Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration
{"title":"Nursing students’ perceived ability to practice interprofessional collaboration after the inclusion of virtual and immersion interprofessional education activities: A quantitative exploration","authors":"Jill M.G. Bally , Shelley Spurr , Karen Juckes , Erick McNair , Heather Hodgson-Viden , Prosanta Mondal , Roona Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about the influence of interprofessional education (IPE) on interprofessional collaboration (IPC), particularly following the COVID 19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To examine nursing students’ perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities founded on the competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A cross-sectional design was used.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Third year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including: Demographic items, the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment (IPEC) (Version 3). Students completed reflective questions about their IPE experiences. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, confidence intervals, and point estimates were used to measure the differences from pre- to post-participation for all items of the ICCAS and IPEC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants reported improved IPC competence on every item and overall, after the IPE activities. Participants from urban campuses had lower ICCAS scores (PE 0.38, 95 % CI, 0.12–0.65) than those from rural campuses (PE 0.45 95 % CI, 0.18–0.72). Students who identified as men had higher team functioning scores before participating in the IPE activities than women (PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05–0.95). The IPEC Interaction items mean score was 4.03 ±.50 and IPE values items were higher with a mean of 4.62 ± 0.46.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings can guide development and implementation of IPE experiences for nursing and allied healthcare students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Little is known about the influence of interprofessional education (IPE) on interprofessional collaboration (IPC), particularly following the COVID 19 pandemic.
Aim
To examine nursing students’ perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities founded on the competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.
Design
A cross-sectional design was used.
Methods
Third year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including: Demographic items, the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS) and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self-Assessment (IPEC) (Version 3). Students completed reflective questions about their IPE experiences. Descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, confidence intervals, and point estimates were used to measure the differences from pre- to post-participation for all items of the ICCAS and IPEC.
Results
Participants reported improved IPC competence on every item and overall, after the IPE activities. Participants from urban campuses had lower ICCAS scores (PE 0.38, 95 % CI, 0.12–0.65) than those from rural campuses (PE 0.45 95 % CI, 0.18–0.72). Students who identified as men had higher team functioning scores before participating in the IPE activities than women (PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05–0.95). The IPEC Interaction items mean score was 4.03 ±.50 and IPE values items were higher with a mean of 4.62 ± 0.46.
Conclusions
The findings can guide development and implementation of IPE experiences for nursing and allied healthcare students.
Aim To examine nursing students' perceived ability to practice IPC after exposure to virtual lectures and immersive clinical IPE activities based on competencies from the National Interprofessional Competency Framework.DesignA crosssectional design was used.MethodsThird year nursing students (n=105) enrolled in a pediatric theory and clinical completed surveys including:调查内容包括:人口统计学项目、修订版专业间协作能力达成情况调查(ICCAS)和专业间教育协作能力自我评估(IPEC)(第 3 版)。学生完成了有关其 IPE 经验的反思性问题。使用描述性统计、配对 t 检验、置信区间和点估计来测量 ICCAS 和 IPEC 所有项目从参与前到参与后的差异。来自城市校园的参与者的 ICCAS 分数(PE 0.38,95 % CI,0.12-0.65)低于来自农村校园的参与者(PE 0.45,95 % CI,0.18-0.72)。与女生相比,男生在参加 IPE 活动前的团队功能得分更高(PE 0.50; 95 % CI,: 0.05-0.95)。IPEC互动项目平均得分为4.03±.50,IPE价值项目平均得分为4.62±0.46,IPE价值项目平均得分为4.62±0.46。
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.