Quantifying cellulose content in plastic-cellulose material mixtures

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD Cellulose Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s10570-024-06187-y
Emilia Kauppi, Jukka Niskanen, Eero Hiltunen, Jouni Paltakari
{"title":"Quantifying cellulose content in plastic-cellulose material mixtures","authors":"Emilia Kauppi,&nbsp;Jukka Niskanen,&nbsp;Eero Hiltunen,&nbsp;Jouni Paltakari","doi":"10.1007/s10570-024-06187-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the capabilities of various measurement techniques for quantifying the cellulose content in reject material from a carton recycling center, which consists of polyethylene, cellulose, and aluminum, along with impurities. Different measurement techniques, including Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy combined with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR), cellulose dissolution using cupri-ethylenediamine (CED) from plastic followed by gravimetric analysis, acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography, and Thermal Gravimetric Analysis TGA, are employed in this study. Acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography and TGA shows comparable results when compared to different techniques for analyzing pulper reject. Dissolution with CED showed also comparable results but shows higher variation than TGA or chromatography. FTIR absorbance ratio of 1025/2917 correlates with cellulose content, but it shows high variation and lacks sensitivity below 5% cellulose content in polyethylene. This limitation is attributed to factors such as the limited measurement area (1.8 mm) and the large particle size of the cellulose and LDPE mixtures, possibly caused by inadequate grinding of LDPE. In conclusion, TGA and acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography are the most reliable for quantifying cellulose content in recycling reject, providing more consistent and accurate results than FTIR-ATR or CED dissolution methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":511,"journal":{"name":"Cellulose","volume":"31 16","pages":"9613 - 9621"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10570-024-06187-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellulose","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-024-06187-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, PAPER & WOOD","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the capabilities of various measurement techniques for quantifying the cellulose content in reject material from a carton recycling center, which consists of polyethylene, cellulose, and aluminum, along with impurities. Different measurement techniques, including Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy combined with Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR), cellulose dissolution using cupri-ethylenediamine (CED) from plastic followed by gravimetric analysis, acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography, and Thermal Gravimetric Analysis TGA, are employed in this study. Acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography and TGA shows comparable results when compared to different techniques for analyzing pulper reject. Dissolution with CED showed also comparable results but shows higher variation than TGA or chromatography. FTIR absorbance ratio of 1025/2917 correlates with cellulose content, but it shows high variation and lacks sensitivity below 5% cellulose content in polyethylene. This limitation is attributed to factors such as the limited measurement area (1.8 mm) and the large particle size of the cellulose and LDPE mixtures, possibly caused by inadequate grinding of LDPE. In conclusion, TGA and acid hydrolysis combined with chromatography are the most reliable for quantifying cellulose content in recycling reject, providing more consistent and accurate results than FTIR-ATR or CED dissolution methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化塑料-纤维素材料混合物中的纤维素含量
本研究调查了各种测量技术在量化纸箱回收中心废料中纤维素含量方面的能力,废料由聚乙烯、纤维素、铝和杂质组成。本研究采用了不同的测量技术,包括傅立叶变换红外光谱结合衰减全反射(FTIR-ATR)、使用铜-乙二胺(CED)从塑料中溶解纤维素然后进行重量分析、酸水解结合色谱法以及热重量分析法(TGA)。与分析碎浆机废料的不同技术相比,酸水解结合色谱法和热重分析法得出的结果具有可比性。用 CED 进行溶解也显示出相似的结果,但比 TGA 或色谱法显示出更大的差异。傅立叶变换红外吸收比 1025/2917 与纤维素含量相关,但在聚乙烯中纤维素含量低于 5%时,变化较大,灵敏度较低。造成这种局限性的因素包括测量面积有限(1.8 毫米)以及纤维素和低密度聚乙烯混合物的粒度较大,这可能是由于低密度聚乙烯研磨不充分造成的。总之,TGA 和酸水解结合色谱法是量化回收废料中纤维素含量的最可靠方法,其结果比傅立叶变换红外-ATR 或 CED 溶解法更加一致和准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cellulose
Cellulose 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
580
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cellulose is an international journal devoted to the dissemination of research and scientific and technological progress in the field of cellulose and related naturally occurring polymers. The journal is concerned with the pure and applied science of cellulose and related materials, and also with the development of relevant new technologies. This includes the chemistry, biochemistry, physics and materials science of cellulose and its sources, including wood and other biomass resources, and their derivatives. Coverage extends to the conversion of these polymers and resources into manufactured goods, such as pulp, paper, textiles, and manufactured as well natural fibers, and to the chemistry of materials used in their processing. Cellulose publishes review articles, research papers, and technical notes.
期刊最新文献
Applications of regenerated bacterial cellulose: a review Designing biodegradable and antibacterial cellulose-based superhydrophobic packaging materials via large-scale self-assembly Correction: Influence of density and chemical additives on paper mechanical properties Reaction behavior of solid acid catalytic cellulose acetylation Dowel bearing behavior of bamboo scrimber under different load-to-face grain angle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1