首页 > 最新文献

Vaccine: X最新文献

英文 中文
Development of identity assay for human papillomavirus genotypes using Simple Plex™ microfluidic automated ELISA
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100621
Kyle Esposito, Richard R. Rustandi, Matthew Schombs
The IVRP (In-vitro Relative Potency) assay is a sandwich-type immunoassay used to measure relative potency as well as identity for some vaccine products. However, this traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method is time consuming due to the labor-intensive hands-on approach especially for multivalent vaccine products such as Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Development of a quick and simple assay for specific and faster identification of all nine genotypes of Gardasil®9 HPV vaccine was evaluated using ProteinSimple's Simple Plex Ella™ technology which can assist in sample transport vial identification and drug product formulation. An analysis of cross-reactivity for each antibody against each HPV genotype was conducted and showed high specificity of the new assay. The technology employed confers the assay's extremely fast analysis turn-around-time in a high throughput atmosphere, the Ella™ is also designed to run each well in triplicate which allows for more samples to be analyzed on an individual plate, while using less reagents than the typical ELISA based assay. The Ella™ also has scalable plates if less or more samples need to be tested, therefore having high potential to replace the manual ELISA identity assay. The instrument operational process is completely automated, including all antibodies, samples additions, as well as all wash steps, enabling result generation in approximately an hour.
{"title":"Development of identity assay for human papillomavirus genotypes using Simple Plex™ microfluidic automated ELISA","authors":"Kyle Esposito,&nbsp;Richard R. Rustandi,&nbsp;Matthew Schombs","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100621","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100621","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The IVRP (In-vitro Relative Potency) assay is a sandwich-type immunoassay used to measure relative potency as well as identity for some vaccine products. However, this traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method is time consuming due to the labor-intensive hands-on approach especially for multivalent vaccine products such as Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Development of a quick and simple assay for specific and faster identification of all nine genotypes of Gardasil®9 HPV vaccine was evaluated using ProteinSimple's Simple Plex Ella™ technology which can assist in sample transport vial identification and drug product formulation. An analysis of cross-reactivity for each antibody against each HPV genotype was conducted and showed high specificity of the new assay. The technology employed confers the assay's extremely fast analysis turn-around-time in a high throughput atmosphere, the Ella™ is also designed to run each well in triplicate which allows for more samples to be analyzed on an individual plate, while using less reagents than the typical ELISA based assay. The Ella™ also has scalable plates if less or more samples need to be tested, therefore having high potential to replace the manual ELISA identity assay. The instrument operational process is completely automated, including all antibodies, samples additions, as well as all wash steps, enabling result generation in approximately an hour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143510195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623
Yuka Sugawara , Masao Iwagami , Kan Kikuchi , Toyohiro Hashiba , Sayaka Yabushita , Risa Hara , Toshio Hasegawa , Iino Yasuhiko , Masaomi Nangaku

Background

Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.

Results

There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.

Conclusions

This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Yuka Sugawara ,&nbsp;Masao Iwagami ,&nbsp;Kan Kikuchi ,&nbsp;Toyohiro Hashiba ,&nbsp;Sayaka Yabushita ,&nbsp;Risa Hara ,&nbsp;Toshio Hasegawa ,&nbsp;Iino Yasuhiko ,&nbsp;Masaomi Nangaku","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143510742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Social networks, environmental, and individual factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination and booster uptake– The prospective PRIME cohort study
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100626
Céline J.A. van Bilsen , Lisanne C.J. Steijvers , Stephanie Wagner , Demi M.E. Pagen , Senne M.C.E. Wijnen , Kevin Konings , Christian J.P.A. Hoebe , Annemarie Koster , Nicole H.T.M. Dukers-Muijrers

Background

Social networks (a person's social relationships) are important for health and in health behavior, including infection prevention behavior. This study aims to identify factors associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and booster uptake, focusing on social networks and community participation factors, the physical environment, and individual level factors.

