Hearing Screening in Older Adults in Primary Care Clinics: How the Effects of Setting and Provider Encouragement Differ by Patient Sex and Race.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Ear and Hearing Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/AUD.0000000000001604
Jessica S West, Judy R Dubno, Howard W Francis, Sherri L Smith
{"title":"Hearing Screening in Older Adults in Primary Care Clinics: How the Effects of Setting and Provider Encouragement Differ by Patient Sex and Race.","authors":"Jessica S West, Judy R Dubno, Howard W Francis, Sherri L Smith","doi":"10.1097/AUD.0000000000001604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Few studies have examined how patient sex or race influence hearing healthcare, which was our study purpose.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a secondary analysis using data from a pragmatic clinical trial that examined the effect of provider encouragement (yes/no) or setting (at-home/clinic) for older adults to follow through with routine hearing screening in primary care and the hearing healthcare pathway. Three protocols were compared: at-home screening without provider encouragement, at-home screening with provider encouragement, and in-clinic screening with provider encouragement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Poisson regression (n = 627) showed few differences by patient sex but showed that Black patients in the at-home protocols were less likely to schedule or complete a formal diagnostic evaluation after a failed screening compared with Black patients in the clinic setting and White patients in all groups. Black patients, regardless of provider encouragement, were less likely to schedule or complete a diagnostic evaluation compared with White patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that in-clinic screenings may increase the use of hearing healthcare for Black patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55172,"journal":{"name":"Ear and Hearing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001604","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Few studies have examined how patient sex or race influence hearing healthcare, which was our study purpose.

Design: We performed a secondary analysis using data from a pragmatic clinical trial that examined the effect of provider encouragement (yes/no) or setting (at-home/clinic) for older adults to follow through with routine hearing screening in primary care and the hearing healthcare pathway. Three protocols were compared: at-home screening without provider encouragement, at-home screening with provider encouragement, and in-clinic screening with provider encouragement.

Results: Poisson regression (n = 627) showed few differences by patient sex but showed that Black patients in the at-home protocols were less likely to schedule or complete a formal diagnostic evaluation after a failed screening compared with Black patients in the clinic setting and White patients in all groups. Black patients, regardless of provider encouragement, were less likely to schedule or complete a diagnostic evaluation compared with White patients.

Conclusions: Results suggest that in-clinic screenings may increase the use of hearing healthcare for Black patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健诊所中老年人的听力筛查:患者性别和种族对环境和提供者鼓励的影响有何不同?
研究目的:很少有研究探讨患者性别或种族对听力保健的影响:很少有研究探讨患者性别或种族对听力保健的影响,而这正是我们的研究目的:我们利用一项实用临床试验的数据进行了二次分析,该试验研究了提供者鼓励(是/否)或环境(上门/门诊)对老年人在初级保健和听力保健途径中进行常规听力筛查的影响。对三种方案进行了比较:无医疗服务提供者鼓励的居家筛查、有医疗服务提供者鼓励的居家筛查和有医疗服务提供者鼓励的诊所筛查:泊松回归(n = 627)显示,患者性别差异不大,但与诊所环境中的黑人患者和所有组别中的白人患者相比,接受上门筛查方案的黑人患者在筛查失败后安排或完成正式诊断评估的可能性较低。与白人患者相比,黑人患者无论是否得到医疗服务提供者的鼓励,都不太可能安排或完成诊断评估:结果表明,诊所内筛查可能会增加黑人患者对听力保健的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ear and Hearing
Ear and Hearing 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From the basic science of hearing and balance disorders to auditory electrophysiology to amplification and the psychological factors of hearing loss, Ear and Hearing covers all aspects of auditory and vestibular disorders. This multidisciplinary journal consolidates the various factors that contribute to identification, remediation, and audiologic and vestibular rehabilitation. It is the one journal that serves the diverse interest of all members of this professional community -- otologists, audiologists, educators, and to those involved in the design, manufacture, and distribution of amplification systems. The original articles published in the journal focus on assessment, diagnosis, and management of auditory and vestibular disorders.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Vestibular Perception and Cognitive Performance in Healthy Adults. Sounds of Nature and Hearing Loss: A Call to Action. Breathy Vocal Quality, Background Noise, and Hearing Loss: How Do These Adverse Conditions Affect Speech Perception by Older Adults? Effects of Tympanic Membrane Electrodes on Sound Transmission From the Ear Canal to the Middle and Inner Ears. The Optimal Speech-to-Background Ratio for Balancing Speech Recognition With Environmental Sound Recognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1