Dr James Rankin, a man ahead of his time

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Drug and alcohol review Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/dar.13966
Margaret Hamilton, Alex Wodak
{"title":"Dr James Rankin, a man ahead of his time","authors":"Margaret Hamilton,&nbsp;Alex Wodak","doi":"10.1111/dar.13966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Photo from https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin: Drs Jim Rankin (left) and Barry Firkin in the early 1960s. (https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin).</p><p><b>James Gerald D'Arcy Rankin,</b> MBBS DMedSci (Hon)/Doctor of Medical Science, (honoris causa), University of Sydney Emeritus Professor of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto.</p><p>Dr James (Jim) Rankin, a major leader in developing more effective prevention and treatment services for people with alcohol and other drug problems, died late in 2023 after a long and extraordinarily influential career.</p><p>Jim grew up in Sydney, graduating from medicine at The University of Sydney in 1954, and after training at St Vincent's and The Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals he worked as a physician at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney. Here he met Pat, then training to be a nurse and they married in 1957, beginning a 66-year partnership that included creating a family of 6 children, 15 grandchildren and 2 great granddaughters. Jim died only a few months after his wife Pat's death. This family aspect of Jim's life was as vital to him as his professional career.</p><p>In 1961, Jim took up a fellowship at Columbia University in New York for 2 years, pursuing research and clinical work on hepatic physiology and disease. On his return to Sydney, not finding a suitable clinical academic position for a gastroenterologist, he was encouraged by the Sisters of Charity to go to their sister hospital in Melbourne. There, Professor Carl de Gruchy, as Head of the Department of Medicine of the University of Melbourne at St Vincent's Hospital, was seeking a suitably qualified physician who might join with him to develop a response to alcohol-associated problems.</p><p>Jim Rankin had just the right mix of qualities—both professionally and personally—and was appointed as Second Assistant in that Department at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne in 1964, concurrently becoming Honorary Assistant Physician to Outpatients.</p><p>Rankin reflected that the alcohol field was an unpopular area medically and professionally at that time [<span>1</span>]. However, his interest in broad social and political perspectives together with his medical specialist experience and desire to pursue research made him an ideal manager to develop this, the first clinic for people with alcohol related problems within a large, public, general hospital in Australia.<sup>1</sup></p><p>The Alcoholism Clinic opened at St Vincent's in inner city Fitzroy<sup>2</sup> in 1964 [<span>2</span>]. It was a groundbreaking initiative, involving medical and psycho-social assessment and support services with embedded research, and designed to include both outpatient and inpatient (through consultation) services.<sup>3</sup></p><p>Dr Kerry Breen, one of the first medical registrars who worked with Jim Rankin in the early days of this clinic, devoted a chapter to the evolution of this Alcoholism Clinic's growth in his de Gruchy biography [<span>3</span>], pointing out: ‘This alcohol service had not arisen in a vacuum. Health problems caused by misuse of alcohol had gained some attention in the Australian medical literature in the 1950s. In 1952, Dr Eric Saint and colleagues had published a series of papers entitled “Studies on chronic alcoholism” in The Medical Journal of Australia<sup>4</sup>’.</p><p>Other medical specialists in Melbourne had identified alcohol use in the aetiology of medical problems. Breen notes ‘Dr John Cade (Snr.), psychiatrist superintendent at Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital (had noted in [<span>4</span>]) that some 35%–40% of the inpatients at his hospital were there as a consequence of alcohol misuse’. However, as Cade commented, ‘community effort directed to the prevention and treatment of alcoholism [had] been negligible’. In 1959, Dr Ian Mackay, working in the clinical research unit of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, had estimated the prevalence of alcoholism in Australia based on deaths from cirrhosis of the liver [<span>5</span>].</p><p>Police and corrections services also identified alcohol as a significant contributor to social disruption and crime. Alcohol-related offences were common among the inmates of Melbourne's Pentridge Prison; some with relatively short sentences under the <i>Vagrancy Act</i>, convicted of the informally titled offences of ‘drunk and disorderly’ and ‘with no lawful means of support’.<sup>5</sup></p><p>At the time Rankin was developing the Alcoholism Clinic, services for homeless men (later, also women) were evolving including St Vincent de Paul Society's Ozanam House from the 1950s<sup>6</sup> and the Salvation Army's Bridge Program, specifically for those needing alcohol-related rehabilitation.<sup>7</sup> Similarly, an independent organisation, using experience from the Fitzroy-based Brotherhood of St Lawrence researching and responding to poverty, initiated Hanover Welfare Services (taking the name from the Fitzroy Street where it was first located), in 1964. Parallel to Jim Rankin's commitment to research, they declared: ‘Much exact information is required as a basis for planning further work with the men. The methods of the agency should be regarded as experimental, and results evaluated and reported. Client's case records would be compiled so as to allow elucidation of common patterns, and special study might be made of such subjects as excessive drinking and employment difficulties’.