectious Diseases was launched in August, 2001, and is a lively monthly journal of original research, review, opinion, and news covering international issues relevant to clinical infectious diseases specialists worldwide.The infectious diseases journal aims to be a world-leading publication, featuring original research that advocates change or sheds light on clinical practices related to infectious diseases. The journal prioritizes articles with the potential to impact clinical practice or influence perspectives. Content covers a wide range of topics, including anti-infective therapy and immunization, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, emerging infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, mycobacterial infections, infection control, infectious diseases epidemiology, neglected tropical diseases, and travel medicine. Informative reviews on any subject linked to infectious diseases and human health are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Learning from AIDS for NCD control Spreading awareness about HIV transmission Monkeypox virus isolation from longitudinal samples in 11 hospitalised patients Mortality in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis Estimating mortality in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1