Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains

Niloufar Izadi , Fateme Aghamir
{"title":"Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains","authors":"Niloufar Izadi ,&nbsp;Fateme Aghamir","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2024.100172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the data gap between researchers and farmers in soil fertility assessment, there are similarities and coincidences between the achievements of scientific versus local assessments. Farmers’ land management practices are a function of perceived soil fertility assessment in day-to-day management decisions. Despite the efforts made, studies have yielded different results when comparing soil fertility assessments in terms of indigenous and scientific knowledge, thus calling for closer assessments using extensive creative and systematic approaches. The current study uses Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) to propose efficiency indicators based on the weighting of familiar, organizational, or productive variables in groups evaluating indigenous, scientific, and data variability. The end goal is to help identify the decision-makers’ training needs and decide on future institutional endeavors for developing productive skills and adopting better measures to evaluate soil fertility. By combining indigenous knowledge with innovations and improving the relationship between scientists and indigenous peoples and also promoting collaboration, thinking, and knowledge acquisition of farmers on how to maintain soil fertility and health, we hope to move towards sustainable agriculture as an institutional reform.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006224000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the data gap between researchers and farmers in soil fertility assessment, there are similarities and coincidences between the achievements of scientific versus local assessments. Farmers’ land management practices are a function of perceived soil fertility assessment in day-to-day management decisions. Despite the efforts made, studies have yielded different results when comparing soil fertility assessments in terms of indigenous and scientific knowledge, thus calling for closer assessments using extensive creative and systematic approaches. The current study uses Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) to propose efficiency indicators based on the weighting of familiar, organizational, or productive variables in groups evaluating indigenous, scientific, and data variability. The end goal is to help identify the decision-makers’ training needs and decide on future institutional endeavors for developing productive skills and adopting better measures to evaluate soil fertility. By combining indigenous knowledge with innovations and improving the relationship between scientists and indigenous peoples and also promoting collaboration, thinking, and knowledge acquisition of farmers on how to maintain soil fertility and health, we hope to move towards sustainable agriculture as an institutional reform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多因素分析法在阿尔伯兹中部山区土壤质量绩效评估中整合本地知识和正规知识
尽管研究人员与农民在土壤肥力评估方面存在数据差距,但科学评估与地方评估的成果之间存在相似性和重合性。农民的土地管理实践是在日常管理决策中对土壤肥力评估的感知。尽管做出了努力,但在比较本土和科学知识方面的土壤肥力评估时,研究得出了不同的结果,因此需要利用广泛的创造性和系统性方法进行更密切的评估。目前的研究采用多因素分析法(MFA),根据熟悉的、组织的或生产的变量在评估本土、科学和数据可变性的组中的权重,提出效率指标。最终目标是帮助确定决策者的培训需求,并决定未来机构在发展生产技能和采用更好的土壤肥力评估措施方面的努力。通过将本土知识与创新相结合,改善科学家与本土人民之间的关系,同时促进农民在如何保持土壤肥力和健康方面的合作、思考和知识获取,我们希望将可持续农业作为一项机构改革来推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
期刊最新文献
Heavy metal pollution in farmland soils surrounding mining areas in China and the response of soil microbial communities Integration of indigenous and formal knowledge in the assessment of soil quality performance assessment using multiple factor analysis in Alborz central mountains Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in Maryland Using MIR and XRF spectroscopy to develop a heavy metal leaching potential model in Irish top soils Erratum regarding missing Conflict of Interest (COI) Statements in previously published articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1