</p><p>Recalling the very first clinic at St Vincent's, Rankin, when interviewed by Breen, recalled that the first (and only) patient of the clinic on the first day ‘was “Ray S.”, a homeless man with a long history of alcohol dependence, who was brought to the clinic from Pentridge Prison. Ray had been injured at around the time of his arrest and had been seen in the Casualty Department at St Vincent's, where a resident doctor had given him an appointment to the new clinic. If he had not been in prison, it is highly unlikely that Ray would have kept the appointment. From that first visit, Ray abstained from alcohol, and became a respected member of the community and a strong supporter of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)’ [<span>3</span>]. AA was to become an intrinsic part of every clinic and was offered (not insisted on) to all patients of the clinic for many years.</p><p>As the out-patient clinic grew, it began to hold three clinic sessions each week; two in the evenings, recognising the needs of people who could not get there during the day. Jim set up detailed patient data collection and, subsequently, an internal consultancy service to the rest of the hospital, insisting that all the hospital could and would be supported to consider and, where appropriate, treat or refer patients to the ‘Special Clinic’, the title adopted to avoid stigma.</p><p>The specialist focus provided an invaluable base of education for junior medical staff, and Jim's belief in teamwork meant including the social worker and the clinic nurse in all aspects of the Clinic's work, including consultancy and research; it encouraged consideration of broad assessment of the person's situation, beyond their biology and drinking history, and meetings with family members were initiated. Others he involved included the hospital dietician, Bev Wood, who would go on to complete a PhD and be a successful advocate for thiamine fortification of bakers flour to prevent Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, previously a major cause of morbidity and mortality among chronically alcohol dependent people [<span>3</span>]. Jim had an impact on many who subsequently went on to complete research and further qualifications related to prevention and treatment of alcohol-related harm.</p><p>Jim introduced alcohol content into undergraduate teaching for all students of the Melbourne medical school, as well as undertaking supervision of senior medical officers who rotated through the clinic. This was a forerunner to the later federal government-funded positions for every medical school in Australia, the Coordination of Alcohol and Drug Education in Medical Schools [<span>6, 7</span>].</p><p>An inquiry that was to become the Phillips Royal Commission [<span>8</span>] had started in Victoria prior to Jim's arrival, in response to growing community concern about the social impacts of alcohol and increasing recognition of the contribution of alcohol to illness, and severe injuries and deaths being reported by the police surgeon. There was a demand to deal with the ‘six o'clock swill’—the rapid drinking of alcohol (nearly always beer) between leaving work and the compulsory closure of hotel bars at 6 pm. Jim Rankin became an advisor and this began what was to become Jim's commitment to alcohol-related policy advice to governments.</p><p>Jim and colleagues started to describe the clinical profile of the Alcoholism Clinic's patient data and several publications resulted, especially identifying morbidity and the social profile of patients presenting to the Alcoholism Clinic [<span>9</span>].</p><p>Breen [<span>3</span>] identifies these early publications ‘documenting, in Australia for the first time in a large consecutive series of patients, the extent of physical injuries linked to alcohol misuse and identifying evidence of effects of alcohol on driving efficiency and family relationships’. The size of the problem of alcoholism was extensively reported on, as was the related problem of alcoholic liver disease. The unit also studied alcoholism in women, reporting on 60 new patients over the first 30 months (out of a total of 416) [<span>10</span>].<sup>8</sup></p><p>Rankin worked beyond his own team to identify and include others who had interest in alcohol-related problems. In 1966,<sup>9</sup> he and de Gruchy initiated an all-day seminar, bringing together people from many other medical, psychiatric and welfare establishments, police, the police surgeon, prison personnel, homelessness services and church groups. From this emerged what became an annual symposium: The St Vincent's Hospital Summer School of Alcohol Studies (later to become Studies on Alcohol and Drugs). Many topics were covered over the following years, including alcohol and road safety and alcohol and the family [<span>11</span>].</p><p>Breen [<span>3</span>] reports that the first 5-day Summer School attracted 270 registrants, including many from interstate. Its broad program gained wide publicity and a resolution passed by attendees at the end of the conference declared that ‘alcoholism was a “medical disability”, thereby confirming the medicalisation of the problem; a great help in overcoming stigma at that time’.