Emma D Whitmyre, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, Roberto López, Debora G Goldberg, Freda Liu, Annamarie B Defayette
{"title":"Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Emma D Whitmyre, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, Roberto López, Debora G Goldberg, Freda Liu, Annamarie B Defayette","doi":"10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review (N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-024-00498-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review (N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.
基于测量的护理(MBC)是指系统地使用患者报告的数据来为护理决策提供信息并监测治疗进展。事实证明,在成人和青少年的医疗和心理健康治疗环境中,MBC 可以改善患者的治疗效果。虽然许多研究都考察了 MBC 在特定医疗环境中的使用情况,但很少有研究关注 MBC 在青少年群体或不同医疗环境中的实施情况。虽然有综述显示,使用 MBC 对青少年有益,但目前还没有公开发表的综述总结了在青少年服务环境中各项研究的成功策略和实施模式的障碍。为了弥补这些不足,本系统性综述(N = 25 项研究)重点关注了 MBC 在四种青少年服务环境中的实施情况,包括门诊心理健康中心、医疗中心/儿科诊所、学校和临床心理学培训诊所。结果表明,很少有研究采用一致的实施模式或策略来指导工作。此外,在不同的青少年服务环境中,在客户、临床医生和组织层面上,所采用的成功策略以及实施 MBC 的障碍都有很大的重叠。总的来说,作者根据研究结果建议,未来在青少年服务机构中的实施工作应包括:为临床医生提供使用 MBC 的全面培训;将利益相关者的反馈纳入实施过程,以实现初始和持续使用;采用数字测量反馈系统提供 MBC,以实现实时反馈和持续的技术支持;在实施工作中采用健康公平视角,以帮助解决获得和使用 MBC 方面的差异,从而使所有青少年和家庭都能从这一循证实践中受益。
期刊介绍:
Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.