Microsurgical Treatment of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Collaborative Investigation From the Multicenter Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003204
Kunal P Raygor, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Daniel A Tonetti, Daniel M S Raper, Ridhima Guniganti, Andrew J Durnford, Enrico Giordan, Waleed Brinjikji, Ching-Jen Chen, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Michael R Levitt, Adam J Polifka, Colin P Derdeyn, Edgar A Samaniego, Amanda Kwasnicki, Ali Alaraj, Adriaan R E Potgieser, Stephanie Chen, Yoshiteru Tada, Akash P Kansagra, Junichiro Satomi, Tiffany Eatz, Eric C Peterson, Robert M Starke, J Marc C van Dijk, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Minako Hayakawa, Bradley A Gross, W Christopher Fox, Louis Kim, Jason Sheehan, Giuseppe Lanzino, Rose Du, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Diederik O Bulters, Gregory J Zipfel, Adib A Abla
{"title":"Microsurgical Treatment of Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Collaborative Investigation From the Multicenter Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research.","authors":"Kunal P Raygor, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Daniel A Tonetti, Daniel M S Raper, Ridhima Guniganti, Andrew J Durnford, Enrico Giordan, Waleed Brinjikji, Ching-Jen Chen, Isaac Josh Abecassis, Michael R Levitt, Adam J Polifka, Colin P Derdeyn, Edgar A Samaniego, Amanda Kwasnicki, Ali Alaraj, Adriaan R E Potgieser, Stephanie Chen, Yoshiteru Tada, Akash P Kansagra, Junichiro Satomi, Tiffany Eatz, Eric C Peterson, Robert M Starke, J Marc C van Dijk, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Minako Hayakawa, Bradley A Gross, W Christopher Fox, Louis Kim, Jason Sheehan, Giuseppe Lanzino, Rose Du, Pui Man Rosalind Lai, Diederik O Bulters, Gregory J Zipfel, Adib A Abla","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>First-line therapy for most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) is endovascular embolization, but some require microsurgical ligation due to limited endovascular accessibility, anticipated lower cure rates, or unacceptable risk profiles. We investigated the most common surgically treated dAVF locations and the approaches and outcomes of each.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent dAVF microsurgical ligation were included. Patient demographics, angiographic information, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were analyzed about used surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed with statistical significance set at a threshold of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 248 patients in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database met inclusion criteria. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were tentorial, anterior cranial fossa (ACF), transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS), convexity/superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and torcular. Most tentorial dAVFs were approached using a suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (39.3%); extended retrosigmoid approach (ERS) (25%); or posterior subtemporal approach (19.6%). All ACF dAVFs used a subfrontal approach; 5.3% also included an anterior interhemispheric approach. Most TSS dAVFs were ligated via ERS (31.3%) or subtemporal (31.3%) approaches. All convexity/SSS dAVFs used an interhemispheric approach. All torcular dAVFs used the suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach, with 10.5% undergoing simultaneous ERS craniotomy. Angiographic occlusion rates after microsurgery were 85.5%, 100%, 75.8%, 79.2%, and 73.7% for tentorial, ACF, TSS, convexity/SSS, and torcular dAVFs, respectively (P = .02); the permanent neurological complication rates were 1.8%, 2.6%, 9.1%, 0%, and 0% (P = .31). There were no statistically significant differences in development of complications (P = .08) or Modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up (P = .11) by fistula location.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although endovascular embolization is the first-line treatment for most intracranial dAVFs, surgical ligation is an important alternative. ACF and tentorial fistulas particularly demonstrate high rates of postoperative obliteration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: First-line therapy for most intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) is endovascular embolization, but some require microsurgical ligation due to limited endovascular accessibility, anticipated lower cure rates, or unacceptable risk profiles. We investigated the most common surgically treated dAVF locations and the approaches and outcomes of each.

Methods: The Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database was retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent dAVF microsurgical ligation were included. Patient demographics, angiographic information, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were analyzed about used surgical approaches and postoperative outcomes. Univariate analyses were performed with statistical significance set at a threshold of P < .05.