<sup>10</sup></p><p>Terminology has been ever-changing in this field, and with the emergence more recently in Australia of ‘addiction medicine’, the ever-thoughtful Jim Rankin commented to Breen in 2017 that he was ‘uncomfortable with [this term], believing that, while undoubtedly some of the problems caused by alcohol are indeed a reflection of its addictive properties, focusing narrowly on addiction is unlikely to help a community to solve the wider problem. In addition, the term may suggest that addiction medicine specialists have a “magic bullet” for alcohol misuse, leading to failure to look at the whole person who is in trouble and seeking help, and failure to look at the problems from a whole-of-society viewpoint’ [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Jim's early career involvement with clinical treatment of individuals, his interest in research and evidence and his parallel advisory role in the Victorian review of Liquor Licensing had contributed to his understanding of the relationships between individuals presenting to hospitals and the patterns of alcohol use of the whole community. Thereafter he pursued links between treatment, amelioration and prevention of alcohol and drug harms and progressive approaches to all arms of the response to these problems. Only a month prior to his death he was still working on trying to develop grand theories and overarching conceptual schema to make better use of these links in the interests of prevention.</p><p>What emerges as we trace Jim Rankin's career is his forever pushing forward, reflected both in his work focus and in pursuit of new roles. Once satisfied that he had achieved a goal, he felt impelled to move to new challenges. This underscores his commitment to many new initiatives, especially as he pursued his overarching intent to reduce alcohol and other drug related harm. This was reflected in his movements between Australia and Canada over four decades.</p><p>Jim Rankin returned to Canada in 1982, in part due to the funding changes by government in NSW constricting opportunities, and with consideration of his children's educational opportunities and interests. He became the Director of the Canadian Liver Foundation's Epidemiology Unit and a Professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the University of Toronto, working closely with his former colleague at the Foundation, Dr Mary-Jane Ashley, who was now the Head of that Department. From 1985 to 1993, he served again as Head of Medicine and Physician-in-Chief at the Clinical Institute.</p><p>In a further move, Rankin returned to Australia in 1994 as Clinical Professor at the University of Sydney and Chair of the Central Sydney Area Drug and Alcohol Services. His review of these services led to a major restructure involving the closure of long-term inpatient programs and expansion of ambulatory care.</p><p>Jim Rankin was as much a knowing social and political analyst as a medical practitioner and clinical leader. He noted over years the societal attitudes and practices regarding alcohol and other drugs, the complexity of vested interests in the field, and the enormous effort required to have evidence surface and be used as the key driver of planning and service development. Among other topics, he quietly pronounced on the often-knee-jerk responses to drug-linked crises, and the loss of content knowledge in the public service as it moved toward generic managerialism; he was cynical about politicians' inevitable involvement in drug policy, noting that ‘governments largely see committees of inquiry as a means of defusing a difficult situation, without necessarily needing to respond to eventual reports and recommendations’. [<span>12</span>].</p><p>After his official retirement in 2000, he continued pursuing his interests in the alcohol and other drug field. Honours awarded him include Honorary Fellow in the Australasian Chapter of Addiction Medicine, The Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Honorary Life Memberships of the Canadian Society of Addiction Medicine and Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs. The James Rankin Oration at the annual conference of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs and Rankin Court within the Drug and Alcohol Services at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney have both been named in his honour. In 2017, the University of Sydney awarded Dr Rankin a Doctor of Medical Science (honoris causa).</p><p>His family noted, in announcing Jim's death: ‘Despite a busy family life and career, Jim had a multitude of interests that gave him so much pleasure – politics, photography, cooking, travel, model boat building, beach walking, and sailing. His family will fondly remember him as an incurable tinkerer. His steadfast commitment to family, friends and colleagues, and his strong values, curiosity and intellect will continue to guide us all’.<sup>13</sup></p><p>His professional colleagues will remember him similarly. Jim said of our field: ‘The drug and alcohol field does not fit into any single professional area: it is truly interdisciplinary, and therein lies both its professional strength and its political weakness’ [<span>12</span>].</p><p>We thank Jim Rankin—for his breadth and over 60 years of commitment to reducing harm and supporting others. We have been fortunate to have known Jim in his early career and to have remained connected since.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 1","pages":"6-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.13966","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.13966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photo from https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin: Drs Jim Rankin (left) and Barry Firkin in the early 1960s. (https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin).

