School-based organizational skills training for students in grades 3-5: A cluster randomized trial.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000909
Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, Thomas J Power, Phylicia F Fleming, Katie L Tremont, Bridget Poznanski, Shannon Ryan, Jaclyn Cacia, Theresa Egan, Cristin Montalbano, Alex Holdaway, Ami Patel, Richard Gallagher, Howard Abikoff, A Russell Localio, Jennifer A Mautone
{"title":"School-based organizational skills training for students in grades 3-5: A cluster randomized trial.","authors":"Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, Thomas J Power, Phylicia F Fleming, Katie L Tremont, Bridget Poznanski, Shannon Ryan, Jaclyn Cacia, Theresa Egan, Cristin Montalbano, Alex Holdaway, Ami Patel, Richard Gallagher, Howard Abikoff, A Russell Localio, Jennifer A Mautone","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce organizational skills deficits and homework problems, including the clinic-based Organizational Skills Training (OST-C) program (Abikoff et al., 2013). In this study, OST-C was adapted for schools as a small-group (Tier 2) intervention delivered by school partners (OST-T2).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was conducted in 22 schools serving students from diverse backgrounds. Students (n = 186; 122 male) in Grades 3-5, ages 8-12 (M = 9.7 years; SD = 0.88) with organizational skills deficits referred by teachers were enrolled. Schools were randomly assigned to OST-T2 or treatment as usual with waitlist. OST-T2 consisted of sixteen 35-min child sessions, two caregivers, and two teacher consultations. Outcomes were evaluated with longitudinal mixed effects modeling at posttreatment, 5-month and 12-month follow-up using caregiver and teacher reports of organizational skills, homework, and academic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OST-T2 resulted in reductions in organizational skills deficits on caregiver and teacher report (p < .001) at posttreatment and 5-month follow-up (effect sizes [ES], Cohen's d = 0.96, 1.20). Findings also revealed a reduction in caregiver-reported homework problems at posttreatment and 5-month follow-up (p < .001, ES = 0.60, 0.72), and an improvement in teacher-rated homework at posttreatment (p = .007, ES = 0.64). Effects were attenuated at 12-month follow-up. The effects of OST-T2 on academic measures were not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings provide evidence for the immediate and short-term effectiveness of OST-T2 delivered by school professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"92 10","pages":"674-691"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce organizational skills deficits and homework problems, including the clinic-based Organizational Skills Training (OST-C) program (Abikoff et al., 2013). In this study, OST-C was adapted for schools as a small-group (Tier 2) intervention delivered by school partners (OST-T2).

Method: The study was conducted in 22 schools serving students from diverse backgrounds. Students (n = 186; 122 male) in Grades 3-5, ages 8-12 (M = 9.7 years; SD = 0.88) with organizational skills deficits referred by teachers were enrolled. Schools were randomly assigned to OST-T2 or treatment as usual with waitlist. OST-T2 consisted of sixteen 35-min child sessions, two caregivers, and two teacher consultations. Outcomes were evaluated with longitudinal mixed effects modeling at posttreatment, 5-month and 12-month follow-up using caregiver and teacher reports of organizational skills, homework, and academic performance.

Results: OST-T2 resulted in reductions in organizational skills deficits on caregiver and teacher report (p < .001) at posttreatment and 5-month follow-up (effect sizes [ES], Cohen's d = 0.96, 1.20). Findings also revealed a reduction in caregiver-reported homework problems at posttreatment and 5-month follow-up (p < .001, ES = 0.60, 0.72), and an improvement in teacher-rated homework at posttreatment (p = .007, ES = 0.64). Effects were attenuated at 12-month follow-up. The effects of OST-T2 on academic measures were not significant.

Conclusions: Findings provide evidence for the immediate and short-term effectiveness of OST-T2 delivered by school professionals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对 3-5 年级学生的校本组织能力培训:分组随机试验。
目的:研究表明,减少组织能力缺陷和家庭作业问题的干预措施非常有效,其中包括基于诊所的组织能力训练(OST-C)项目(Abikoff 等人,2013 年)。在本研究中,OST-C 被改编为由学校合作伙伴提供的小组(第二级)干预(OST-T2):研究在 22 所学校进行,这些学校为来自不同背景的学生提供服务。参加研究的学生(n = 186;122 名男生)来自 3-5 年级,年龄在 8-12 岁之间(M = 9.7 岁;SD = 0.88),他们都是由教师推荐的组织能力有缺陷的学生。学校被随机分配到 OST-T2 或照常治疗和候补名单中。OST-T2包括16节35分钟的儿童课程、2名保育员和2名教师咨询。在治疗后、5 个月和 12 个月的随访中,利用照顾者和教师对组织技能、家庭作业和学习成绩的报告,采用纵向混合效应模型对结果进行评估:在治疗后和 5 个月的随访中,OST-T2 导致护理人员和教师报告的组织能力缺陷减少(p < .001)(效应大小 [ES],Cohen's d = 0.96,1.20)。研究结果还显示,在治疗后和 5 个月的随访中,护理人员报告的家庭作业问题有所减少(p < .001, ES = 0.60, 0.72),在治疗后,教师评定的家庭作业有所改善(p = .007, ES = 0.64)。随访 12 个月后,效果有所减弱。OST-T2对学习成绩的影响不显著:研究结果为学校专业人员提供的 OST-T2 的直接和短期有效性提供了证据。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth-delivered depression prevention: Short-term outcomes from a school-based randomized controlled trial. Disruptive child behavior severity and parenting program session attendance: Individual participant data meta-analysis. Change processes associated with functional improvement in a web-based version of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (webSTAIR) for trauma-exposed veterans. Data-informed psychological therapy, measurement-based care, and precision mental health. School-based organizational skills training for students in grades 3-5: A cluster randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1