Can long-term institutional owners improve market efficiency in parsing complex legal disputes?

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Economics & Finance Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2024.103690
Paul Borochin , Xiaoqiong Wang , Siqi Wei
{"title":"Can long-term institutional owners improve market efficiency in parsing complex legal disputes?","authors":"Paul Borochin ,&nbsp;Xiaoqiong Wang ,&nbsp;Siqi Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2024.103690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Long-horizon institutional investors can help mitigate information asymmetries around securities class action (SCA) lawsuits. We find that the machine readability of SCA complaint filings can predict the outcome and duration of class actions. Long-term institutional investor ownership leads to a more positive post-SCA announcement price reaction and increases the volatility ratio of prices as a measure of price informativeness. Furthermore, there is a significant interaction effect between long-term institutional ownership and SCA complexity on price informativeness consistent with a superior information processing ability about complex corporate events affecting portfolio firms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 103690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024006828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-horizon institutional investors can help mitigate information asymmetries around securities class action (SCA) lawsuits. We find that the machine readability of SCA complaint filings can predict the outcome and duration of class actions. Long-term institutional investor ownership leads to a more positive post-SCA announcement price reaction and increases the volatility ratio of prices as a measure of price informativeness. Furthermore, there is a significant interaction effect between long-term institutional ownership and SCA complexity on price informativeness consistent with a superior information processing ability about complex corporate events affecting portfolio firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期机构所有者能否在解析复杂法律纠纷时提高市场效率?
长线机构投资者有助于缓解围绕证券集体诉讼(SCA)的信息不对称问题。我们发现,SCA 投诉文件的机器可读性可以预测集体诉讼的结果和持续时间。长期机构投资者所有权会导致证券集体诉讼公告后的价格反应更加积极,并提高价格的波动率,以此衡量价格的信息性。此外,长期机构投资者所有权和 SCA 复杂性对价格信息性有明显的交互影响,这与影响投资组合公司的复杂公司事件的卓越信息处理能力相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
期刊最新文献
The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance Can long-term institutional owners improve market efficiency in parsing complex legal disputes? How does data factor utilization stimulate corporate total factor productivity: A discussion of the productivity paradox The local government fiscal pressure's effect on green total factor productivity: Exploring mechanisms from the perspective of government behavior Big data development and enterprise green innovation: Text analysis of listed companies’ annual reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1