James Gerald D'Arcy Rankin, MBBS DMedSci (Hon)/Doctor of Medical Science, (honoris causa), University of Sydney Emeritus Professor of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto.

Dr James (Jim) Rankin, a major leader in developing more effective prevention and treatment services for people with alcohol and other drug problems, died late in 2023 after a long and extraordinarily influential career.

Jim grew up in Sydney, graduating from medicine at The University of Sydney in 1954, and after training at St Vincent's and The Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals he worked as a physician at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney. Here he met Pat, then training to be a nurse and they married in 1957, beginning a 66-year partnership that included creating a family of 6 children, 15 grandchildren and 2 great granddaughters. Jim died only a few months after his wife Pat's death. This family aspect of Jim's life was as vital to him as his professional career.

In 1961, Jim took up a fellowship at Columbia University in New York for 2 years, pursuing research and clinical work on hepatic physiology and disease. On his return to Sydney, not finding a suitable clinical academic position for a gastroenterologist, he was encouraged by the Sisters of Charity to go to their sister hospital in Melbourne. There, Professor Carl de Gruchy, as Head of the Department of Medicine of the University of Melbourne at St Vincent's Hospital, was seeking a suitably qualified physician who might join with him to develop a response to alcohol-associated problems.

Jim Rankin had just the right mix of qualities—both professionally and personally—and was appointed as Second Assistant in that Department at St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne in 1964, concurrently becoming Honorary Assistant Physician to Outpatients.

Rankin reflected that the alcohol field was an unpopular area medically and professionally at that time [1]. However, his interest in broad social and political perspectives together with his medical specialist experience and desire to pursue research made him an ideal manager to develop this, the first clinic for people with alcohol related problems within a large, public, general hospital in Australia.1

The Alcoholism Clinic opened at St Vincent's in inner city Fitzroy2 in 1964 [2]. It was a groundbreaking initiative, involving medical and psycho-social assessment and support services with embedded research, and designed to include both outpatient and inpatient (through consultation) services.3

Dr Kerry Breen, one of the first medical registrars who worked with Jim Rankin in the early days of this clinic, devoted a chapter to the evolution of this Alcoholism Clinic's growth in his de Gruchy biography [3], pointing out: ‘This alcohol service had not arisen in a vacuum. Health problems caused by misuse of alcohol had gained some attention in the Australian medical literature in the 1950s. In 1952, Dr Eric Saint and colleagues had published a series of papers entitled “Studies on chronic alcoholism” in The Medical Journal of Australia4’.

Other medical specialists in Melbourne had identified alcohol use in the aetiology of medical problems. Breen notes ‘Dr John Cade (Snr.), psychiatrist superintendent at Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital (had noted in [4]) that some 35%–40% of the inpatients at his hospital were there as a consequence of alcohol misuse’. However, as Cade commented, ‘community effort directed to the prevention and treatment of alcoholism [had] been negligible’. In 1959, Dr Ian Mackay, working in the clinical research unit of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, had estimated the prevalence of alcoholism in Australia based on deaths from cirrhosis of the liver [5].

Police and corrections services also identified alcohol as a significant contributor to social disruption and crime. Alcohol-related offences were common among the inmates of Melbourne's Pentridge Prison; some with relatively short sentences under the Vagrancy Act, convicted of the informally titled offences of ‘drunk and disorderly’ and ‘with no lawful means of support’.5

At the time Rankin was developing the Alcoholism Clinic, services for homeless men (later, also women) were evolving including St Vincent de Paul Society's Ozanam House from the 1950s6 and the Salvation Army's Bridge Program, specifically for those needing alcohol-related rehabilitation.7 Similarly, an independent organisation, using experience from the Fitzroy-based Brotherhood of St Lawrence researching and responding to poverty, initiated Hanover Welfare Services (taking the name from the Fitzroy Street where it was first located), in 1964. Parallel to Jim Rankin's commitment to research, they declared: ‘Much exact information is required as a basis for planning further work with the men. The methods of the agency should be regarded as experimental, and results evaluated and reported. Client's case records would be compiled so as to allow elucidation of common patterns, and special study might be made of such subjects as excessive drinking and employment difficulties’.

