Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study.

Francesca De Luca, Annika Suneson, Annika Kits, Emilia Palmér, Stefan Skare, Anna Falk Delgado
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of fast brain MRI compared to routine clinical MRI in patients with glioma grade 3 and 4 -a pilot study.","authors":"Francesca De Luca, Annika Suneson, Annika Kits, Emilia Palmér, Stefan Skare, Anna Falk Delgado","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>EPIMix is a fast brain MRI technique not previously investigated in patients with glioma grades 3 and 4. This pilot study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of EPIMix in the radiological treatment evaluation of adult patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 compared to routine clinical MRI (rcMRI).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 investigated with rcMRI and EPIMix were retrospectively included in the study. Three readers (R1-3) participated in the radiological assessment applying Response Assessment for Neuro-oncology Criteria (RANO 2.0), of which two (R1-2) independently evaluated EPIMix and later rcMRI by measuring contrast-enhancing and non-contrastenhancing tumor regions at each follow-up. For cases with discrepant evaluations, an unblinded side-by-side (EPIMix and rcMRI) reading was performed together with a third reader (R3). Comparisons between methods (EPIMix vs. rcMRI) were performed using Weighted Cohen's kappa. The sensitivity and specificity to detect tumor progression (PD) on a follow-up scan were calculated for EPIMix compared to rcMRI with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 35 patients (mean age 53, 31% females), a total of 93 MRIs encompassing 58 follow-up investigations showed PD at blinded reading in 33% of EPIMix (19/58, R1-2), while in 31% (18/58 exams, R1), and 34% (20/58 exams, R2) of rcMRI. An almost perfect agreement for tumor category assessment was found between EPIMix and rcMRI (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1 ϰ= 0.96; EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2 ϰ= 0.89). The sensitivity for EPIMix to detect PD was 1.00 (0.81-1.00) for R1 and 0.90 (0.68-0.99) for R2, while the specificity was 0.97 (0.86-1.00) for R1-2. The AUC for PD was 0.99 for R1 (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1) and 0.94 for R2 (EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2), DeLong's test AUCR1 vs. AUCR2 p=0.20 (R1-2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, EPIMix was used as a fast MRI alternative for treatment evaluation of patients with glioma grades 3 and 4, with high, but slightly lower diagnostic performance than rcMRI.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CR = complete response; EPIMix = multi-contrast echo-planar imaging-based technique; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; RANO = response assessment in neuro-oncology; R1 = reader 1; R2 = reader 2; R3 = reader 3; rcMRI = routine clinical MRI; SD = stable disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: EPIMix is a fast brain MRI technique not previously investigated in patients with glioma grades 3 and 4. This pilot study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of EPIMix in the radiological treatment evaluation of adult patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 compared to routine clinical MRI (rcMRI).

Materials and methods: Patients with glioma grades 3 and 4 investigated with rcMRI and EPIMix were retrospectively included in the study. Three readers (R1-3) participated in the radiological assessment applying Response Assessment for Neuro-oncology Criteria (RANO 2.0), of which two (R1-2) independently evaluated EPIMix and later rcMRI by measuring contrast-enhancing and non-contrastenhancing tumor regions at each follow-up. For cases with discrepant evaluations, an unblinded side-by-side (EPIMix and rcMRI) reading was performed together with a third reader (R3). Comparisons between methods (EPIMix vs. rcMRI) were performed using Weighted Cohen's kappa. The sensitivity and specificity to detect tumor progression (PD) on a follow-up scan were calculated for EPIMix compared to rcMRI with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: In 35 patients (mean age 53, 31% females), a total of 93 MRIs encompassing 58 follow-up investigations showed PD at blinded reading in 33% of EPIMix (19/58, R1-2), while in 31% (18/58 exams, R1), and 34% (20/58 exams, R2) of rcMRI. An almost perfect agreement for tumor category assessment was found between EPIMix and rcMRI (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1 ϰ= 0.96; EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2 ϰ= 0.89). The sensitivity for EPIMix to detect PD was 1.00 (0.81-1.00) for R1 and 0.90 (0.68-0.99) for R2, while the specificity was 0.97 (0.86-1.00) for R1-2. The AUC for PD was 0.99 for R1 (EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1) and 0.94 for R2 (EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2), DeLong's test AUCR1 vs. AUCR2 p=0.20 (R1-2).

