Homomorphisms between problem spaces

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Mathematical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102888
Andrea Brancaccio, Luca Stefanutti
{"title":"Homomorphisms between problem spaces","authors":"Andrea Brancaccio,&nbsp;Luca Stefanutti","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2024.102888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In procedural knowledge space theory (PKST), a “problem space” is a formal representation of the knowledge that is needed for solving all of the problems of a certain type. The competence state of a real problem solver is a subset of the problem space which satisfies a specific condition, named the “sub-path assumption”. There could exist specific “symmetries” in a problem space that make certain parts of it “equivalent” up to those symmetries. Whenever an equivalence relation is introduced for elements in a problem space, the question almost naturally arises whether the collection of the induced equivalence classes forms, itself, a problem space. This is the main question addressed in the present article, which is restated as the problem of defining a homomorphism of one problem space into another problem space. Two types of homomorphisms are examined, which are named the “strong” and the “weak homomorphism”. The former corresponds to the usual notion of “operation preserving mapping”. The latter preserves operations in only one direction. Two algorithms are developed for testing the existence of homomorphisms between problem spaces. The notions and algorithms are illustrated in a series of three examples in which quite well-known neuro-psychological and cognitive tests are employed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022249624000579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In procedural knowledge space theory (PKST), a “problem space” is a formal representation of the knowledge that is needed for solving all of the problems of a certain type. The competence state of a real problem solver is a subset of the problem space which satisfies a specific condition, named the “sub-path assumption”. There could exist specific “symmetries” in a problem space that make certain parts of it “equivalent” up to those symmetries. Whenever an equivalence relation is introduced for elements in a problem space, the question almost naturally arises whether the collection of the induced equivalence classes forms, itself, a problem space. This is the main question addressed in the present article, which is restated as the problem of defining a homomorphism of one problem space into another problem space. Two types of homomorphisms are examined, which are named the “strong” and the “weak homomorphism”. The former corresponds to the usual notion of “operation preserving mapping”. The latter preserves operations in only one direction. Two algorithms are developed for testing the existence of homomorphisms between problem spaces. The notions and algorithms are illustrated in a series of three examples in which quite well-known neuro-psychological and cognitive tests are employed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问题空间之间的同构
在程序性知识空间理论(PKST)中,"问题空间 "是解决某一类型的所有问题所需的知识的形式化表示。实际问题解决者的能力状态是问题空间的一个子集,它满足一个特定条件,即 "子路径假设"。问题空间中可能存在特定的 "对称性",使得问题空间的某些部分在这些对称性范围内 "等价"。每当为问题空间中的元素引入等价关系时,就会自然而然地产生这样一个问题:诱导等价类的集合本身是否构成一个问题空间。这就是本文所要探讨的主要问题,它被重述为定义一个问题空间到另一个问题空间的同态问题。本文研究了两类同构,分别命名为 "强同构 "和 "弱同构"。前者对应于通常的 "操作保留映射 "概念。后者只在一个方向上保留操作。我们开发了两种算法来测试问题空间之间是否存在同构。这两个概念和算法在三个例子中进行了说明,这三个例子采用了非常著名的神经心理学和认知测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Journal of Mathematical Psychology 医学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mathematical Psychology includes articles, monographs and reviews, notes and commentaries, and book reviews in all areas of mathematical psychology. Empirical and theoretical contributions are equally welcome. Areas of special interest include, but are not limited to, fundamental measurement and psychological process models, such as those based upon neural network or information processing concepts. A partial listing of substantive areas covered include sensation and perception, psychophysics, learning and memory, problem solving, judgment and decision-making, and motivation. The Journal of Mathematical Psychology is affiliated with the Society for Mathematical Psychology. Research Areas include: • Models for sensation and perception, learning, memory and thinking • Fundamental measurement and scaling • Decision making • Neural modeling and networks • Psychophysics and signal detection • Neuropsychological theories • Psycholinguistics • Motivational dynamics • Animal behavior • Psychometric theory
期刊最新文献
Remarks on learning spaces On using the fixed-point property of binary mixtures to discriminate among models of recognition memory Homomorphisms between problem spaces On the mathematical formalization of the Inhibited Elements Model Understanding the geometrical properties of an Ames room and controlling it systematically and quantitatively
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1