Recalling the very first clinic at St Vincent's, Rankin, when interviewed by Breen, recalled that the first (and only) patient of the clinic on the first day ‘was “Ray S.”, a homeless man with a long history of alcohol dependence, who was brought to the clinic from Pentridge Prison. Ray had been injured at around the time of his arrest and had been seen in the Casualty Department at St Vincent's, where a resident doctor had given him an appointment to the new clinic. If he had not been in prison, it is highly unlikely that Ray would have kept the appointment. From that first visit, Ray abstained from alcohol, and became a respected member of the community and a strong supporter of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA)’ [3]. AA was to become an intrinsic part of every clinic and was offered (not insisted on) to all patients of the clinic for many years.

As the out-patient clinic grew, it began to hold three clinic sessions each week; two in the evenings, recognising the needs of people who could not get there during the day. Jim set up detailed patient data collection and, subsequently, an internal consultancy service to the rest of the hospital, insisting that all the hospital could and would be supported to consider and, where appropriate, treat or refer patients to the ‘Special Clinic’, the title adopted to avoid stigma.

The specialist focus provided an invaluable base of education for junior medical staff, and Jim's belief in teamwork meant including the social worker and the clinic nurse in all aspects of the Clinic's work, including consultancy and research; it encouraged consideration of broad assessment of the person's situation, beyond their biology and drinking history, and meetings with family members were initiated. Others he involved included the hospital dietician, Bev Wood, who would go on to complete a PhD and be a successful advocate for thiamine fortification of bakers flour to prevent Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome, previously a major cause of morbidity and mortality among chronically alcohol dependent people [3]. Jim had an impact on many who subsequently went on to complete research and further qualifications related to prevention and treatment of alcohol-related harm.

Jim introduced alcohol content into undergraduate teaching for all students of the Melbourne medical school, as well as undertaking supervision of senior medical officers who rotated through the clinic. This was a forerunner to the later federal government-funded positions for every medical school in Australia, the Coordination of Alcohol and Drug Education in Medical Schools [6, 7].

An inquiry that was to become the Phillips Royal Commission [8] had started in Victoria prior to Jim's arrival, in response to growing community concern about the social impacts of alcohol and increasing recognition of the contribution of alcohol to illness, and severe injuries and deaths being reported by the police surgeon. There was a demand to deal with the ‘six o'clock swill’—the rapid drinking of alcohol (nearly always beer) between leaving work and the compulsory closure of hotel bars at 6 pm. Jim Rankin became an advisor and this began what was to become Jim's commitment to alcohol-related policy advice to governments.

Jim and colleagues started to describe the clinical profile of the Alcoholism Clinic's patient data and several publications resulted, especially identifying morbidity and the social profile of patients presenting to the Alcoholism Clinic [9].

Breen [3] identifies these early publications ‘documenting, in Australia for the first time in a large consecutive series of patients, the extent of physical injuries linked to alcohol misuse and identifying evidence of effects of alcohol on driving efficiency and family relationships’. The size of the problem of alcoholism was extensively reported on, as was the related problem of alcoholic liver disease. The unit also studied alcoholism in women, reporting on 60 new patients over the first 30 months (out of a total of 416) [10].8

Rankin worked beyond his own team to identify and include others who had interest in alcohol-related problems. In 1966,9 he and de Gruchy initiated an all-day seminar, bringing together people from many other medical, psychiatric and welfare establishments, police, the police surgeon, prison personnel, homelessness services and church groups. From this emerged what became an annual symposium: The St Vincent's Hospital Summer School of Alcohol Studies (later to become Studies on Alcohol and Drugs). Many topics were covered over the following years, including alcohol and road safety and alcohol and the family [11].

Breen [3] reports that the first 5-day Summer School attracted 270 registrants, including many from interstate. Its broad program gained wide publicity and a resolution passed by attendees at the end of the conference declared that ‘alcoholism was a “medical disability”, thereby confirming the medicalisation of the problem; a great help in overcoming stigma at that time’.10

Terminology has been ever-changing in this field, and with the emergence more recently in Australia of ‘addiction medicine’, the ever-thoughtful Jim Rankin commented to Breen in 2017 that he was ‘uncomfortable with [this term], believing that, while undoubtedly some of the problems caused by alcohol are indeed a reflection of its addictive properties, focusing narrowly on addiction is unlikely to help a community to solve the wider problem. In addition, the term may suggest that addiction medicine specialists have a “magic bullet” for alcohol misuse, leading to failure to look at the whole person who is in trouble and seeking help, and failure to look at the problems from a whole-of-society viewpoint’ [3].

