Matias Dallaserra-Albertini, Juan Pablo Vargas-Buratovic, Andrés Campolo-González, Nicolas Ríos-Espósito, Claudio Nazar-Jara, Salvador Valladares-Pérez, Duniel Ortuño-Borroto
{"title":"Effects of hypotensive anesthesia compared to normotensive anesthesia in orthognathic surgery.","authors":"Matias Dallaserra-Albertini, Juan Pablo Vargas-Buratovic, Andrés Campolo-González, Nicolas Ríos-Espósito, Claudio Nazar-Jara, Salvador Valladares-Pérez, Duniel Ortuño-Borroto","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2024.09.2803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthognathic surgery is widely accepted for correcting dentofacial deformities. Due to the rich blood supply in the head and neck region, considerable bleeding can occur from the incised soft tissues and bone during orthognathic surgery. Hypotensive anesthesia is a method used in surgical practice by which blood pressure is decreased predictably and deliberately to reduce blood loss and improve surgical field. However, there is still uncertainty regarding its effectiveness and safety in orthognathic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis, and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>We identified three systematic reviews, including 11 studies overall, which are randomized trials. We concluded that hypotensive anesthesia may reduce intraoperative blood loss and may improve the quality of surgical field, however, the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as low. On the other hand, orthognathic surgery with HA may make little or no difference in surgical time (low certainty evidence). Finally, no studies were found that reported adverse effects or mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2024.09.2803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Orthognathic surgery is widely accepted for correcting dentofacial deformities. Due to the rich blood supply in the head and neck region, considerable bleeding can occur from the incised soft tissues and bone during orthognathic surgery. Hypotensive anesthesia is a method used in surgical practice by which blood pressure is decreased predictably and deliberately to reduce blood loss and improve surgical field. However, there is still uncertainty regarding its effectiveness and safety in orthognathic surgery.
Methods: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis, and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach.
Results and conclusions: We identified three systematic reviews, including 11 studies overall, which are randomized trials. We concluded that hypotensive anesthesia may reduce intraoperative blood loss and may improve the quality of surgical field, however, the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as low. On the other hand, orthognathic surgery with HA may make little or no difference in surgical time (low certainty evidence). Finally, no studies were found that reported adverse effects or mortality.
期刊介绍:
Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.