Methods

In the PRIME longitudinal cohort study, we used online questionnaires to collect baseline data at the end of 2021, including participants' COVID-19 vaccination status and various factors, i.e., structural and functional social network characteristics (interpersonal factors), societal (social and physical living environment) community (work and social participation), and individual (sociodemographics, health) factors. At follow-up (summer of 2022), we measured COVID-19 booster uptake. Associations between the factors and vaccine and booster uptake were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

At baseline (N = 9501), COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 94 %. In vaccinated participants at follow-up (N = 3620), booster uptake was 91 %. Community and societal factors associated with (booster) vaccine uptake included social participation, higher neighborhood livability and walkability scores, and a moderate level of urbanization. Interpersonal factors included a larger social network size, network diversity, network density, and not living alone. Associated individual factors included age ≥ 60 years, male sex, college/university education, being born in the Netherlands, having chronic conditions, being a never/former smoker, higher health literacy, and no loneliness.

Conclusion

The social and physical environment are key in COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake. Health promotion and vaccination strategies should address the environmental context (community, societal and interpersonal factors) alongside individual-level factors to contribute to pandemic preparedness.
{"title":"Social networks, environmental, and individual factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination and booster uptake– The prospective PRIME cohort study","authors":"Céline J.A. van Bilsen ,&nbsp;Lisanne C.J. Steijvers ,&nbsp;Stephanie Wagner ,&nbsp;Demi M.E. Pagen ,&nbsp;Senne M.C.E. Wijnen ,&nbsp;Kevin Konings ,&nbsp;Christian J.P.A. Hoebe ,&nbsp;Annemarie Koster ,&nbsp;Nicole H.T.M. Dukers-Muijrers","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100626","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100626","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Social networks (a person's social relationships) are important for health and in health behavior, including infection prevention behavior. This study aims to identify factors associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and booster uptake, focusing on social networks and community participation factors, the physical environment, and individual level factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In the PRIME longitudinal cohort study, we used online questionnaires to collect baseline data at the end of 2021, including participants' COVID-19 vaccination status and various factors, i.e., structural and functional social network characteristics (interpersonal factors), societal (social and physical living environment) community (work and social participation), and individual (sociodemographics, health) factors. At follow-up (summer of 2022), we measured COVID-19 booster uptake. Associations between the factors and vaccine and booster uptake were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At baseline (<em>N</em> = 9501), COVID-19 vaccine uptake was 94 %. In vaccinated participants at follow-up (<em>N</em> = 3620), booster uptake was 91 %. Community and societal factors associated with (booster) vaccine uptake included social participation, higher neighborhood livability and walkability scores, and a moderate level of urbanization. Interpersonal factors included a larger social network size, network diversity, network density, and not living alone. Associated individual factors included age ≥ 60 years, male sex, college/university education, being born in the Netherlands, having chronic conditions, being a never/former smoker, higher health literacy, and no loneliness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The social and physical environment are key in COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake. Health promotion and vaccination strategies should address the environmental context (community, societal and interpersonal factors) alongside individual-level factors to contribute to pandemic preparedness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143487255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620
Elena Semino , Tara Coltman-Patel , William Dance , Zsófia Demjén , Richard Gleave , Alison Mackey

Background

While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.

Methods

A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).

Results

In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:
  • A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;
  • A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.
  • Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.

Conclusion

Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.
{"title":"‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Elena Semino ,&nbsp;Tara Coltman-Patel ,&nbsp;William Dance ,&nbsp;Zsófia Demjén ,&nbsp;Richard Gleave ,&nbsp;Alison Mackey","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.</div></span></li></ul></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143474433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving hepatitis a vaccination rate by reducing missed follow up vaccine appointments
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100618
Mariana Block , Alexander M. Sy
{"title":"Improving hepatitis a vaccination rate by reducing missed follow up vaccine appointments","authors":"Mariana Block ,&nbsp;Alexander M. Sy","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100618","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100618","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143427962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
HPV vaccine uptake by Young adults in Hanoi, Vietnam: A qualitative investigation
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100619
Nguyen Thi My Hao , Hoang Vo Ngoc Khanh , Pranee Liamputtong , Nguyen Khoi Quan , Andrew W. Taylor-Robinson

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized to cause not only cervical cancer but also several HPV-related sexually transmitted diseases in both sexes. Despite the effectiveness of HPV vaccines to prevent HPV-related sexually transmitted diseases, in 2021 only 12 % of Vietnamese females aged 15–29 were recorded as vaccinated, while information on males was underreported. This paper aimed to identify barriers and enabling conditions of the HPV vaccine as perceived by young adults residing in Hanoi, providing insights to improve future health promotion strategies in Vietnam.

