Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review.

IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z
Emma D Whitmyre, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, Roberto López, Debora G Goldberg, Freda Liu, Annamarie B Defayette
{"title":"Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Emma D Whitmyre, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, Roberto López, Debora G Goldberg, Freda Liu, Annamarie B Defayette","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review (N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review (N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年心理健康服务机构中实施基于测量的护理:系统回顾。
基于测量的护理(MBC)是指系统地使用患者报告的数据来为护理决策提供信息并监测治疗进展。事实证明,在成人和青少年的医疗和心理健康治疗环境中,MBC 可以改善患者的治疗效果。虽然许多研究都考察了 MBC 在特定医疗环境中的使用情况,但很少有研究关注 MBC 在青少年群体或不同医疗环境中的实施情况。虽然有综述显示,使用 MBC 对青少年有益,但目前还没有公开发表的综述总结了在青少年服务环境中各项研究的成功策略和实施模式的障碍。为了弥补这些不足,本系统性综述(N = 25 项研究)重点关注了 MBC 在四种青少年服务环境中的实施情况,包括门诊心理健康中心、医疗中心/儿科诊所、学校和临床心理学培训诊所。结果表明,很少有研究采用一致的实施模式或策略来指导工作。此外,在不同的青少年服务环境中,在客户、临床医生和组织层面上,所采用的成功策略以及实施 MBC 的障碍都有很大的重叠。总的来说,作者根据研究结果建议,未来在青少年服务机构中的实施工作应包括:为临床医生提供使用 MBC 的全面培训;将利益相关者的反馈纳入实施过程,以实现初始和持续使用;采用数字测量反馈系统提供 MBC,以实现实时反馈和持续的技术支持;在实施工作中采用健康公平视角,以帮助解决获得和使用 MBC 方面的差异,从而使所有青少年和家庭都能从这一循证实践中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Parental Involvement in Digital Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions for Child Anxiety Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review. Digital Location Tracking of Children and Adolescents: A Theoretical Framework and Review. The Effectiveness of Trauma-Informed Parenting Programs for Traumatized Parents and Their Components: A Meta-Analytic Study. An Interpersonal and Meta-analytic Approach to Parenting Behaviors and Adolescent Sleep.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1