Conclusions: In this pilot study, EPIMix was used as a fast MRI alternative for treatment evaluation of patients with glioma grades 3 and 4, with high, but slightly lower diagnostic performance than rcMRI.

Abbreviations: CR = complete response; EPIMix = multi-contrast echo-planar imaging-based technique; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; RANO = response assessment in neuro-oncology; R1 = reader 1; R2 = reader 2; R3 = reader 3; rcMRI = routine clinical MRI; SD = stable disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速脑磁共振成像与常规临床磁共振成像在胶质瘤 3 级和 4 级患者中的诊断性能比较 - 一项试点研究。
背景和目的:EPIMix是一种快速脑部磁共振成像技术,以前从未在3级和4级胶质瘤患者中进行过研究。这项试验性研究旨在调查 EPIMix 与常规临床磁共振成像(rcMRI)相比,在对 3 级和 4 级成年胶质瘤患者进行放射治疗评估时的诊断性能:研究回顾性地纳入了使用rcMRI和EPIMix进行检查的3级和4级胶质瘤患者。三名阅读者(R1-3)参与了采用神经肿瘤学反应评估标准(RANO 2.0)进行的放射学评估,其中两名阅读者(R1-2)在每次随访时通过测量对比增强和非对比增强肿瘤区域,独立评估 EPIMix 和后来的 rcMRI。对于评估结果不一致的病例,由第三位阅读者(R3)进行非盲法并排(EPIMix 和 rcMRI)阅读。不同方法(EPIMix 与 rcMRI)之间的比较采用加权科恩卡帕法进行。通过接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)评估曲线下面积(AUC),计算出 EPIMix 与 rcMRI 相比在后续扫描中检测肿瘤进展(PD)的灵敏度和特异性:在35名患者(平均年龄53岁,31%为女性)的58次随访检查共93次磁共振成像中,33%的EPIMix(19次/58次,R1-2)在盲读时显示出PD,而31%的rcMRI(18次/58次,R1)和34%的rcMRI(20次/58次,R2)在盲读时显示出PD。EPIMix和rcMRI对肿瘤类别的评估几乎完全一致(EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1 ϰ=0.96;EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2 ϰ=0.89)。EPIMix 对 R1 检测 PD 的灵敏度为 1.00(0.81-1.00),对 R2 检测 PD 的灵敏度为 0.90(0.68-0.99),而对 R1-2 检测 PD 的特异性为 0.97(0.86-1.00)。R1(EPIMixR1 vs. rcMRIR1)和R2(EPIMixR2 vs. rcMRIR2)的PD AUC分别为0.99和0.94,DeLong检验AUCR1 vs. AUCR2 p=0.20(R1-2):在这项试验研究中,EPIMix可作为胶质瘤3级和4级患者治疗评估的快速磁共振成像替代方法,其诊断性能较高,但略低于rcMRI:缩写:CR = 完全反应;EPIMix = 基于多对比度回声平面成像技术;PD = 进展性疾病;PR = 部分反应;RANO = 神经肿瘤学反应评估;R1 = 阅读器 1;R2 = 阅读器 2;R3 = 阅读器 3;rcMRI = 常规临床 MRI;SD = 稳定性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Imaging Findings in Giant Cell Arteritis: Don't Turn a Blind Eye to the Obvious! Patient and Provider Characteristics Associated with the Receipt of Image-Guided Interventions for Low Back Pain. Prediction of Difficult Round Window Visibility during Cochlear Implantation via a Reformatted CT Facial Recess View: A Retrospective Study with Surgical Correlation. Multicenter Automated Central Vein Sign Detection Performs as Well as Manual Assessment for the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Performance of Automated Algorithm in Large and Medium Vessel Occlusion Detection: A Real-World Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1