{"title":"Whole genome data confirm pervasive gene discordance in the evolutionary history of Coenonympha (Nymphalidae) butterflies","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Phylogenetic inference is challenged by genealogical heterogeneity amongst molecular markers. Such discordance is driven predominantly by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and interspecific gene flow, and bears attendant consequences for the accurate resolution of species relationships. Understanding the distribution of gene conflict in organismal genomes is, therefore, a key aspect of phylogenetic analysis. In this study, three large phylogenomic datasets (i.e., whole mitogenomes, conserved nuclear protein-coding loci, and genomic windows) are used to probe the extent to which discordance pervades the unresolved phylogeny of <em>Coenonympha</em> (Nymphalidae) butterflies. Gene tree discordance is found to be elevated at multiple historically recalcitrant phylogenetic positions. In particular, species relationships near the crown of <em>Coenonympha</em> and within a rapidly diversifying subclade (the <em>hero</em> group) remain difficult to resolve, suggesting that ILS and gene flow have obscured the evolution of this genus. These findings have implications for the taxonomy of this butterfly group and the study of its diversification history. In addition, this work lends support to a growing body of evidence that gene conflict driven by biological processes stands to confound phylogeny, even when extensive data are used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56109,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790324002148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phylogenetic inference is challenged by genealogical heterogeneity amongst molecular markers. Such discordance is driven predominantly by incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and interspecific gene flow, and bears attendant consequences for the accurate resolution of species relationships. Understanding the distribution of gene conflict in organismal genomes is, therefore, a key aspect of phylogenetic analysis. In this study, three large phylogenomic datasets (i.e., whole mitogenomes, conserved nuclear protein-coding loci, and genomic windows) are used to probe the extent to which discordance pervades the unresolved phylogeny of Coenonympha (Nymphalidae) butterflies. Gene tree discordance is found to be elevated at multiple historically recalcitrant phylogenetic positions. In particular, species relationships near the crown of Coenonympha and within a rapidly diversifying subclade (the hero group) remain difficult to resolve, suggesting that ILS and gene flow have obscured the evolution of this genus. These findings have implications for the taxonomy of this butterfly group and the study of its diversification history. In addition, this work lends support to a growing body of evidence that gene conflict driven by biological processes stands to confound phylogeny, even when extensive data are used.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution is dedicated to bringing Darwin''s dream within grasp - to "have fairly true genealogical trees of each great kingdom of Nature." The journal provides a forum for molecular studies that advance our understanding of phylogeny and evolution, further the development of phylogenetically more accurate taxonomic classifications, and ultimately bring a unified classification for all the ramifying lines of life. Phylogeographic studies will be considered for publication if they offer EXCEPTIONAL theoretical or empirical advances.