Methods

Framed within the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), we conducted a descriptive qualitative study to examine the influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 participants (10 males and 14 females) aged 18–25, in Hanoi, Vietnam.

Results

Participants' main concerns regarding HPV vaccination were: (i) literacy towards HPV infection and vaccination; (ii) financial capacity; (iii) local availability of the vaccine; (iv) flexibility of the vaccination program. Motivating factors included perceived: (i) sexual activity-related risks; (ii) gender-related health risks and biological risks; (iii) fear of death. Moreover, social pressure from the government, family, and friends also influenced young people's intention to vaccinate.

Conclusions

This study enhances our understanding of young adults' acceptance of HPV vaccination in Hanoi, Vietnam. Identifying significant perceptions that affect health decision-making in this age group is crucial to developing prospective intervention programs that address financial barriers, increase accessibility, expand the national vaccination program. Our findings also highlight the need to enhance HPV health literacy among not just women but also men, as well as healthcare providers. Consideration of the implications may help to increase vaccine uptake rates in both genders.
{"title":"HPV vaccine uptake by Young adults in Hanoi, Vietnam: A qualitative investigation","authors":"Nguyen Thi My Hao ,&nbsp;Hoang Vo Ngoc Khanh ,&nbsp;Pranee Liamputtong ,&nbsp;Nguyen Khoi Quan ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Taylor-Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100619","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100619","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized to cause not only cervical cancer but also several HPV-related sexually transmitted diseases in both sexes. Despite the effectiveness of HPV vaccines to prevent HPV-related sexually transmitted diseases, in 2021 only 12 % of Vietnamese females aged 15–29 were recorded as vaccinated, while information on males was underreported. This paper aimed to identify barriers and enabling conditions of the HPV vaccine as perceived by young adults residing in Hanoi, providing insights to improve future health promotion strategies in Vietnam.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Framed within the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), we conducted a descriptive qualitative study to examine the influencing factors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 participants (10 males and 14 females) aged 18–25, in Hanoi, Vietnam.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants' main concerns regarding HPV vaccination were: (i) literacy towards HPV infection and vaccination; (ii) financial capacity; (iii) local availability of the vaccine; (iv) flexibility of the vaccination program. Motivating factors included perceived: (i) sexual activity-related risks; (ii) gender-related health risks and biological risks; (iii) fear of death. Moreover, social pressure from the government, family, and friends also influenced young people's intention to vaccinate.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study enhances our understanding of young adults' acceptance of HPV vaccination in Hanoi, Vietnam. Identifying significant perceptions that affect health decision-making in this age group is crucial to developing prospective intervention programs that address financial barriers, increase accessibility, expand the national vaccination program. Our findings also highlight the need to enhance HPV health literacy among not just women but also men, as well as healthcare providers. Consideration of the implications may help to increase vaccine uptake rates in both genders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143427963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Costs estimation of three models of COVID-19 vaccination in Beijing, China
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100616
Hongzeng Wang , Dan Zhao , Xiaomei Li , Luodan Suo , Li Lu , Zhujiazi Zhang
Since the emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, the Chinese government has used three vaccination models: vaccination clinic, mass vaccination center, and door-to-door service. This study compared these three different models, focusing on costs, and implementation in each vaccination strategy. A cross-sectional study, conducted during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign from January 1 to 20, 2021, utilized a questionnaire to collect data on vaccination sites and conducted a random sample costs analysis of three models. Data on costs, including construction, materials, labor, and operations, were gathered through interviews and field surveys to understand resource utilization and personnel involvement in vaccination activities. Beijing's COVID-19 vaccination campaign involved 580 locations administering 1,829,324 doses. The numbers of vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service were 233, 137, and 210. The total doses administered at vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service numbered 465,721 (25.5 %), 991,444 (54.2 %), and 372,159 (20.3 %), respectively. The median daily doses administered at vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service were 124, 453, and 540, respectively. The daily costs of the vaccination clinic, mass vaccination center, and door-to-door service were $4644.1, $22,746.5, and $4109.6, respectively, and the costs per dose were $12.9, $10.5, and $7.4, respectively. We concluded that there are significant variations in costs and efficiency across the three vaccination models. We must comprehensively consider the available regional resources, the target population for vaccination, the expected vaccination effect, and other factors to choose an appropriate vaccination model.