Jim's early career involvement with clinical treatment of individuals, his interest in research and evidence and his parallel advisory role in the Victorian review of Liquor Licensing had contributed to his understanding of the relationships between individuals presenting to hospitals and the patterns of alcohol use of the whole community. Thereafter he pursued links between treatment, amelioration and prevention of alcohol and drug harms and progressive approaches to all arms of the response to these problems. Only a month prior to his death he was still working on trying to develop grand theories and overarching conceptual schema to make better use of these links in the interests of prevention.

What emerges as we trace Jim Rankin's career is his forever pushing forward, reflected both in his work focus and in pursuit of new roles. Once satisfied that he had achieved a goal, he felt impelled to move to new challenges. This underscores his commitment to many new initiatives, especially as he pursued his overarching intent to reduce alcohol and other drug related harm. This was reflected in his movements between Australia and Canada over four decades.

Jim Rankin returned to Canada in 1982, in part due to the funding changes by government in NSW constricting opportunities, and with consideration of his children's educational opportunities and interests. He became the Director of the Canadian Liver Foundation's Epidemiology Unit and a Professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the University of Toronto, working closely with his former colleague at the Foundation, Dr Mary-Jane Ashley, who was now the Head of that Department. From 1985 to 1993, he served again as Head of Medicine and Physician-in-Chief at the Clinical Institute.

In a further move, Rankin returned to Australia in 1994 as Clinical Professor at the University of Sydney and Chair of the Central Sydney Area Drug and Alcohol Services. His review of these services led to a major restructure involving the closure of long-term inpatient programs and expansion of ambulatory care.

Jim Rankin was as much a knowing social and political analyst as a medical practitioner and clinical leader. He noted over years the societal attitudes and practices regarding alcohol and other drugs, the complexity of vested interests in the field, and the enormous effort required to have evidence surface and be used as the key driver of planning and service development. Among other topics, he quietly pronounced on the often-knee-jerk responses to drug-linked crises, and the loss of content knowledge in the public service as it moved toward generic managerialism; he was cynical about politicians' inevitable involvement in drug policy, noting that ‘governments largely see committees of inquiry as a means of defusing a difficult situation, without necessarily needing to respond to eventual reports and recommendations’. [12].

After his official retirement in 2000, he continued pursuing his interests in the alcohol and other drug field. Honours awarded him include Honorary Fellow in the Australasian Chapter of Addiction Medicine, The Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and Honorary Life Memberships of the Canadian Society of Addiction Medicine and Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs. The James Rankin Oration at the annual conference of Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and Other Drugs and Rankin Court within the Drug and Alcohol Services at St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney have both been named in his honour. In 2017, the University of Sydney awarded Dr Rankin a Doctor of Medical Science (honoris causa).

His family noted, in announcing Jim's death: ‘Despite a busy family life and career, Jim had a multitude of interests that gave him so much pleasure – politics, photography, cooking, travel, model boat building, beach walking, and sailing. His family will fondly remember him as an incurable tinkerer. His steadfast commitment to family, friends and colleagues, and his strong values, curiosity and intellect will continue to guide us all’.13

His professional colleagues will remember him similarly. Jim said of our field: ‘The drug and alcohol field does not fit into any single professional area: it is truly interdisciplinary, and therein lies both its professional strength and its political weakness’ [12].

