Investigation and self-assessment of liver transplantation training physicians at Shanghai Renji Hospital: A preliminary study

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.004
{"title":"Investigation and self-assessment of liver transplantation training physicians at Shanghai Renji Hospital: A preliminary study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Continuing medical education in liver transplantation is pivotal in enhancing the proficiency of liver surgeons. The goal of this study is to obtain information on all aspects of the training, enable us to pinpoint the training's strengths, and address any shortcomings or challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We conducted an online questionnaire survey, which was comprised of 33 questions, offering response options in the form of “yes/no”, single choice, or multiple choice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 59 liver surgeons actively participated in the questionnaire survey. The majority of them exhibited a comprehensive understanding of the liver transplant training program, encompassing its structure, content, and assessment format. It is noteworthy that all respondents expressed keen interest in novel course components such as medical humanities, interpersonal communication, full-process patient management, and scientific research and academic activities. The overall satisfaction with the diverse specialized training courses was notably high. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in self-confidence among participants for performing relevant clinical practices post-training, signifying the effectiveness of the program. Notably, key determinants influencing physicians' confidence levels before and after training included accumulated clinical practice time, basic operation cases, and educational background.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This survey reveals that trainees possess a commendable grasp of the program, maintain a positive outlook, and gain substantial benefits from the training. Importantly, it underscores the need to enhance the pedagogical skills of professional training instructors, continually refine the curriculum, and serve as a foundation for informed decisions in the ongoing training of liver transplant physicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Continuing medical education in liver transplantation is pivotal in enhancing the proficiency of liver surgeons. The goal of this study is to obtain information on all aspects of the training, enable us to pinpoint the training's strengths, and address any shortcomings or challenges.

Method

We conducted an online questionnaire survey, which was comprised of 33 questions, offering response options in the form of “yes/no”, single choice, or multiple choice.

Results

A total of 59 liver surgeons actively participated in the questionnaire survey. The majority of them exhibited a comprehensive understanding of the liver transplant training program, encompassing its structure, content, and assessment format. It is noteworthy that all respondents expressed keen interest in novel course components such as medical humanities, interpersonal communication, full-process patient management, and scientific research and academic activities. The overall satisfaction with the diverse specialized training courses was notably high. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in self-confidence among participants for performing relevant clinical practices post-training, signifying the effectiveness of the program. Notably, key determinants influencing physicians' confidence levels before and after training included accumulated clinical practice time, basic operation cases, and educational background.

Conclusion

This survey reveals that trainees possess a commendable grasp of the program, maintain a positive outlook, and gain substantial benefits from the training. Importantly, it underscores the need to enhance the pedagogical skills of professional training instructors, continually refine the curriculum, and serve as a foundation for informed decisions in the ongoing training of liver transplant physicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上海仁济医院肝移植培训医师的调查与自我评估:初步研究
背景肝移植的继续医学教育对提高肝脏外科医生的水平至关重要。本研究的目的是获取有关培训各个方面的信息,使我们能够明确培训的优势,并解决任何不足或挑战。方法我们进行了在线问卷调查,其中包括 33 个问题,回答方式有 "是/否"、单选或多选。他们中的大多数人都对肝移植培训项目有了全面的了解,包括其结构、内容和评估形式。值得注意的是,所有受访者都对医学人文、人际沟通、全程患者管理、科研和学术活动等新颖的课程内容表现出浓厚的兴趣。对各种专业培训课程的总体满意度明显较高。此外,学员们在培训后开展相关临床实践的自信心也有了显著提高,这表明该项目卓有成效。值得注意的是,影响医生培训前后自信水平的主要决定因素包括累计临床实践时间、基本操作病例和教育背景。重要的是,它强调了提高专业培训导师的教学技能、不断完善课程设置的必要性,并为肝移植医生的持续培训提供了明智决策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Immersive collaborative virtual reality for case-based graduate student teaching in thoracic surgery: A piloting study Rapid liver graft implantation in canine: A preliminary study A nomogram for cancer-specific survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients: A SEER based analysis Investigation and self-assessment of liver transplantation training physicians at Shanghai Renji Hospital: A preliminary study Optimizing the role of scrub nurses during robotic surgery console time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1