{"title":"Costs estimation of three models of COVID-19 vaccination in Beijing, China","authors":"Hongzeng Wang ,&nbsp;Dan Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Li ,&nbsp;Luodan Suo ,&nbsp;Li Lu ,&nbsp;Zhujiazi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100616","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100616","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccine in 2021, the Chinese government has used three vaccination models: vaccination clinic, mass vaccination center, and door-to-door service. This study compared these three different models, focusing on costs, and implementation in each vaccination strategy. A cross-sectional study, conducted during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign from January 1 to 20, 2021, utilized a questionnaire to collect data on vaccination sites and conducted a random sample costs analysis of three models. Data on costs, including construction, materials, labor, and operations, were gathered through interviews and field surveys to understand resource utilization and personnel involvement in vaccination activities. Beijing's COVID-19 vaccination campaign involved 580 locations administering 1,829,324 doses. The numbers of vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service were 233, 137, and 210. The total doses administered at vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service numbered 465,721 (25.5 %), 991,444 (54.2 %), and 372,159 (20.3 %), respectively. The median daily doses administered at vaccination clinics, mass vaccination centers, and door-to-door service were 124, 453, and 540, respectively. The daily costs of the vaccination clinic, mass vaccination center, and door-to-door service were $4644.1, $22,746.5, and $4109.6, respectively, and the costs per dose were $12.9, $10.5, and $7.4, respectively. We concluded that there are significant variations in costs and efficiency across the three vaccination models. We must comprehensively consider the available regional resources, the target population for vaccination, the expected vaccination effect, and other factors to choose an appropriate vaccination model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143419466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Genetic diversity and prevalence of group A rotavirus infection in children of Imphal, Manipur, India: A hospital-based surveillance study conducted during December 2015 to March 2019
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100614
Damayanti Yengkhom Devi , Chongtham Shyamsunder Singh , C. Durga Rao , Nima D. Namsa
Rotavirus is the most common cause of acute gastroenteritis in infants and children worldwide. The study is hospital-based surveillance of rotavirus diarrhea in children from Imphal, Manipur, India conducted from December 2015 to March 2019. The positivity rate was found to be high ∼69.25% (358/517) and proportion of diarrhea cases and rotavirus diarrhea was peak in winter months and mostly in children from 6 to 24 months. G3 (43%) was the most widely circulating genotype in Imphal followed by G1 (16%), G2 (8%), G9 (5%), G8 (3%), G10 (1%), and G4 (1%), while G12 (0.26%) was rarely detected. Among P-types, P[6] (22%) accounted for the highest prevalence followed by P[8] (11%) and P[4] (4%), P[11] (4%), P[10] (3%), P-type mixed infection 3%, while 53% were untypeable. In G/P combinations, we detected 22 different rotavirus strains at varying frequencies. Globally distributed G3P[8] and G1P[8] strains were observed in the study. G3P[6] emerged as the most predominant rotavirus strain followed by G3P[8], G1P[6], G1P[8], and G9P[6]. The common rotavirus strains distributed across the region namely G3P[8], G1P[8], G2P[4], G9P[4], G1P[4], G1P[6], and G9P[6] were also observed. Interestingly, our study has observed a high percentage of unusual strains namely G9P[4], G1P[11], G2P[11], G3P[10], G3P[11], G4P[11], G9P[10], G9P[11],G10P[6], and G10P[8]. Of note, the high frequency of non-typeable rotavirus P-types (56%) are suggestive of point mutations that might have accumulated in the primer-binding region of VP4 gene. The findings of the present study revealed the hospital-based prevalence of rotavirus disease and the circulating genotypes during the pre-vaccination period and highlights the need for continuous surveillance of rotavirus infection post-rotavac vaccine introduction in the state of Manipur, India.
{"title":"Genetic diversity and prevalence of group A rotavirus infection in children of Imphal, Manipur, India: A hospital-based surveillance study conducted during December 2015 to March 2019","authors":"Damayanti Yengkhom Devi ,&nbsp;Chongtham Shyamsunder Singh ,&nbsp;C. Durga Rao ,&nbsp;Nima D. Namsa","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100614","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100614","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rotavirus is the most common cause of acute gastroenteritis in infants and children worldwide. The study is hospital-based surveillance of rotavirus diarrhea in children from Imphal, Manipur, India conducted from December 2015 to March 2019. The positivity rate was found to be high ∼69.25% (358/517) and proportion of diarrhea cases and rotavirus diarrhea was peak in winter months and mostly in children from 6 to 24 months. G3 (43%) was the most widely circulating genotype in Imphal followed by G1 (16%), G2 (8%), G9 (5%), G8 (3%), G10 (1%), and G4 (1%), while G12 (0.26%) was rarely detected. Among P-types, P[6] (22%) accounted for the highest prevalence followed by P[8] (11%) and P[4] (4%), P[11] (4%), P[10] (3%), P-type mixed infection 3%, while 53% were untypeable. In G/P combinations, we detected 22 different rotavirus strains at varying frequencies. Globally distributed G3P[8] and G1P[8] strains were observed in the study. G3P[6] emerged as the most predominant rotavirus strain followed by G3P[8], G1P[6], G1P[8], and G9P[6]. The common rotavirus strains distributed across the region namely G3P[8], G1P[8], G2P[4], G9P[4], G1P[4], G1P[6], and G9P[6] were also observed. Interestingly, our study has observed a high percentage of unusual strains namely G9P[4], G1P[11], G2P[11], G3P[10], G3P[11], G4P[11], G9P[10], G9P[11],G10P[6], and G10P[8]. Of note, the high frequency of non-typeable rotavirus P-types (56%) are suggestive of point mutations that might have accumulated in the primer-binding region of VP4 gene. The findings of the present study revealed the hospital-based prevalence of rotavirus disease and the circulating genotypes during the pre-vaccination period and highlights the need for continuous surveillance of rotavirus infection post-rotavac vaccine introduction in the state of Manipur, India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100614"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143403415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preventing vaccine drop-outs: Geographic and system-level barriers to full immunization coverage among children in Uttar Pradesh, India
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100613
Ravi Prakash , Pradeep Kumar , Bidyadhar Dehury , Deep Thacker , Esther Shoemaker , Ramesh Banadakoppa Manjappa , Shajy Isac , John Anthony , Vasanthakumar Namasivayam , James Blanchard , Marissa Becker , Ties Boerma

