An online grief intervention to improve well-being and reduce clinical symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2024.2421629
Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Margarita Gabriela Albán-Terán, Emilia Gabriela Nieto Ramos, Emilia Nicole Villavicencio Calderón, Alisson Nicole Casa Leiva, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Paulina Arenas-Landgrave
{"title":"An online grief intervention to improve well-being and reduce clinical symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Alejandro Dominguez-Rodriguez, Paulina Erika Herdoiza-Arroyo, Sergio Sanz-Gómez, Margarita Gabriela Albán-Terán, Emilia Gabriela Nieto Ramos, Emilia Nicole Villavicencio Calderón, Alisson Nicole Casa Leiva, Anabel de la Rosa-Gómez, Paulina Arenas-Landgrave","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2024.2421629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the emotional impact of losing a loved one, deteriorating well-being, and increasing dysphoric symptoms in mourners. This study evaluated the efficacy of COVID Grief, a self-applied online cognitive-behavioral intervention for Mexican adults facing grief during the pandemic. We conducted a randomized clinical trial, enrolling 1,109 participants, 45 of whom completed the full intervention, and 69 of whom completed the waiting list control (WLC). Between-subject analysis showed that intervention group (IG) participants reported significantly higher satisfaction with life and quality of life and a reduction in depression, anxiety and stress levels compared to those in the WLC. Within-subjects analysis showed that IG presented no significant changes in satisfaction with life, whereas the quality of life was increased, and levels of depression, anxiety, and stress were reduced after treatment. For WLC, satisfaction with life and quality of life were significantly decreased, and symptoms of depression and anxiety -but not stress symptoms- increased after the waitlist. Completer's opinions of the treatment were highly positive, although they only represent 5% of participants who accessed the intervention. High dropout rates should be addressed in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2421629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the emotional impact of losing a loved one, deteriorating well-being, and increasing dysphoric symptoms in mourners. This study evaluated the efficacy of COVID Grief, a self-applied online cognitive-behavioral intervention for Mexican adults facing grief during the pandemic. We conducted a randomized clinical trial, enrolling 1,109 participants, 45 of whom completed the full intervention, and 69 of whom completed the waiting list control (WLC). Between-subject analysis showed that intervention group (IG) participants reported significantly higher satisfaction with life and quality of life and a reduction in depression, anxiety and stress levels compared to those in the WLC. Within-subjects analysis showed that IG presented no significant changes in satisfaction with life, whereas the quality of life was increased, and levels of depression, anxiety, and stress were reduced after treatment. For WLC, satisfaction with life and quality of life were significantly decreased, and symptoms of depression and anxiety -but not stress symptoms- increased after the waitlist. Completer's opinions of the treatment were highly positive, although they only represent 5% of participants who accessed the intervention. High dropout rates should be addressed in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高幸福感和减少临床症状的在线悲伤干预:随机对照试验。
COVID-19 大流行扩大了失去亲人的情感影响,恶化了哀悼者的幸福感,增加了他们的焦虑症状。本研究评估了 COVID Grief 的疗效,这是一种针对在大流行期间面临悲伤的墨西哥成年人的自我应用在线认知行为干预。我们进行了一项随机临床试验,共招募了 1,109 名参与者,其中 45 人完成了全部干预,69 人完成了等待名单对照(WLC)。主体间分析表明,干预组(IG)参与者对生活的满意度和生活质量明显高于候补对照组,抑郁、焦虑和压力水平也有所下降。主体内分析表明,干预组的生活满意度没有明显变化,而生活质量有所提高,抑郁、焦虑和压力水平在治疗后有所降低。对于 WLC 而言,生活满意度和生活质量明显下降,抑郁和焦虑症状在等待名单治疗后有所增加,但压力症状没有增加。完成者对治疗的评价非常积极,尽管他们只占接受干预的参与者的 5%。在今后的研究中,应关注高辍学率问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Perceived stress and death-related distress in older adults: Exploring the role of social support and emotional loneliness. Informal social support following bereavement: A scoping review of provider and recipient perspectives of helpful and unhelpful interactions. Death before birth: An encounter between Prenatal Pedagogy and the Pedagogy of Death. Cultural differences on baby loss experiences: A comparison of the US and New Zealand. Fathers' experiences of perinatal death following miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal death: A meta-ethnography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1