Evaluation of test-negative design estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in the context of multiple, co-circulating, vaccine preventable respiratory viruses

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126493
Aleda M. Leis , Abram Wagner , Brendan Flannery , Jessie R. Chung , Arnold S. Monto , Emily T. Martin
{"title":"Evaluation of test-negative design estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in the context of multiple, co-circulating, vaccine preventable respiratory viruses","authors":"Aleda M. Leis ,&nbsp;Abram Wagner ,&nbsp;Brendan Flannery ,&nbsp;Jessie R. Chung ,&nbsp;Arnold S. Monto ,&nbsp;Emily T. Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Test-negative design (TND) studies are cornerstones of vaccine effectiveness (VE) monitoring for influenza. The introduction of SARS-CoV-2 and RSV vaccines complicate the analysis of this design, with control selection restriction based on other pathogen diagnosis proposed as a solution. We conducted a simulation study and secondary analysis of 2017–18 and 2018–19 TND estimates from a Southeast Michigan ambulatory population to evaluate RSV-status-based control restriction. Simulations suggest that with vaccine-preventable RSV, influenza VE could be moderately biased with RSV prevalence ≥25 % of controls. Real-world analysis showed 151 influenza-negative adults (10.4 %) had RSV detected from the enrollment nasal swab. There were minimal differences in results of adjusted models with or without RSV exclusion from control groups. Findings suggest that inclusion of RSV cases in the control group of TND studies for influenza VE, particularly where RSV is not vaccine preventable, does not currently pose a major concern for bias in VE estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"42 26","pages":"Article 126493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24011757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Test-negative design (TND) studies are cornerstones of vaccine effectiveness (VE) monitoring for influenza. The introduction of SARS-CoV-2 and RSV vaccines complicate the analysis of this design, with control selection restriction based on other pathogen diagnosis proposed as a solution. We conducted a simulation study and secondary analysis of 2017–18 and 2018–19 TND estimates from a Southeast Michigan ambulatory population to evaluate RSV-status-based control restriction. Simulations suggest that with vaccine-preventable RSV, influenza VE could be moderately biased with RSV prevalence ≥25 % of controls. Real-world analysis showed 151 influenza-negative adults (10.4 %) had RSV detected from the enrollment nasal swab. There were minimal differences in results of adjusted models with or without RSV exclusion from control groups. Findings suggest that inclusion of RSV cases in the control group of TND studies for influenza VE, particularly where RSV is not vaccine preventable, does not currently pose a major concern for bias in VE estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多种疫苗可预防的呼吸道病毒共同流行的情况下,评估流感疫苗有效性的试验阴性设计估计值。
阴性试验设计(TND)研究是流感疫苗有效性(VE)监测的基石。SARS-CoV-2 和 RSV 疫苗的引入使该设计的分析变得更加复杂,因此提出了基于其他病原体诊断的对照选择限制作为解决方案。我们开展了一项模拟研究,并对密歇根州东南部流动人口的 2017-18 年和 2018-19 年 TND 估计值进行了二次分析,以评估基于 RSV 状态的控制限制。模拟结果表明,对于可通过疫苗预防的 RSV,当 RSV 在控制人群中的流行率≥25% 时,流感 VE 可能会出现中度偏差。真实世界分析显示,151 名流感阴性成人(10.4%)从入学鼻拭子中检测到了 RSV。在对照组中排除或不排除 RSV 的调整模型结果差异很小。研究结果表明,将 RSV 病例纳入流感 VE TND 研究的对照组,尤其是在 RSV 无法通过疫苗预防的情况下,目前不会对 VE 估计值的偏差造成重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
Re: Using observational data to explore the hypothesis that a single dose of current HPV vaccines can provide durable protection: Reply to the commentary written by Christine Velicer, Alain Luxembourg, Ya-Ting Chen, Melvin Kohn, and Alfred Saah, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA on the IARC-India HPV vaccine study. The stability of PCV2 virus-like particles from mammalian cells and challenges for biotechnological applications Assessing human B cell responses to influenza virus vaccines and adjuvants in a PBMC-derived in vitro culture system The effectiveness of vaccines against COVID-19 in Mexico: A time series approach Exploring Chatbot contributions to enhancing vaccine literacy and uptake: A scoping review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1