Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103808
{"title":"Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Synchronizing creation and destruction in energy transition could be challenging, and the policy mixes might not be well coordinated. Preexisting studies have given state-centered interpretations to the misalignment between the ‘creative’ and ‘destructive’ efforts. Complementing the state-centered perspectives, this paper tries to offer an alternative explanation from the lens of the political-economic rationality of the state-owned power companies (SPCs) at the micro-level. The analysis uncovers a blend of strategies through which SPCs navigate the intricate landscape of the transition mandates, including (1) engaging in territory competition, (2) utilizing natural gas to adjust the pace of transition, (3) planning renewable energy investment sequences, (4) implementing supply chain management, and (5) deploying financial innovations. Out of these strategies emerge the multifaceted roles of the incumbents, who occupy a dynamic space that lies between being barriers and serving as enablers. The complex interplay and possible discordance between government intervention and the incumbents' responses introduce elements of complexity and unpredictability into the transition process. These findings call for the integration of macro- and micro-scale perspectives to ensure that policies and interventions are robust enough to accommodate both anticipated and unforeseen challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Synchronizing creation and destruction in energy transition could be challenging, and the policy mixes might not be well coordinated. Preexisting studies have given state-centered interpretations to the misalignment between the ‘creative’ and ‘destructive’ efforts. Complementing the state-centered perspectives, this paper tries to offer an alternative explanation from the lens of the political-economic rationality of the state-owned power companies (SPCs) at the micro-level. The analysis uncovers a blend of strategies through which SPCs navigate the intricate landscape of the transition mandates, including (1) engaging in territory competition, (2) utilizing natural gas to adjust the pace of transition, (3) planning renewable energy investment sequences, (4) implementing supply chain management, and (5) deploying financial innovations. Out of these strategies emerge the multifaceted roles of the incumbents, who occupy a dynamic space that lies between being barriers and serving as enablers. The complex interplay and possible discordance between government intervention and the incumbents' responses introduce elements of complexity and unpredictability into the transition process. These findings call for the integration of macro- and micro-scale perspectives to ensure that policies and interventions are robust enough to accommodate both anticipated and unforeseen challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推动者还是障碍?发电企业在中国能源转型中的多重故事
在能源转型过程中同步进行创造和破坏可能具有挑战性,政策组合可能无法很好地协调。对于 "创造性 "和 "破坏性 "努力之间的不协调,已有研究给出了以国家为中心的解释。作为对以国家为中心的观点的补充,本文试图从微观层面上国有电力公司的政治经济理性角度提供另一种解释。分析揭示了国有电力公司在错综复杂的转型任务中采取的一系列策略,包括(1)参与地区竞争,(2)利用天然气调整转型步伐,(3)规划可再生能源投资序列,(4)实施供应链管理,以及(5)部署金融创新。在这些战略中,现任者扮演着多方面的角色,他们占据着一个既是障碍又是推动者的动态空间。政府干预与在职者应对之间复杂的相互作用和可能的不协调为转型过程带来了复杂性和不可预测性。这些研究结果要求将宏观和微观视角结合起来,以确保政策和干预措施足够有力,既能应对预期的挑战,也能应对不可预见的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Making space for environmental justice in renewable energy planning Large inequalities in climate mitigation scenarios are not supported by theories of distributive justice Embracing complexity: Microgrids and community engagement in Australia Policy mixes for net-zero energy transitions: Insights from energy sector integration in Germany Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1