Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand

Thanapong Champahom , Dissakoon Chonsalasin , Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao , Chayapol Phupatt , Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand","authors":"Thanapong Champahom ,&nbsp;Dissakoon Chonsalasin ,&nbsp;Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao ,&nbsp;Chayapol Phupatt ,&nbsp;Vatanavongs Ratanavaraha","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) is pivotal for advancing sustainable transportation and reducing environmental impacts. Despite government efforts, BEV adoption in Thailand remains below expected levels. This study identifies and evaluates the barriers to BEV adoption through a comprehensive survey administered to 3,069 respondents across Thailand. Employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the study categorizes and quantifies these barriers, offering insights into the factors that hinder consumer acceptance of BEVs. The results reveal that ’Vehicle attributes’, including concerns about efficiency, range, and reliability, is the most significant barrier for both BEV and ICE users. However, the order and strength of subsequent barriers differ between these groups. For BEV users, ’Public Data’ and ’Lack of Benefits’ follow as major concerns, while ICE users prioritize ’Financial Barriers’ and ’Consumer Concerns’. Notably, BEV users generally perceive these barriers more strongly across all categories. Based on these findings, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations aimed at addressing these barriers for both current and potential BEV users. Enhancing vehicle attributes characteristics, expanding charging infrastructure, implementing educational campaigns, revising fiscal incentives, and rebranding EVs through effective marketing strategies are critical measures suggested. These interventions are designed to align with both BEV and ICE user expectations and catalyze the broader acceptance and adoption of BEVs in Thailand. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on sustainable transportation but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) is pivotal for advancing sustainable transportation and reducing environmental impacts. Despite government efforts, BEV adoption in Thailand remains below expected levels. This study identifies and evaluates the barriers to BEV adoption through a comprehensive survey administered to 3,069 respondents across Thailand. Employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the study categorizes and quantifies these barriers, offering insights into the factors that hinder consumer acceptance of BEVs. The results reveal that ’Vehicle attributes’, including concerns about efficiency, range, and reliability, is the most significant barrier for both BEV and ICE users. However, the order and strength of subsequent barriers differ between these groups. For BEV users, ’Public Data’ and ’Lack of Benefits’ follow as major concerns, while ICE users prioritize ’Financial Barriers’ and ’Consumer Concerns’. Notably, BEV users generally perceive these barriers more strongly across all categories. Based on these findings, this study proposes targeted policy recommendations aimed at addressing these barriers for both current and potential BEV users. Enhancing vehicle attributes characteristics, expanding charging infrastructure, implementing educational campaigns, revising fiscal incentives, and rebranding EVs through effective marketing strategies are critical measures suggested. These interventions are designed to align with both BEV and ICE user expectations and catalyze the broader acceptance and adoption of BEVs in Thailand. This research not only contributes to the academic discourse on sustainable transportation but also provides actionable insights for policymakers and industry stakeholders to accelerate the transition to electric mobility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电池电动汽车和内燃机汽车用户采用电池电动汽车的障碍比较分析:泰国案例研究
采用电池电动汽车(BEV)对于推进可持续交通和减少环境影响至关重要。尽管政府做出了努力,但泰国的 BEV 采用率仍低于预期水平。本研究通过对泰国全国 3069 名受访者进行全面调查,确定并评估了采用 BEV 的障碍。研究采用探索性因素分析法(EFA)和确认性因素分析法(CFA),对这些障碍进行分类和量化,从而深入了解阻碍消费者接受 BEV 的因素。研究结果显示,"车辆属性",包括对效率、续航里程和可靠性的担忧,是 BEV 和内燃机车用户面临的最大障碍。然而,这两类用户在后续障碍的排序和强度上有所不同。对于 BEV 用户来说,"公共数据 "和 "缺乏益处 "是其次的主要问题,而 ICE 用户则优先考虑 "资金障碍 "和 "消费者担忧"。值得注意的是,在所有类别中,BEV 用户对这些障碍的感知普遍更强烈。基于这些发现,本研究提出了有针对性的政策建议,旨在为当前和潜在的 BEV 用户解决这些障碍。建议采取的关键措施包括:增强车辆属性特征、扩大充电基础设施、开展教育活动、修改财政激励措施以及通过有效的营销策略重塑电动汽车的品牌形象。这些干预措施旨在满足 BEV 和内燃机车用户的期望,促进 BEV 在泰国得到更广泛的接受和采用。这项研究不仅为可持续交通的学术讨论做出了贡献,还为政策制定者和行业利益相关者加快向电动交通转型提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Electric mobility investment in the power and transport sector coupling context: Lessons from Argentina, the Philippines, Poland and Romania Comparative Analysis of barriers to Battery electric vehicle adoption between BEV and ICE Users: A case study of Thailand Disparities in ridehailing travel times for accessing non-work destinations Optimal bus reassignment considering in-vehicle overcrowding Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1