Comprehensive audit of gastrointestinal endoscopy adverse events: Emphasizing quality indicators and economic impact with the AIG-AGREE modification.

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2435-5445
Anudeep Katrevula, Neeraj Singla, Hardik Rughwani, Nitin Jagtap, Goutham Reddy Katukuri, Shubhankar Godbole, Sara Teles de Campos, Sana Fathima Memon, Pradev Inavolu, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Sonam Siddhant Mathur, Aadil Ashraf, Rajendra Patel, Azimudin Haja, Shujaath Asif, Thejesh Katamareddy, Rakesh Kalapala, Mohan Ramchandani, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Darisetty Santosh, Nageshwar Reddy
{"title":"Comprehensive audit of gastrointestinal endoscopy adverse events: Emphasizing quality indicators and economic impact with the AIG-AGREE modification.","authors":"Anudeep Katrevula, Neeraj Singla, Hardik Rughwani, Nitin Jagtap, Goutham Reddy Katukuri, Shubhankar Godbole, Sara Teles de Campos, Sana Fathima Memon, Pradev Inavolu, Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Sonam Siddhant Mathur, Aadil Ashraf, Rajendra Patel, Azimudin Haja, Shujaath Asif, Thejesh Katamareddy, Rakesh Kalapala, Mohan Ramchandani, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Darisetty Santosh, Nageshwar Reddy","doi":"10.1055/a-2435-5445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and study aims:</b> This study aimed to conduct a clinical audit of adverse events (AEs) arising from gastrointestinal endoscopy, utilizing the AGREE classification for AEs and establishing its correlation with the ASGE classification. This study further integrated the economic repercussions of AEs into the AGREE classification through the AIG-AGREE modification. <b>Patients and methods:</b> A prospective observational study was conducted at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India, from July 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The study included all patients who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic procedures. AEs were categorized using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and AGREE classifications. A quality indicator questionnaire containing 15 questions was graded based on the latest ASGE and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. The grading scale ranged from 1 to 3 (poor), 4 to 6 (average), 7 to 9 (excellent), to 10 (outstanding). In addition, the AIG-AGREE modification divided the economic impact into five scales (α, β, γ, δ, and ε) based on multiples of the baseline amount. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05228353) <b>Results:</b> Over the 6-month study period, a total of 42,471 endoscopic procedures were performed, identifying 220 AEs. Analysis revealed a significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.79; <i>P</i> < 0.001) between the grades of AEs in the AGREE and ASGE classifications. The median score for all quality indicators was 8, indicating excellent services based on feedback from 13,042 surveyed patients. Notably, patients with more severe AEs (AGREE III-V) exhibited higher economic impact categories (β, γ, δ, ε) compared with those with less severe AEs (AGREE I-II). <b>Conclusions:</b> The AIG-AGREE modification stands as a pioneering effort that highlights the importance of considering economic factors in the evaluation of AEs in gastrointestinal endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"E1242-E1250"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-5445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: This study aimed to conduct a clinical audit of adverse events (AEs) arising from gastrointestinal endoscopy, utilizing the AGREE classification for AEs and establishing its correlation with the ASGE classification. This study further integrated the economic repercussions of AEs into the AGREE classification through the AIG-AGREE modification. Patients and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India, from July 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The study included all patients who underwent diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic procedures. AEs were categorized using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and AGREE classifications. A quality indicator questionnaire containing 15 questions was graded based on the latest ASGE and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. The grading scale ranged from 1 to 3 (poor), 4 to 6 (average), 7 to 9 (excellent), to 10 (outstanding). In addition, the AIG-AGREE modification divided the economic impact into five scales (α, β, γ, δ, and ε) based on multiples of the baseline amount. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05228353) Results: Over the 6-month study period, a total of 42,471 endoscopic procedures were performed, identifying 220 AEs. Analysis revealed a significant positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.79; P < 0.001) between the grades of AEs in the AGREE and ASGE classifications. The median score for all quality indicators was 8, indicating excellent services based on feedback from 13,042 surveyed patients. Notably, patients with more severe AEs (AGREE III-V) exhibited higher economic impact categories (β, γ, δ, ε) compared with those with less severe AEs (AGREE I-II). Conclusions: The AIG-AGREE modification stands as a pioneering effort that highlights the importance of considering economic factors in the evaluation of AEs in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消化道内窥镜不良事件的全面审计:使用 AIG-AGREE 修正版强调质量指标和经济影响。
背景和研究目的:本研究旨在对胃肠道内窥镜检查引起的不良事件(AEs)进行临床审核,采用 AGREE AEs 分类法,并建立其与 ASGE 分类法的相关性。本研究通过对 AIG-AGREE 进行修改,进一步将 AEs 的经济影响纳入 AGREE 分类。患者和方法:一项前瞻性观察研究于 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日在印度海得拉巴的亚洲肠胃病研究所进行。研究对象包括所有接受内窥镜诊断或治疗手术的患者。AEs采用美国消化内镜学会(ASGE)和AGREE分类法进行分类。根据美国消化内镜学会和欧洲消化内镜学会的最新指南,对包含 15 个问题的质量指标问卷进行了评分。评分标准从 1 到 3(差)、4 到 6(一般)、7 到 9(优秀)到 10(杰出)不等。此外,AIG-AGREE 修改版根据基线金额的倍数将经济影响分为五个等级(α、β、γ、δ 和 ε)。(ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05228353)结果:在为期 6 个月的研究期间,共进行了 42,471 例内窥镜手术,发现 220 例 AE。分析表明,AGREE 和 ASGE 分级中的 AEs 等级之间存在明显的正相关性(皮尔逊相关系数 = 0.79;P < 0.001)。根据 13,042 名受访患者的反馈,所有质量指标的中位数均为 8 分,表明服务非常出色。值得注意的是,与AEs较轻的患者(AGREE I-II)相比,AEs较重的患者(AGREE III-V)表现出更高的经济影响类别(β、γ、δ、ε)。结论AIG-AGREE修改是一项开创性的工作,它强调了在评估消化内镜检查中的AEs时考虑经济因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
期刊最新文献
New cholangiopancreatoscopy-assisted diagnosis of disconnected pancreatic cuct syndrome and bridging disconnected pancreatic duct. Colonoscopy is not mammography: Challenges of applying the Duty of Candor. Complete extraction of main pancreatic duct residual and microstones using an 8-wire basket catheter. Costs and benefits of a formal quality framework for colonoscopy: Economic evaluation. Defining standards for fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy using Delphi methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1