Results: In total, 248 patients in the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research database met inclusion criteria. The 5 most common surgically treated dAVF locations were tentorial, anterior cranial fossa (ACF), transverse-sigmoid sinus (TSS), convexity/superior sagittal sinus (SSS), and torcular. Most tentorial dAVFs were approached using a suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach (39.3%); extended retrosigmoid approach (ERS) (25%); or posterior subtemporal approach (19.6%). All ACF dAVFs used a subfrontal approach; 5.3% also included an anterior interhemispheric approach. Most TSS dAVFs were ligated via ERS (31.3%) or subtemporal (31.3%) approaches. All convexity/SSS dAVFs used an interhemispheric approach. All torcular dAVFs used the suboccipital, lateral supracerebellar infratentorial approach, with 10.5% undergoing simultaneous ERS craniotomy. Angiographic occlusion rates after microsurgery were 85.5%, 100%, 75.8%, 79.2%, and 73.7% for tentorial, ACF, TSS, convexity/SSS, and torcular dAVFs, respectively (P = .02); the permanent neurological complication rates were 1.8%, 2.6%, 9.1%, 0%, and 0% (P = .31). There were no statistically significant differences in development of complications (P = .08) or Modified Rankin Scale at the last follow-up (P = .11) by fistula location.

Conclusion: Although endovascular embolization is the first-line treatment for most intracranial dAVFs, surgical ligation is an important alternative. ACF and tentorial fistulas particularly demonstrate high rates of postoperative obliteration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘的显微外科治疗:硬脑膜动静脉瘘疗效研究多中心联盟合作调查》(Multicenter Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research)。
背景和目的:大多数颅内硬脑膜动静脉瘘(dAVFs)的一线治疗方法是血管内栓塞,但有些dAVFs由于血管内可及性有限、预期治愈率较低或不可接受的风险而需要显微外科结扎。我们调查了最常见的手术治疗硬脑膜血管瘤的部位以及每种手术的方法和结果:我们对硬脑膜动静脉瘘结果研究联合会的数据库进行了回顾性研究。纳入了接受硬脑膜动静脉瘘显微手术结扎的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学资料、血管造影信息、手术细节和术后结果。对 5 个最常见的手术治疗 dAVF 位置所使用的手术方法和术后效果进行了分析。进行单变量分析,统计显著性以 P < .05 为临界值:硬脑膜动静脉瘘结果研究联合会数据库中共有 248 名患者符合纳入标准。5个最常见的手术治疗硬脑膜动静脉瘘的位置分别是触角窦、前颅窝(ACF)、横筛窦(TSS)、凸窦/上矢状窦(SSS)和环状窦。大多数触角型 dAVF 采用枕骨下、小脑上外侧幕下入路(39.3%);扩展后蛛网膜入路(ERS)(25%);或后颞下入路(19.6%)。所有ACF dAVF均采用额叶下入路;5.3%还包括大脑半球间前入路。大多数TSS dAVF通过ERS(31.3%)或颞下(31.3%)方法结扎。所有凸面/SSS dAVF均采用半球间入路。所有环形 dAVF 均采用枕骨下、外侧小脑上、脑下入路,其中 10.5% 的患者同时进行了 ERS 开颅手术。显微手术后的血管闭塞率分别为85.5%、100%、75.8%、79.2%和73.7%(P = .02);永久性神经并发症发生率分别为1.8%、2.6%、9.1%、0%和0%(P = .31)。瘘管位置不同,并发症发生率(P = .08)或最后一次随访时的修正Rankin量表(P = .11)差异无统计学意义:结论:虽然血管内栓塞是大多数颅内窦瘘的一线治疗方法,但手术结扎也是一种重要的替代方法。ACF 和触角瘘的术后阻塞率尤其高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of 2 Surgical Techniques-Transposition Versus Interposition Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review of 19 437 Patients. Outcome of Fourth Ventricular Hemorrhage in Ruptured Brain Aneurysms: Impact of Active Blood Clearance and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Prevention. Perioperative Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Use and Rates of Pseudarthrosis After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study. Postoperative Blood Pressure Goals After Craniotomy for Tumor Resection: A National Survey. Prediction of Shunt Malfunction Using Automated Ventricular Volume Analysis and Radiomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1