We thank Jim Rankin—for his breadth and over 60 years of commitment to reducing harm and supporting others. We have been fortunate to have known Jim in his early career and to have remained connected since.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
詹姆斯-兰金博士,一个走在时代前列的人。
图片来自https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin: 20世纪60年代初,吉姆·兰金博士(左)和巴里·菲尔金博士。(https://www.svha.org.au/news/latest/a-tribute-to-dr-jim-rankin).James Gerald D'Arcy Rankin,医学学士学位(荣誉)/医学博士,(荣誉),悉尼大学多伦多大学公共卫生科学荣誉教授。詹姆斯(吉姆)兰金博士是为酒精和其他毒品问题患者开发更有效的预防和治疗服务的主要领导者,他在经历了漫长而极具影响力的职业生涯后于2023年底去世。吉姆在悉尼长大,1954年从悉尼大学医学院毕业,在圣文森特医院和皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院接受培训后,他在悉尼圣文森特医院担任医生。在这里,他遇到了帕特,当时正在接受护士培训,他们于1957年结婚,开始了66年的合作关系,包括建立了一个有6个孩子、15个孙子和2个曾孙女的家庭。吉姆在他妻子帕特去世几个月后就去世了。吉姆的家庭生活对他来说和他的职业生涯一样重要。1961年,吉姆在纽约哥伦比亚大学获得了两年的奖学金,从事肝脏生理学和疾病的研究和临床工作。回到悉尼后,他没有找到一个适合胃肠病学家的临床学术职位,慈善姐妹会鼓励他去墨尔本的姐妹医院。在那里,墨尔本大学圣文森特医院医学部主任卡尔·德·格鲁奇(Carl de Gruchy)教授正在寻找一名合格的医生,他可能会与他一起对与酒精有关的问题作出反应。1964年,吉姆·兰金被任命为墨尔本圣文森特医院(St Vincent’s Hospital)门诊部的第二助理,同时成为门诊病人的荣誉助理医师。兰金回忆说,当时酒精领域在医学上和专业上都不受欢迎。然而,他对广泛的社会和政治观点的兴趣,加上他的医学专家经验和追求研究的愿望,使他成为发展这一诊所的理想管理者,这是澳大利亚一家大型公立综合医院中第一家针对酒精相关问题的诊所。酗酒诊所于1964年在菲茨罗伊市中心的圣文森特开设。这是一项开创性的倡议,涉及医疗和心理社会评估和支持服务,并嵌入了研究,旨在包括门诊和住院(通过咨询)服务。克里·布林(Kerry Breen)博士是这家诊所早期与吉姆·兰金(Jim Rankin)一起工作的首批医疗登记员之一,他在《德·格鲁奇传》(de Gruchy)中专门用一章描述了这家酒精中毒诊所的发展历程,指出:“这种酒精服务并不是在真空中出现的。”20世纪50年代,滥用酒精造成的健康问题在澳大利亚医学文献中引起了一些关注。1952年,埃里克·圣博士及其同事在《澳大利亚医学杂志》上发表了一系列题为“慢性酒精中毒研究”的论文。墨尔本的其他医学专家在医学问题的病因学上确定了饮酒。布林注意到“约翰·凯德博士(老),皇家公园精神病医院的精神病学家主管(在b[4]中指出),在他的医院里,大约有35%-40%的住院病人是由于滥用酒精而入院的”。然而,正如凯德所说,“社区在预防和治疗酗酒方面的努力微不足道”。1959年,在沃尔特和伊丽莎·霍尔研究所和皇家墨尔本医院临床研究部门工作的伊恩·麦凯博士,根据肝硬化死亡人数估计了澳大利亚酗酒的流行程度。警察和惩戒机构还认为,酒精是造成社会混乱和犯罪的一个重要因素。在墨尔本彭特里奇监狱(Pentridge Prison)的囚犯中,与酒精有关的犯罪很常见;根据《流浪法》,一些人被判相对较短的刑期,罪名是“醉酒扰乱治安”和“无合法手段支持”。在兰金开办酗酒诊所的时候,为无家可归的男人(后来也包括女人)提供的服务也在不断发展,包括20世纪50年代圣文森特·德·保罗协会的奥扎南之家和救世军的桥梁项目,专门为那些需要与酒精有关的康复的人提供服务同样,1964年,一个独立组织利用总部位于菲茨罗伊的圣劳伦斯兄弟会(Brotherhood of St Lawrence)研究和应对贫困的经验,发起了汉诺威福利服务机构(汉诺威福利服务机构的名字来自该机构最初所在的菲茨罗伊街)。与吉姆·兰金致力于研究的同时,他们宣称:“需要更多准确的信息作为计划与男性进一步合作的基础。” 据Breen[3]报道,第一个为期5天的暑期学校吸引了270名注册者,其中许多人来自州际。其广泛的计划得到了广泛的宣传,与会者在会议结束时通过了一项决议,宣布“酗酒是一种“医学残疾”,从而确认了该问题的医学化;这对克服当时的耻辱有很大的帮助。”