Demographic Differences in the Radiology Residency Match, 2022 to 2024.

Taha Lodhi, Francis Deng
{"title":"Demographic Differences in the Radiology Residency Match, 2022 to 2024.","authors":"Taha Lodhi, Francis Deng","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ranking preferences by residency programs in the Match could shape the diversity of selective specialties. We investigated demographic characteristics of applicants and matched residents in radiology and other specialties to identify changes in representation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Survey data from the National Resident Matching Program were obtained for applicants to radiology (diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and combined diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine) and nonradiology programs in the 2022 to 2024 Main Residency Matches. Demographics among applicants preferring a specialty and matched residents were compared using χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiology had a 73.9% match rate (3,486 of 4,718 applicants). Women represented 29.0% of radiology applicants compared with 52.0% in other specialties. In radiology, only US citizenship had higher representation among matched residents compared with applicants (+4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-5.3%) (P = .001). Other demographics were not significantly different between applicants and matched residents in radiology overall. A higher representation of women was observed in matched residents compared with applicants in diagnostic radiology (+2.4%, 95% CI, 0.2%-4.6%) (P = .031) but not interventional radiology (+0.2%, 95% CI, -5.1% to 5.5%) (P = .944). In nonradiology specialties, female sex, nonheterosexual orientation, White race, US citizenship, first-generation medical graduate, and nonurban childhood were associated with higher match rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US citizenship but not other demographic variables was associated with higher rates of matching into radiology. Women are underrepresented among radiology applicants and have slightly higher match rates in diagnostic radiology but not interventional radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":"25-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ranking preferences by residency programs in the Match could shape the diversity of selective specialties. We investigated demographic characteristics of applicants and matched residents in radiology and other specialties to identify changes in representation.

Methods: Survey data from the National Resident Matching Program were obtained for applicants to radiology (diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and combined diagnostic radiology and nuclear medicine) and nonradiology programs in the 2022 to 2024 Main Residency Matches. Demographics among applicants preferring a specialty and matched residents were compared using χ2 tests.

Results: Radiology had a 73.9% match rate (3,486 of 4,718 applicants). Women represented 29.0% of radiology applicants compared with 52.0% in other specialties. In radiology, only US citizenship had higher representation among matched residents compared with applicants (+4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%-5.3%) (P = .001). Other demographics were not significantly different between applicants and matched residents in radiology overall. A higher representation of women was observed in matched residents compared with applicants in diagnostic radiology (+2.4%, 95% CI, 0.2%-4.6%) (P = .031) but not interventional radiology (+0.2%, 95% CI, -5.1% to 5.5%) (P = .944). In nonradiology specialties, female sex, nonheterosexual orientation, White race, US citizenship, first-generation medical graduate, and nonurban childhood were associated with higher match rates.

Conclusion: US citizenship but not other demographic variables was associated with higher rates of matching into radiology. Women are underrepresented among radiology applicants and have slightly higher match rates in diagnostic radiology but not interventional radiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022-2024 年放射科住院医师配对中的人口统计学差异。
目的:住院医师项目在 Match 中的排名偏好可能会影响选择性专科的多样性。我们调查了放射学和其他专业的申请人和匹配住院医师的人口统计学特征,以确定代表性的变化:我们从国家住院医师匹配计划中获得了 2022-2024 年主要住院医师匹配中放射学(诊断放射学、介入放射学和诊断放射学/核医学联合)和非放射学项目申请人的调查数据。通过卡方检验比较了选择专业的申请人和匹配住院医师的人口统计学特征:放射学的匹配率为 73.9%(3486/4718 名申请人)。女性占放射科申请者的 29.0%,而其他专业为 52.0%。在放射科,只有美国公民身份在匹配住院医师中的比例高于申请人(+4.0% [95% CI, 2.8%-5.3%], p=0.001)。在放射学领域,申请人和配对住院医师的其他人口统计学特征没有明显差异。与放射诊断专业的申请者相比,配对住院医师中女性比例较高(+2.4% [95% CI, 0.2-4.6%],p=0.031),但介入放射学专业中女性比例不高(+0.2% [95% CI, -5.1-5.5%],p=0.944)。在非放射学专业中,女性性别、非异性恋性取向、白种人、美国公民身份、第一代医学毕业生和非城市童年与较高的匹配率相关:结论:美国公民身份而非其他人口统计学变量与较高的放射学匹配率有关。女性在放射学申请者中的比例偏低,在诊断放射学中的匹配率略高于介入放射学:在2022-2024年放射学专业住院医师主要匹配周期中,美国公民身份而非其他人口统计学变量与较高的放射学匹配率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization and Targeting of the Main Drivers of Elective Imaging Utilization: A Cross-sectional Study Applying Conjoint Analysis. Patient-Friendly Summary of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density: 2024 Update. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: A Leadership Survey. The End of CMS' Appropriate Use Criteria Program. Preference Signaling in the Radiology Residency Match: National Survey of Applicants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1