Autistic psychiatrists' experiences of recognising themselves and others as autistic: a qualitative study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.756
Mary Doherty, Nick Chown, Nicola Martin, Sebastian C K Shaw
{"title":"Autistic psychiatrists' experiences of recognising themselves and others as autistic: a qualitative study.","authors":"Mary Doherty, Nick Chown, Nicola Martin, Sebastian C K Shaw","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of autism falls under the remit of psychiatry. Recognition that psychiatrists could be autistic is recent. Psychiatrists are the second largest specialty group in Autistic Doctors International, a peer support group for autistic doctors.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the experiences of autistic psychiatrists in relation to recognising themselves and others as autistic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a qualitative study using loosely structured interviews and an interpretive phenomenological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight autistic senior psychiatrists based in the UK participated. One had a childhood diagnosis, two had been diagnosed in adulthood and the remainder self-identified as autistic as adults. Recognition of autism followed diagnosis of their children or encounters with autistic patients. Barriers to self-recognition included lack of autism training, the deficit-based diagnostic criteria and stereotypical views of autism. Recognising that they were autistic led to the realisation that many colleagues were also likely to be autistic, particularly in neurodevelopmental psychiatry. All participants reported the ability to quickly recognise autistic patients and to develop a good rapport easily, once they were aware of their own autistic identity. Difficulties recognising patients as autistic occurred before self-recognition when they shared autistic characteristics and experiences. 'If we don't recognise ourselves as autistic how on earth can we diagnose patients accurately?'</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autistic psychiatrists face multiple barriers to recognising that they are autistic. Lack of self-recognition may impede diagnostic accuracy with autistic patients. Self-recognition and disclosure by autistic psychiatrists may be facilitated by reframing the traditional deficit-based view of autism towards a neurodiversity-affirmative approach, with consequent benefits for autistic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 6","pages":"e183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.756","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of autism falls under the remit of psychiatry. Recognition that psychiatrists could be autistic is recent. Psychiatrists are the second largest specialty group in Autistic Doctors International, a peer support group for autistic doctors.

Aims: To explore the experiences of autistic psychiatrists in relation to recognising themselves and others as autistic.

Method: This was a qualitative study using loosely structured interviews and an interpretive phenomenological analysis.

Results: Eight autistic senior psychiatrists based in the UK participated. One had a childhood diagnosis, two had been diagnosed in adulthood and the remainder self-identified as autistic as adults. Recognition of autism followed diagnosis of their children or encounters with autistic patients. Barriers to self-recognition included lack of autism training, the deficit-based diagnostic criteria and stereotypical views of autism. Recognising that they were autistic led to the realisation that many colleagues were also likely to be autistic, particularly in neurodevelopmental psychiatry. All participants reported the ability to quickly recognise autistic patients and to develop a good rapport easily, once they were aware of their own autistic identity. Difficulties recognising patients as autistic occurred before self-recognition when they shared autistic characteristics and experiences. 'If we don't recognise ourselves as autistic how on earth can we diagnose patients accurately?'

Conclusions: Autistic psychiatrists face multiple barriers to recognising that they are autistic. Lack of self-recognition may impede diagnostic accuracy with autistic patients. Self-recognition and disclosure by autistic psychiatrists may be facilitated by reframing the traditional deficit-based view of autism towards a neurodiversity-affirmative approach, with consequent benefits for autistic patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症精神科医生认识到自己和他人患有自闭症的经历:一项定性研究。
背景:自闭症的诊断属于精神病学的职权范围。精神科医生也可能患有自闭症是最近才被认识到的。精神科医生是国际自闭症医生协会(一个自闭症医生同行支持团体)的第二大专业群体。目的:探讨自闭症精神科医生在认识到自己和他人患有自闭症方面的经验:这是一项定性研究,采用松散结构的访谈和解释性现象学分析:八名英国的资深自闭症精神科医生参与了这项研究。其中一人在童年时被诊断出患有自闭症,两人在成年后被诊断出患有自闭症,其余的人在成年后自我认定患有自闭症。对自闭症的认识源于其子女的诊断或与自闭症患者的接触。自我认知的障碍包括缺乏自闭症培训、基于缺陷的诊断标准以及对自闭症的刻板印象。认识到自己是自闭症患者后,很多同事也可能是自闭症患者,尤其是神经发育精神病学领域的同事。所有参与者都表示,一旦意识到自己的自闭症身份,他们就能迅速识别自闭症患者,并很容易建立良好的关系。当患者具有相同的自闭症特征和经历时,在自我识别之前就会出现识别患者为自闭症患者的困难。如果我们都不承认自己是自闭症患者,又怎么能准确诊断病人呢?自闭症精神科医生在承认自己是自闭症患者方面面临多重障碍。缺乏自我认知可能会影响对自闭症患者诊断的准确性。将传统的自闭症缺陷观点转变为肯定神经多样性的方法,可以促进自闭症精神科医生的自我认知和信息披露,从而为自闭症患者带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1