Roslyn N. Boyd MSc PT, PhD , Susan Greaves BSc OT, PhD , Jenny Ziviani BSc OT, PhD , Iona Novak BSc OT, PhD , Nadia Badawi MD, PhD , Kerstin Pannek PhD , Catherine Elliott BSc OT, PhD , Margaret Wallen BSc OT, PhD , Catherine Morgan BSc PT, PhD , Jane Valentine MD, PhD , Lisa Findlay BSc OT , Andrea Guzzetta MD, PhD , Koa Whittingham PhD , Robert S. Ware PhD , Simona Fiori MD, PhD , Nathalie L. Maitre MD, PhD , Jill Heathcock PhD PT , Kimberley Scott PhD PT , Ann-Christin Eliasson BSc OT, PhD , Leanne Sakzewski BSc OT, PhD
{"title":"Randomized Comparison Trial of Rehabilitation Very Early for Infants with Congenital Hemiplegia","authors":"Roslyn N. Boyd MSc PT, PhD , Susan Greaves BSc OT, PhD , Jenny Ziviani BSc OT, PhD , Iona Novak BSc OT, PhD , Nadia Badawi MD, PhD , Kerstin Pannek PhD , Catherine Elliott BSc OT, PhD , Margaret Wallen BSc OT, PhD , Catherine Morgan BSc PT, PhD , Jane Valentine MD, PhD , Lisa Findlay BSc OT , Andrea Guzzetta MD, PhD , Koa Whittingham PhD , Robert S. Ware PhD , Simona Fiori MD, PhD , Nathalie L. Maitre MD, PhD , Jill Heathcock PhD PT , Kimberley Scott PhD PT , Ann-Christin Eliasson BSc OT, PhD , Leanne Sakzewski BSc OT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy (Baby-CIMT) with bimanual therapy (Baby-BIM) in infants at high risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a single-blind, randomized-comparison-trial that had the following inclusion criteria: (1) asymmetric brain lesion (2) absent fidgety General Movements, (3) Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination below cerebral palsy cut-points, (4) entry at 3-9 months of corrected age, and (5) >3-point difference between hands on Hand Assessment Infants (HAI). Infants were randomized to Baby-CIMT or Baby-BIM, which comprised 6-9 months of home-based intervention. Daily dose varied from 20 to 40 minutes according to age (total 70-89.2 hours). Primary outcome measure was the HAI after intervention, with secondary outcomes Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment and Bayley III cognition at 24 months of corrected age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 96 infants (51 male, 52 right hemiplegia) born median at 37-weeks of gestation were randomized to Baby-CIMT (n = 46) or Baby-BIM (n = 50) and commenced intervention at a mean 6.5 (SD 1.6) months corrected age. There were no between group differences immediately after intervention on HAI (mean difference [MD] 0.98 HAI units, 95% CI 0.94-2.91; <em>P</em> = .31). Both groups demonstrated significant clinically important improvements from baseline to after intervention (Baby-BIM MD 3.48, 95% CI 2.09-4.87; Baby-CIMT MD 4.42, 95% CI 3.07-5.77). At 24 months, 64 infants were diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (35 Baby-CIMT, 29 Baby-BIM). Infants who entered the study between 3 and 6 months of corrected age had greater change in HAI Both Hands Sum Score compared with those who entered at ≥6 months of corrected age (MD 7.17, 95% CI 2.93-11.41, <em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Baby-CIMT was not superior to Baby-BIM, and both interventions improved hand development. Infants commencing intervention at <6 months corrected age had greater improvements in hand function.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 114381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347624004840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy (Baby-CIMT) with bimanual therapy (Baby-BIM) in infants at high risk of unilateral cerebral palsy.
Study design
This was a single-blind, randomized-comparison-trial that had the following inclusion criteria: (1) asymmetric brain lesion (2) absent fidgety General Movements, (3) Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination below cerebral palsy cut-points, (4) entry at 3-9 months of corrected age, and (5) >3-point difference between hands on Hand Assessment Infants (HAI). Infants were randomized to Baby-CIMT or Baby-BIM, which comprised 6-9 months of home-based intervention. Daily dose varied from 20 to 40 minutes according to age (total 70-89.2 hours). Primary outcome measure was the HAI after intervention, with secondary outcomes Mini-Assisting Hand Assessment and Bayley III cognition at 24 months of corrected age.
Results
In total, 96 infants (51 male, 52 right hemiplegia) born median at 37-weeks of gestation were randomized to Baby-CIMT (n = 46) or Baby-BIM (n = 50) and commenced intervention at a mean 6.5 (SD 1.6) months corrected age. There were no between group differences immediately after intervention on HAI (mean difference [MD] 0.98 HAI units, 95% CI 0.94-2.91; P = .31). Both groups demonstrated significant clinically important improvements from baseline to after intervention (Baby-BIM MD 3.48, 95% CI 2.09-4.87; Baby-CIMT MD 4.42, 95% CI 3.07-5.77). At 24 months, 64 infants were diagnosed with unilateral cerebral palsy (35 Baby-CIMT, 29 Baby-BIM). Infants who entered the study between 3 and 6 months of corrected age had greater change in HAI Both Hands Sum Score compared with those who entered at ≥6 months of corrected age (MD 7.17, 95% CI 2.93-11.41, P = .001).
Conclusions
Baby-CIMT was not superior to Baby-BIM, and both interventions improved hand development. Infants commencing intervention at <6 months corrected age had greater improvements in hand function.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.