“Take no risk!”: Immediate and delayed backfire-effect of risk-reducing messages in retailers' return and exchange policies

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104134
Antonin Woimant , Nadia Steils
{"title":"“Take no risk!”: Immediate and delayed backfire-effect of risk-reducing messages in retailers' return and exchange policies","authors":"Antonin Woimant ,&nbsp;Nadia Steils","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While much research highlights the positive effects of appropriate risk framing in online retail advertising, this study reveals its potential adverse impact on consumer purchase decisions, particularly when communicating retailers' return and exchange policies. We conducted four studies, including three distinct field experiments in partnership with a major online retailer, to explore immediate and deferred consumer behaviors - advertising engagement and actual purchases - across over 452,632 consumers, and one controlled online experiment to test the proposed hypotheses. Studies 1a and 1b examined the short-term adverse effects of reassuring risk framing on immediate advertising engagement, and Study 2 assessed its impact on delayed decisions (actual purchase). Study 3 provided insights into the underlying psychological mechanisms using the persuasion knowledge theory. Our findings indicate that framing messages such as “take no risk” can diminish advertising engagement and actual purchasing behavior, because of greater persuasion knowledge. Advertisers are advised to carefully evaluate the use of risk-reducing messages in their communication to avoid unintended negative impacts on both advertising engagement and actual purchase behavior. This study enriches the advertising literature by uncovering the backfiring effects of reassuring risk-reducing framing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104134"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924004302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While much research highlights the positive effects of appropriate risk framing in online retail advertising, this study reveals its potential adverse impact on consumer purchase decisions, particularly when communicating retailers' return and exchange policies. We conducted four studies, including three distinct field experiments in partnership with a major online retailer, to explore immediate and deferred consumer behaviors - advertising engagement and actual purchases - across over 452,632 consumers, and one controlled online experiment to test the proposed hypotheses. Studies 1a and 1b examined the short-term adverse effects of reassuring risk framing on immediate advertising engagement, and Study 2 assessed its impact on delayed decisions (actual purchase). Study 3 provided insights into the underlying psychological mechanisms using the persuasion knowledge theory. Our findings indicate that framing messages such as “take no risk” can diminish advertising engagement and actual purchasing behavior, because of greater persuasion knowledge. Advertisers are advised to carefully evaluate the use of risk-reducing messages in their communication to avoid unintended negative impacts on both advertising engagement and actual purchase behavior. This study enriches the advertising literature by uncovering the backfiring effects of reassuring risk-reducing framing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"不要冒险!":零售商退换货政策中降低风险信息的即时和延迟反作用力
很多研究都强调了适当的风险框架在网络零售广告中的积极作用,而本研究则揭示了其对消费者购买决策的潜在不利影响,尤其是在传达零售商的退换货政策时。我们进行了四项研究,包括与一家大型在线零售商合作进行的三项不同的现场实验,以探索超过452,632名消费者的即时和延迟消费行为--广告参与和实际购买,以及一项受控在线实验,以检验提出的假设。研究 1a 和 1b 考察了安抚性风险框架对即时广告参与的短期不利影响,研究 2 评估了其对延迟决策(实际购买)的影响。研究 3 利用说服知识理论深入探讨了潜在的心理机制。我们的研究结果表明,"不冒任何风险 "等框架信息会降低广告参与度和实际购买行为,因为说服知识越强。我们建议广告商在传播过程中仔细评估降低风险信息的使用,以避免对广告参与度和实际购买行为产生意想不到的负面影响。本研究揭示了安抚性风险降低框架的反作用,从而丰富了广告文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1