Evaluating early predictive performance of machine learning approaches for engineering change schedule – A case study using predictive process monitoring techniques

Ognjen Radišić-Aberger, Peter Burggräf, Fabian Steinberg, Alexander Becher, Tim Weißer
{"title":"Evaluating early predictive performance of machine learning approaches for engineering change schedule – A case study using predictive process monitoring techniques","authors":"Ognjen Radišić-Aberger,&nbsp;Peter Burggräf,&nbsp;Fabian Steinberg,&nbsp;Alexander Becher,&nbsp;Tim Weißer","doi":"10.1016/j.sca.2024.100087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>By applying machine learning algorithms, predictive business process monitoring (PBPM) techniques provide an opportunity to counteract undesired outcomes of processes. An especially complex variation of business processes is the engineering change (EC) process. Here, failing to adhere to planned implementation dates can have severe impacts on assembly lines, and it is paramount that potential negative cases are identified as early as possible. Current PBPM research, however, has seldomly investigated the predictive performance of machine learning approaches and their applicability at early process steps, let alone for the EC process. In our research, we show that given adequate feature encoding, shallow learners can accurately predict schedule adherence after process initialisation. Based on EC data from an automotive manufacturer, we provide a case sensitive performance overview on algorithm-encoding combinations. For that, three algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, LSTM) were combined with four encoding techniques. The encoding techniques used were the two common aggregation-based and index-based last state encoding, and two new combinations of these, which we term advanced aggregation-based and complex aggregation-based encoding. The study indicates that XGBoost-index-encoded approaches outclass regarding average predictive performance, whereas Random-Forest-aggregation-encoded approaches perform better regarding temporal stability due to reduced influence by dynamic features. Our research provides a case-based reasoning approach for deciding on which algorithm-encoding combination and evaluation metrics to apply. In doing so, we provide a blueprint for an early warning and monitoring method within the EC process and other similarly complex processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101186,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Analytics","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100087"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294986352400030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By applying machine learning algorithms, predictive business process monitoring (PBPM) techniques provide an opportunity to counteract undesired outcomes of processes. An especially complex variation of business processes is the engineering change (EC) process. Here, failing to adhere to planned implementation dates can have severe impacts on assembly lines, and it is paramount that potential negative cases are identified as early as possible. Current PBPM research, however, has seldomly investigated the predictive performance of machine learning approaches and their applicability at early process steps, let alone for the EC process. In our research, we show that given adequate feature encoding, shallow learners can accurately predict schedule adherence after process initialisation. Based on EC data from an automotive manufacturer, we provide a case sensitive performance overview on algorithm-encoding combinations. For that, three algorithms (XGBoost, Random Forest, LSTM) were combined with four encoding techniques. The encoding techniques used were the two common aggregation-based and index-based last state encoding, and two new combinations of these, which we term advanced aggregation-based and complex aggregation-based encoding. The study indicates that XGBoost-index-encoded approaches outclass regarding average predictive performance, whereas Random-Forest-aggregation-encoded approaches perform better regarding temporal stability due to reduced influence by dynamic features. Our research provides a case-based reasoning approach for deciding on which algorithm-encoding combination and evaluation metrics to apply. In doing so, we provide a blueprint for an early warning and monitoring method within the EC process and other similarly complex processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估机器学习方法对工程变更时间表的早期预测性能--利用预测性流程监控技术的案例研究
通过应用机器学习算法,预测性业务流程监控(PBPM)技术为抵消流程的不良结果提供了机会。工程变更 (EC) 流程是业务流程中一个特别复杂的变种。在这里,不遵守计划实施日期会对装配线造成严重影响,因此尽早识别潜在的负面情况至关重要。然而,当前的 PBPM 研究很少研究机器学习方法的预测性能及其在早期流程步骤中的适用性,更不用说在 EC 流程中了。在我们的研究中,我们发现,如果有足够的特征编码,浅层学习器可以在流程初始化后准确预测计划的执行情况。基于一家汽车制造商的 EC 数据,我们提供了算法-编码组合的案例敏感性能概览。为此,我们将三种算法(XGBoost、随机森林、LSTM)与四种编码技术相结合。使用的编码技术包括两种常见的基于聚合的编码和基于索引的最后状态编码,以及这两种编码的两种新组合,我们称之为基于高级聚合的编码和基于复杂聚合的编码。研究表明,XGBoost-索引编码方法在平均预测性能方面更胜一筹,而随机森林-聚合编码方法由于减少了动态特征的影响,在时间稳定性方面表现更好。我们的研究提供了一种基于案例的推理方法,用于决定采用哪种算法-编码组合和评价指标。这样,我们就为欧盟委员会流程和其他类似复杂流程中的预警和监控方法提供了一个蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Integrated Multi-Product Biodiesel and Bioethanol Supply Chain Model with Torrefaction Under Uncertainty An agility and performance assessment framework for supply chains using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling A conceptual digital twin framework for supply chain recovery and resilience A strategic and social analytics model for sustainable packaging in the cosmetic industry A multi-step mixed integer programming heuristic for warehouse layout optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1