Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104169
Jill M.G. Bally , Shelley Spurr , Karen Juckes , Erick McNair , Heather Hodgson-Viden , Prosanta Mondal , Roona Sinha
{"title":"Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration","authors":"Jill M.G. Bally ,&nbsp;Shelley Spurr ,&nbsp;Karen Juckes ,&nbsp;Erick McNair ,&nbsp;Heather Hodgson-Viden ,&nbsp;Prosanta Mondal ,&nbsp;Roona Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about the influence of interprofessional education (IPE) on interprofessional collaboration (IPC), particularly following the COVID 19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine nursing students’ perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities founded on the competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Third year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including: Demographic items, the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment (IPEC) (Version 3). Students completed reflective questions about their IPE experiences. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, confidence intervals, and point estimates were used to measure the differences from pre- to post-participation for all items of the ICCAS and IPEC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants reported improved IPC competence on every item and overall, after the IPE activities. Participants from urban campuses had lower ICCAS scores (PE 0.38, 95 % CI, 0.12–0.65) than those from rural campuses (PE 0.45 95 % CI, 0.18–0.72). Students who identified as men had higher team functioning scores before participating in the IPE activities than women (PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05–0.95). The IPEC Interaction items mean score was 4.03 ±.50 and IPE values items were higher with a mean of 4.62 ± 0.46.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings can guide development and implementation of IPE experiences for nursing and allied healthcare students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the influence of interprofessional education (IPE) on interprofessional collaboration (IPC), particularly following the COVID 19 pandemic.

Aim

To examine nursing students’ perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities founded on the competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.

Design

A cross-sectional design was used.

Methods

Third year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including: Demographic items, the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment (IPEC) (Version 3). Students completed reflective questions about their IPE experiences. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, confidence intervals, and point estimates were used to measure the differences from pre- to post-participation for all items of the ICCAS and IPEC.

Results

Participants reported improved IPC competence on every item and overall, after the IPE activities. Participants from urban campuses had lower ICCAS scores (PE 0.38, 95 % CI, 0.12–0.65) than those from rural campuses (PE 0.45 95 % CI, 0.18–0.72). Students who identified as men had higher team functioning scores before participating in the IPE activities than women (PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05–0.95). The IPEC Interaction items mean score was 4.03 ±.50 and IPE values items were higher with a mean of 4.62 ± 0.46.

Conclusions

The findings can guide development and implementation of IPE experiences for nursing and allied healthcare students.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生在参加虚拟和浸入式跨专业教育活动后对跨专业合作实践能力的感知:定量探索
Aim To examine nursing students' perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities based on competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.DesignA crosssectional design was used.MethodsThird year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including:调查内容包括:人口统计学项目、修订版专业间协作能力达成情况调查(ICCAS)和专业间教育协作能力自我评估(IPEC)(第 3 版)。学生完成了有关其 IPE 经验的反思性问题。使用描述性统计、配对 t 检验、置信区间和点估计来测量 ICCAS 和 IPEC 所有项目从参与前到参与后的差异。来自城市校园的参与者的 ICCAS 分数(PE 0.38,95 % CI,0.12-0.65)低于来自农村校园的参与者(PE 0.45,95 % CI,0.18-0.72)。与女生相比,男生在参加 IPE 活动前的团队功能得分更高(PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05-0.95)。IPEC互动项目平均得分为4.03±.50,IPE价值项目平均得分为4.62±0.46,IPE价值项目平均得分为4.62±0.46。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
‘Listen with an open-heart always’ – A qualitative study exploring transformational learning opportunities for Australian midwifery students participating in a virtual international study experience Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration Nurses' experiences of working with robotic assisted surgery in an Irish healthcare setting: A qualitative descriptive design Graduate qualities for preservice health and welfare professionals for collaborative prevention and early intervention for child maltreatment: A qualitative study Using virtual patient simulation with partial task trainer: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1