Niels M R van der Sangen, Jaouad Azzahhafi, Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin, Lucas J G Zaaijer, Wout W A van den Broek, Ronald J Walhout, Melvyn Tjon Joe Gin, Ron Pisters, Deborah M Nicastia, Jorina Langerveld, Georgios J Vlachojannis, Rutger J van Bommel, Yolande Appelman, José P S Henriques, Wouter J Kikkert, Jurriën M Ten Berg
{"title":"Treatment Modifications in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Ticagrelor: Insights from the FORCE-ACS Registry.","authors":"Niels M R van der Sangen, Jaouad Azzahhafi, Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin, Lucas J G Zaaijer, Wout W A van den Broek, Ronald J Walhout, Melvyn Tjon Joe Gin, Ron Pisters, Deborah M Nicastia, Jorina Langerveld, Georgios J Vlachojannis, Rutger J van Bommel, Yolande Appelman, José P S Henriques, Wouter J Kikkert, Jurriën M Ten Berg","doi":"10.1055/a-2421-8866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong> Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are frequently treated with the P2Y<sub>12</sub>-inhibitor ticagrelor. Some patients prematurely discontinue ticagrelor, but the incidence of reasons for and clinical implications of treatment modification are relatively unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong> Data from 4,278 ACS patients (mean age: 63.6 years, 26.1% women) who were discharged on ticagrelor and enrolled in the FORCE-ACS registry between 2015 and 2020 were used. Treatment modifications were categorized as physician-recommended discontinuation, alteration, interruption, or disruption and occurred in 26.7, 20.1, 2.8, and 3.1% of patients within 12 months of follow-up (VISUAL SUMMARY: ). Underlying reasons for treatment modification differed per type of modification. Overall, the rate of ischemic events defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 6.6% at 12 months of follow-up. Cox regression analysis using time-updated modification variables as independent variables showed that treatment interruption (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-5.79, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and disruption (adjusted HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07-5.07, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were associated with an increased risk of ischemic events even after adjustment for relevant confounders. Discontinuation and alteration were not associated with increased ischemic risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> In clinical practice, treatment modifications in ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor are common, although type and reasons for modification are heterogeneous. Treatment interruption and disruption are associated with excess cardiovascular risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23036,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2421-8866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are frequently treated with the P2Y12-inhibitor ticagrelor. Some patients prematurely discontinue ticagrelor, but the incidence of reasons for and clinical implications of treatment modification are relatively unknown.
Methods and results: Data from 4,278 ACS patients (mean age: 63.6 years, 26.1% women) who were discharged on ticagrelor and enrolled in the FORCE-ACS registry between 2015 and 2020 were used. Treatment modifications were categorized as physician-recommended discontinuation, alteration, interruption, or disruption and occurred in 26.7, 20.1, 2.8, and 3.1% of patients within 12 months of follow-up (VISUAL SUMMARY: ). Underlying reasons for treatment modification differed per type of modification. Overall, the rate of ischemic events defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was 6.6% at 12 months of follow-up. Cox regression analysis using time-updated modification variables as independent variables showed that treatment interruption (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.48-5.79, p < 0.01) and disruption (adjusted HR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07-5.07, p = 0.03) were associated with an increased risk of ischemic events even after adjustment for relevant confounders. Discontinuation and alteration were not associated with increased ischemic risk.
Conclusion: In clinical practice, treatment modifications in ACS patients discharged on ticagrelor are common, although type and reasons for modification are heterogeneous. Treatment interruption and disruption are associated with excess cardiovascular risk.
期刊介绍:
Thrombosis and Haemostasis publishes reports on basic, translational and clinical research dedicated to novel results and highest quality in any area of thrombosis and haemostasis, vascular biology and medicine, inflammation and infection, platelet and leukocyte biology, from genetic, molecular & cellular studies, diagnostic, therapeutic & preventative studies to high-level translational and clinical research. The journal provides position and guideline papers, state-of-the-art papers, expert analysis and commentaries, and dedicated theme issues covering recent developments and key topics in the field.