CFD simulation and experimental study on the flow field and typical energetic dust dispersion in the 5 L column vessel

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105473
{"title":"CFD simulation and experimental study on the flow field and typical energetic dust dispersion in the 5 L column vessel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The explosion of energetic dust is more hazardous than general industrial dust, but there was a dearth of suitable equipment for measuring the explosion characteristics of energetic dust. At present, a 5 L column vessel can be used to measure the explosion characteristics of energetic dust has been created. This study examined the internal flow field and dispersion pattens of RDX dust with different particle sizes within the 5L vessel by combining CFD simulation and experiments. The results demonstrated that the flow field underwent a transformation following the introduction of RDX dust, accompanied by a notable decline in turbulence level and velocity within the vessel, and the comparison of simulation and experimental results showed that the valve weakened the airflow. The large-sized (Class-II) dust showed significant settling and more independent motion trajectory, whereas the small-sized (Class-V) dust formed a dust column in the central line of the vessel and showed better suspension, but the flow field exhibited a lack of symmetry. The optimal ignition delay time was 70 ms, and in the 70 ± 10 ms interval, the distribution of Class-II dust was more uniform. Compared with the existing 20 L spherical vessel, the 5 L vessel exhibited a markedly lower but more uniform turbulence level, and the dust distribution was significantly improved, meanwhile solved the problems of dust accumulation in the pipeline and particle size change. This study provides an important reference for the further research of 5 L column vessel and proves that it can achieve higher safety and accuracy in energetic dust explosion experiment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024002316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explosion of energetic dust is more hazardous than general industrial dust, but there was a dearth of suitable equipment for measuring the explosion characteristics of energetic dust. At present, a 5 L column vessel can be used to measure the explosion characteristics of energetic dust has been created. This study examined the internal flow field and dispersion pattens of RDX dust with different particle sizes within the 5L vessel by combining CFD simulation and experiments. The results demonstrated that the flow field underwent a transformation following the introduction of RDX dust, accompanied by a notable decline in turbulence level and velocity within the vessel, and the comparison of simulation and experimental results showed that the valve weakened the airflow. The large-sized (Class-II) dust showed significant settling and more independent motion trajectory, whereas the small-sized (Class-V) dust formed a dust column in the central line of the vessel and showed better suspension, but the flow field exhibited a lack of symmetry. The optimal ignition delay time was 70 ms, and in the 70 ± 10 ms interval, the distribution of Class-II dust was more uniform. Compared with the existing 20 L spherical vessel, the 5 L vessel exhibited a markedly lower but more uniform turbulence level, and the dust distribution was significantly improved, meanwhile solved the problems of dust accumulation in the pipeline and particle size change. This study provides an important reference for the further research of 5 L column vessel and proves that it can achieve higher safety and accuracy in energetic dust explosion experiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5 L 柱形容器中的流场和典型高能粉尘弥散的 CFD 模拟和实验研究
高能粉尘的爆炸比一般工业粉尘更具危险性,但却缺乏测量高能粉尘爆炸特性的合适设备。目前,一种可用于测量高能粉尘爆炸特性的 5 L 柱形容器已经问世。本研究通过 CFD 模拟和实验相结合的方法,研究了不同粒径的 RDX 粉尘在 5 L 容器内的内部流场和分散模式。结果表明,在引入 RDX 粉尘后,流场发生了变化,容器内的湍流水平和速度明显下降,模拟结果和实验结果的比较表明,阀门削弱了气流。大粒径(II 级)粉尘沉降明显,运动轨迹更加独立,而小粒径(V 级)粉尘在容器中心线形成粉尘柱,悬浮效果较好,但流场缺乏对称性。最佳点火延迟时间为 70 毫秒,在 70 ± 10 毫秒的间隔内,II 类粉尘的分布较为均匀。与现有的 20 L 球形容器相比,5 L 容器的湍流水平明显降低,但更加均匀,粉尘分布得到明显改善,同时解决了粉尘在管道中的积聚和粒度变化问题。该研究为进一步研究 5 L 柱形容器提供了重要参考,证明其在高能粉尘爆炸实验中可实现更高的安全性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
期刊最新文献
CFD simulation and experimental study on the flow field and typical energetic dust dispersion in the 5 L column vessel Machine learning-based literature review on the concept of safety barriers against hazardous events Machine learning-based precise monitoring of aluminium-magnesium alloy dust Study on the inhibition of hydrogen explosion using gas-solid two-phase inhibitors Experimental investigation on the vented flame and pressure behaviour of hydrogen-air mixtures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1