J. Marimuthu , K.M.W. Loudon , L.J. Smith , G.E. Gardner
{"title":"Comparison of ultra-wide band microwave system and ultrasound in live cattle to predict beef carcase subcutaneous fatness","authors":"J. Marimuthu , K.M.W. Loudon , L.J. Smith , G.E. Gardner","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ultrasound and ultrawide band microwave system (MiS) were directly compared in their ability to scan live cattle to predict carcase traits. Commercial beef cattle (<em>n</em> = 315) were scanned on farm 0–14 days prior to slaughter. Traits measured were subcutaneous fatness at the P8 site (over the gluteus muscle on the rump, at the intersection of a line through the pin bone parallel to the chine and perpendicular through the 3rd sacral crest) and subcutaneous fatness at the rib fat site (between 12th & 13th rib, ¾ of the length ventrally over the longissimus muscle). The precision of prediction of carcase traits was slightly better using MiS. MiS prediction of P8 fat depth had an average RMSEP of 2.48 mm and R2 of 0.65. The MiS could predict carcase rib fat with an average RMSEP of 2.28 mm and R2 of 0.56. The accuracy of prediction was very similar between the two technologies. When predicting P8, the average bias was smallest using MiS at 0.157 mm, but the average slope was smallest using ultrasound at 0.03 mm. When predicting rib fat, MiS had the smallest average bias at 0.204 mm, and smallest average slope deviation at 0.06 mm. The MiS predicted P8 and rib fat carcase traits with similar precision and accuracy as ultrasound.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 109694"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024002717","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ultrasound and ultrawide band microwave system (MiS) were directly compared in their ability to scan live cattle to predict carcase traits. Commercial beef cattle (n = 315) were scanned on farm 0–14 days prior to slaughter. Traits measured were subcutaneous fatness at the P8 site (over the gluteus muscle on the rump, at the intersection of a line through the pin bone parallel to the chine and perpendicular through the 3rd sacral crest) and subcutaneous fatness at the rib fat site (between 12th & 13th rib, ¾ of the length ventrally over the longissimus muscle). The precision of prediction of carcase traits was slightly better using MiS. MiS prediction of P8 fat depth had an average RMSEP of 2.48 mm and R2 of 0.65. The MiS could predict carcase rib fat with an average RMSEP of 2.28 mm and R2 of 0.56. The accuracy of prediction was very similar between the two technologies. When predicting P8, the average bias was smallest using MiS at 0.157 mm, but the average slope was smallest using ultrasound at 0.03 mm. When predicting rib fat, MiS had the smallest average bias at 0.204 mm, and smallest average slope deviation at 0.06 mm. The MiS predicted P8 and rib fat carcase traits with similar precision and accuracy as ultrasound.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.