Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Amber van Broekhoven, Willem A Bax, John W Eikelboom, Arend Mosterd, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Jan G P Tijssen, Peter L Thompson, Dominique P V de Kleijn, Sotirios Tsimikas, Jan H Cornel, Calvin Yeang, Saloua El Messaoudi
{"title":"The effects of colchicine on lipoprotein(a)- and oxidized phospholipid-associated cardiovascular disease risk.","authors":"Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Amber van Broekhoven, Willem A Bax, John W Eikelboom, Arend Mosterd, Aernoud T L Fiolet, Jan G P Tijssen, Peter L Thompson, Dominique P V de Kleijn, Sotirios Tsimikas, Jan H Cornel, Calvin Yeang, Saloua El Messaoudi","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Inflammatory lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) on lipoproteins convey residual cardiovascular disease risk. The low-dose colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk of cardiovascular events occurring on standard therapies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We explored the effects of colchicine on Lp(a)- and oxidized lipoprotein-associated risk in a LoDoCo2 biomarker subpopulation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) and OxPLs on apolipoprotein(a) [OxPL-apo(a)] and apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) levels were determined in the biomarker population of the LoDoCo2 trial (n = 1777). The Cox regression analysis was used to compare the risk of the primary endpoint, consisting of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or ischaemia-driven revascularization by biomarker levels. Interactions between treatment, Lp(a), and OxPL levels were evaluated. Lipoprotein(a), OxPL-apo(a), and OxPL-apoB levels were similar between the colchicine and placebo groups. Consistent risk reduction by colchicine was observed in those with Lp(a) < 125 nmol/L and ≥125 nmol/L and the highest OxPL-apo(a) tertile compared with the lowest (Pinteraction = 0.92 and 0.66). The absolute risk reduction for those with Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L appeared higher compared with those with Lp(a) < 125 nmol/L (4.4% vs. 2.4%). A treatment interaction for colchicine was found in those with the highest OxPL-apoB tertile vs. the lowest (Pinteraction = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with CCS, colchicine reduces cardiovascular disease risk in those with and without elevated Lp(a) but absolute benefits appeared higher in those with Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L. Patients with higher levels of OxPL-apoB experienced greater benefit of colchicine, suggesting that colchicine may be more effective in subjects with heightened oxidation-driven inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"758-765"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12257107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Inflammatory lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) on lipoproteins convey residual cardiovascular disease risk. The low-dose colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial showed that colchicine reduced the risk of cardiovascular events occurring on standard therapies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). We explored the effects of colchicine on Lp(a)- and oxidized lipoprotein-associated risk in a LoDoCo2 biomarker subpopulation.
Methods and results: Lipoprotein(a) and OxPLs on apolipoprotein(a) [OxPL-apo(a)] and apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) levels were determined in the biomarker population of the LoDoCo2 trial (n = 1777). The Cox regression analysis was used to compare the risk of the primary endpoint, consisting of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or ischaemia-driven revascularization by biomarker levels. Interactions between treatment, Lp(a), and OxPL levels were evaluated. Lipoprotein(a), OxPL-apo(a), and OxPL-apoB levels were similar between the colchicine and placebo groups. Consistent risk reduction by colchicine was observed in those with Lp(a) < 125 nmol/L and ≥125 nmol/L and the highest OxPL-apo(a) tertile compared with the lowest (Pinteraction = 0.92 and 0.66). The absolute risk reduction for those with Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L appeared higher compared with those with Lp(a) < 125 nmol/L (4.4% vs. 2.4%). A treatment interaction for colchicine was found in those with the highest OxPL-apoB tertile vs. the lowest (Pinteraction = 0.04).
Conclusion: In patients with CCS, colchicine reduces cardiovascular disease risk in those with and without elevated Lp(a) but absolute benefits appeared higher in those with Lp(a) ≥ 125 nmol/L. Patients with higher levels of OxPL-apoB experienced greater benefit of colchicine, suggesting that colchicine may be more effective in subjects with heightened oxidation-driven inflammation.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.