COVID-19 vaccine evidence monitoring assisted by artificial Intelligence: An emergency system implemented by the Public Health Agency of Canada to capture and describe the trajectory of evolving pandemic vaccine literature

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine: X Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100575
Su Hyun Lim , Mona Hersi , Ramya Krishnan , Joshua Montroy, Bonnie Rook, Kelly Farrah, Yung-En Chung, Adrienne Stevens, Joseline Zafack, Eva Wong, Nicole Forbes, April Killikelly, Kelsey Young, Matthew Tunis
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine evidence monitoring assisted by artificial Intelligence: An emergency system implemented by the Public Health Agency of Canada to capture and describe the trajectory of evolving pandemic vaccine literature","authors":"Su Hyun Lim ,&nbsp;Mona Hersi ,&nbsp;Ramya Krishnan ,&nbsp;Joshua Montroy,&nbsp;Bonnie Rook,&nbsp;Kelly Farrah,&nbsp;Yung-En Chung,&nbsp;Adrienne Stevens,&nbsp;Joseline Zafack,&nbsp;Eva Wong,&nbsp;Nicole Forbes,&nbsp;April Killikelly,&nbsp;Kelsey Young,&nbsp;Matthew Tunis","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid accumulation of novel vaccine research evidence. As a means to monitor this evidence, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) created the <strong>E</strong>vidence e<strong>X</strong>traction <strong>T</strong>eam for <strong>R</strong>esearch <strong>A</strong>nalysis (<strong>EXTRA</strong>), which contributed to situational awareness in Canada through a bibliographic repository used to support decision-making by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization. We describe the process by which this literature was identified and catalogued, and provide an overview of characteristics in the identified literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To expedite the process, PHAC leveraged an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist in the screening and selection of relevant articles. Literature search results were initially screened by AI, then manually reviewed for relevance. Relevant articles were tagged using controlled vocabulary and stored in a bibliographic repository. This repository was analyzed to identify trends in vaccine research over time according to several key characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>As of December 31, 2023, EXTRA’s repository contained 19,050 articles relevant to PHAC’s immunization mandate. The majority of these articles (63.9 %) were identified between August 2021 and January 2023, with an average of 20 relevant articles added daily during this period. Nearly 14,000 articles reported on mRNA vaccines. Safety outcomes were most frequently reported (n = 8,289), followed by immunogenicity (n = 7,269) and efficacy/effectiveness (n = 3,246). COVID-19 vaccine literature output started to decrease in mid-2023, two years after the initial dramatic increase in mid-2021.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This hybrid (AI and human) approach was critical for PHAC situational awareness and the development of timely vaccine guidance in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the volume of data and analyses required, the AI-augmented processes made this massive undertaking manageable. Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine research patterns supports projections of research volume, type, and rate that will help predict resourcing and information needs to plan future emergency vaccine guidance activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224001487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid accumulation of novel vaccine research evidence. As a means to monitor this evidence, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) created the Evidence eXtraction Team for Research Analysis (EXTRA), which contributed to situational awareness in Canada through a bibliographic repository used to support decision-making by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization. We describe the process by which this literature was identified and catalogued, and provide an overview of characteristics in the identified literature.

Methods

To expedite the process, PHAC leveraged an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist in the screening and selection of relevant articles. Literature search results were initially screened by AI, then manually reviewed for relevance. Relevant articles were tagged using controlled vocabulary and stored in a bibliographic repository. This repository was analyzed to identify trends in vaccine research over time according to several key characteristics.

Results

As of December 31, 2023, EXTRA’s repository contained 19,050 articles relevant to PHAC’s immunization mandate. The majority of these articles (63.9 %) were identified between August 2021 and January 2023, with an average of 20 relevant articles added daily during this period. Nearly 14,000 articles reported on mRNA vaccines. Safety outcomes were most frequently reported (n = 8,289), followed by immunogenicity (n = 7,269) and efficacy/effectiveness (n = 3,246). COVID-19 vaccine literature output started to decrease in mid-2023, two years after the initial dramatic increase in mid-2021.

Conclusions

This hybrid (AI and human) approach was critical for PHAC situational awareness and the development of timely vaccine guidance in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the volume of data and analyses required, the AI-augmented processes made this massive undertaking manageable. Analysis of COVID-19 vaccine research patterns supports projections of research volume, type, and rate that will help predict resourcing and information needs to plan future emergency vaccine guidance activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 人工智能辅助疫苗证据监测:加拿大公共卫生局实施的应急系统,用于捕捉和描述大流行病疫苗文献的演变轨迹
背景COVID-19大流行导致新型疫苗研究证据迅速积累。作为监测这些证据的一种手段,加拿大公共卫生署(PHAC)成立了研究分析证据提取小组(EXTRA),该小组通过一个书目资料库为加拿大的态势感知做出了贡献,该资料库用于支持国家免疫咨询委员会的决策。为了加快这一过程,PHAC 利用人工智能 (AI) 工具协助筛选相关文章。人工智能对文献检索结果进行了初步筛选,然后对相关性进行人工审核。相关文章使用受控词汇进行标记,并存储在书目库中。结果截至 2023 年 12 月 31 日,EXTRA 的文献库中包含了 19,050 篇与 PHAC 免疫任务相关的文章。其中大部分文章(63.9%)是在 2021 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间发现的,在此期间平均每天新增 20 篇相关文章。近 14,000 篇文章报道了 mRNA 疫苗。安全性结果报道最多(8,289 篇),其次是免疫原性(7,269 篇)和效力/有效性(3,246 篇)。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这种混合(人工智能和人类)方法对于加拿大 PHAC 的态势感知和及时制定疫苗指南至关重要。考虑到所需的数据量和分析工作,人工智能辅助流程使这项庞大的工作变得易于管理。对 COVID-19 疫苗研究模式的分析支持对研究数量、类型和速度的预测,这将有助于预测资源和信息需求,从而规划未来的应急疫苗指导活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cost of the typhoid conjugate vaccine introduction through an integrated campaign and follow-on routine immunization in Malawi The cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination program among age-groups children, adults, and elderly in Europe: A systematic review COVID-19 vaccine or booster uptake and hesitancy for children aged 6 months–5 years in the United States: A national descriptive study using the household pulse survey between March and May 2023 Association between vaccination and persistent COVID-19-related symptoms among patients with mild Omicron infection: A prospective cohort study Lot quality assurance sampling for coverage evaluation of a new vaccine: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1