Comparative microanatomy and histology of spinal and cerebral veins: Implications for dural arteriovenous fistula clinical presentations

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1016/j.tice.2024.102597
Etienne Lefevre , Mégane Le Quang , Vincent Jecko , Maxime Nogues , Dominique Liguoro , Franck Bielle , Paul Roblot
{"title":"Comparative microanatomy and histology of spinal and cerebral veins: Implications for dural arteriovenous fistula clinical presentations","authors":"Etienne Lefevre ,&nbsp;Mégane Le Quang ,&nbsp;Vincent Jecko ,&nbsp;Maxime Nogues ,&nbsp;Dominique Liguoro ,&nbsp;Franck Bielle ,&nbsp;Paul Roblot","doi":"10.1016/j.tice.2024.102597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) that display cortical venous drainage are at risk of hemorrhage, unlike spinal DAVFs, which seldom bleed. The underlying mechanism for this difference is poorly understood. We hypothesized that cerebral veins are more fragile than spinal veins due to differences in histologic compositions. Thus, spinal and cerebral veins from five formalin-fixed human cadavers were examined through macroscopic and histological analysis, using hematoxylin, eosin and safran (HES), and orcein stains to compare them. Twenty-four cerebral veins and thirteen spinal veins were analyzed. The mean diameter of the cerebral veins was 1.02 ± 0.59 mm, while that of spinal veins was 0.52 ± 0.26 mm (p = 0.003). The mean thickness of cerebral veins was similar to their spinal counterparts (0.09 ± 0.07 mm vs 0.06 ± 0.02 mm; p = 0.12). The mean diameter-to-thickness ratio was 13.76 ± 6.05 mm for cerebral veins and 10.06 ± 7.23 mm for spinal veins (p = 0.023). In most of the analyzed vessels, the venous wall was composed of endothelial cells resting on layers of smooth muscle, separated by elastica lamina. Cerebral and spinal veins exhibit distinct calibers while maintaining comparable wall thicknesses, resulting in a greater diameter-to-thickness ratio for cerebral veins compared to spinal veins. This difference may after their resistance to pressure. Furthermore, variations in the transparietal pressure gradient between cranial and spinal subarachnoid space, along with differences in arterial blood flow through the fistulous veins, might contribute to the observed differences in clinical presentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040816624002982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) that display cortical venous drainage are at risk of hemorrhage, unlike spinal DAVFs, which seldom bleed. The underlying mechanism for this difference is poorly understood. We hypothesized that cerebral veins are more fragile than spinal veins due to differences in histologic compositions. Thus, spinal and cerebral veins from five formalin-fixed human cadavers were examined through macroscopic and histological analysis, using hematoxylin, eosin and safran (HES), and orcein stains to compare them. Twenty-four cerebral veins and thirteen spinal veins were analyzed. The mean diameter of the cerebral veins was 1.02 ± 0.59 mm, while that of spinal veins was 0.52 ± 0.26 mm (p = 0.003). The mean thickness of cerebral veins was similar to their spinal counterparts (0.09 ± 0.07 mm vs 0.06 ± 0.02 mm; p = 0.12). The mean diameter-to-thickness ratio was 13.76 ± 6.05 mm for cerebral veins and 10.06 ± 7.23 mm for spinal veins (p = 0.023). In most of the analyzed vessels, the venous wall was composed of endothelial cells resting on layers of smooth muscle, separated by elastica lamina. Cerebral and spinal veins exhibit distinct calibers while maintaining comparable wall thicknesses, resulting in a greater diameter-to-thickness ratio for cerebral veins compared to spinal veins. This difference may after their resistance to pressure. Furthermore, variations in the transparietal pressure gradient between cranial and spinal subarachnoid space, along with differences in arterial blood flow through the fistulous veins, might contribute to the observed differences in clinical presentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓静脉和大脑静脉的显微解剖学和组织学比较:对硬脑膜动静脉瘘临床表现的启示
显示皮质静脉引流的颅硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)有出血的风险,而脊髓动静脉瘘(DAVF)很少出血。造成这种差异的潜在机制尚不清楚。我们假设,由于组织学成分的差异,脑静脉比脊髓静脉更脆弱。因此,我们对五具福尔马林固定的人体尸体上的脊髓静脉和大脑静脉进行了宏观和组织学分析,并使用苏木精、伊红和沙夫兰(HES)以及orcein染色法对它们进行了比较。共分析了二十四条脑静脉和十三条脊静脉。脑静脉的平均直径为 1.02 ± 0.59 毫米,而脊静脉的平均直径为 0.52 ± 0.26 毫米(P = 0.003)。脑静脉的平均厚度与脊静脉相似(0.09 ± 0.07 mm vs 0.06 ± 0.02 mm; p = 0.12)。脑静脉的平均直径-厚度比为 13.76 ± 6.05 毫米,脊静脉为 10.06 ± 7.23 毫米(p = 0.023)。在大多数被分析的血管中,静脉壁由内皮细胞和平滑肌层组成,平滑肌层之间由弹性层隔开。脑静脉和脊髓静脉的口径不同,但管壁厚度相当,因此脑静脉的直径与厚度之比大于脊髓静脉。这种差异可能会影响它们的抗压能力。此外,颅内和脊髓蛛网膜下腔之间跨椎压力梯度的变化,以及动脉血流流经瘘管静脉的差异,也可能是造成临床表现差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1