这个领域的术语一直在不断变化,随着最近在澳大利亚出现的“成瘾医学”,一向深思熟虑的吉姆·兰金(Jim Rankin)在2017年对布林(Breen)评论说,他“对(这个术语)感到不舒服,他认为,虽然酒精引起的一些问题确实反映了它的成瘾特性,但狭隘地关注成瘾不太可能帮助社区解决更广泛的问题。”此外,这个术语可能表明,成瘾医学专家对酒精滥用有一颗“魔弹”,导致他们无法从整体上看待陷入困境并寻求帮助的人,也无法从整个社会的角度看待问题。吉姆的早期职业生涯涉及个人的临床治疗,他对研究和证据的兴趣,以及他在维多利亚时期酒类许可审查中的平行顾问角色,有助于他理解个人到医院就诊与整个社区酒精使用模式之间的关系。此后,他致力于酒精和毒品危害的治疗、改善和预防之间的联系,以及针对这些问题的所有方面采取的渐进办法。就在他去世前一个月,他还在努力发展宏大的理论和总体概念图式,以便更好地利用这些联系来预防疾病。当我们追溯吉姆·兰金的职业生涯时,我们看到的是他永远在前进,这反映在他对工作的专注和对新角色的追求上。一旦达到了一个目标,他就会感到有动力去迎接新的挑战。这强调了他对许多新举措的承诺,特别是在他追求减少酒精和其他与毒品有关的危害的总体意图时。这反映在他40多年来在澳大利亚和加拿大之间的往来中。1982年,吉姆·兰金回到加拿大,部分原因是由于新南威尔士州政府的资金变化限制了机会,同时考虑到他孩子的教育机会和兴趣。他成为加拿大肝脏基金会流行病学部门的主任和多伦多大学预防医学和生物统计学部门的教授,与他在基金会的前同事、现任该部门主任的Mary-Jane Ashley博士密切合作。从1985年到1993年,他再次担任临床研究所的医学主管和首席医师。在进一步的行动中,Rankin于1994年回到澳大利亚,担任悉尼大学临床教授和悉尼中部地区毒品和酒精服务主席。他对这些服务的审查导致了涉及关闭长期住院项目和扩大门诊护理的重大重组。吉姆·兰金是一位见多识广的社会和政治分析家,也是一位医学从业者和临床领导者。他指出,多年来,社会对酒精和其他毒品的态度和做法、该领域既得利益集团的复杂性,以及为使证据浮出水面并将其作为规划和服务发展的关键驱动力所需要的巨大努力。在其他话题中,他低调地谈到了对与毒品有关的危机的下意识反应,以及随着公共服务走向通用管理主义,内容知识的丧失;他对政客们不可避免地卷入毒品政策持怀疑态度,他指出,“政府在很大程度上把调查委员会看作是化解困境的一种手段,而不一定需要对最终的报告和建议做出回应。”[12]。2000年正式退休后,他继续在酒精和其他毒品领域追求自己的兴趣。他获得的荣誉包括澳大利亚成瘾医学分会、澳大利亚皇家医师学院的荣誉会员,以及加拿大成瘾医学学会和澳大利亚酒精和其他药物专业学会的终身荣誉会员。澳大利亚酒精和其他药物专业协会年会上的詹姆斯·兰金致辞以及悉尼圣文森特医院毒品和酒精服务部门的兰金法庭都以他的名字命名。2017年,悉尼大学授予Rankin博士荣誉医学博士学位。他的家人在宣布他去世的消息时说:“尽管吉姆的家庭生活和事业都很繁忙,但他有很多爱好,这些爱好给他带来了很多乐趣——政治、摄影、烹饪、旅行、模型船制作、海滩散步和航海。” 他的家人会深情地记得他是个无可救药的修补匠。他对家庭、朋友和同事的坚定承诺,以及他强烈的价值观、好奇心和智慧将继续指导我们所有人。”他的同行也会同样记住他。吉姆在谈到我们的领域时说:“毒品和酒精领域不适合任何一个单一的专业领域:它是真正的跨学科,这既是它的专业优势,也是它的政治弱点。”我们感谢吉姆·兰金——他的广博和60多年来对减少伤害和支持他人的承诺。我们很幸运能在吉姆早期的职业生涯中就认识他,并一直保持联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
期刊最新文献
Factors Associated With Adult Incarceration Among People With Opioid Use Disorder in New South Wales, Australia. Risky Drinking in Midlife Men: Insights From Australia's National Drug Strategy Household Survey Exploring Age and Sex Differences in the Use of Cannabis Vaping Products: Results From the Canadian Cannabis Survey 2020–2023 Brand Sharing and New Drinking Occasions: A Content Analysis of How Alcohol Brands in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand Promote Zero Alcohol Products Executive Functions in Alcohol Use Disorder: The Positive Role of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation—Prospective Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1