Objective

Global interventions on routine immunization aim to achieve at least 90 % immunization coverage of all vaccines as per national immunization schedules, aligning with the Immunization Agenda 2030. Despite significant global progress, regions like Uttar Pradesh (UP), India's most populous state, require more efforts to meet this target.

Methods

In 2021, a quantitative survey was conducted with 10,591 mothers/caregivers of children aged 0–15 months and 479 linked community health workers (Accredited Social Health Activists, ASHAs) responsible for connecting these families with vaccine services across 444 rural villages in UP. We developed a coverage cascade to assess the coverage of all basic vaccines (1 dose of each BCG and MR, and 3 doses each of DPT/Penta and Polio), immunization dropouts, and their drivers.

Findings

While 96.4 % of service platforms had the required vaccines available and 94.7 % of children aged 12–15 months had received the first dose of Pentavalent vaccine, only 67.8 % of children received all basic vaccines, with 53.5 % completing these vaccines in the first year of life. More than half (53 %) of dropouts were concentrated in 30 % of ASHA areas. Among these areas, 13 % had no dropouts, and 29 % had more than 60 % of children aged 12–15 months with incomplete immunization. Areas with high dropout rates had higher rates of home deliveries, lower possession of parent-held vaccination records (MCP cards), and poor community-level factors such as incomplete record keeping by ASHAs, less supportive supervision by their supervisors, and relatively lower work motivation compared to areas with no dropouts.

Conclusion

The wide heterogeneity in immunization coverage and dropouts emphasize the need to identify area-specific patterns and reasons for low immunization coverage and to develop interventions to address them. Robust support systems for community health workers and comprehensive record-keeping are pivotal to improve immunization coverage and to reduce the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases.
{"title":"Preventing vaccine drop-outs: Geographic and system-level barriers to full immunization coverage among children in Uttar Pradesh, India","authors":"Ravi Prakash ,&nbsp;Pradeep Kumar ,&nbsp;Bidyadhar Dehury ,&nbsp;Deep Thacker ,&nbsp;Esther Shoemaker ,&nbsp;Ramesh Banadakoppa Manjappa ,&nbsp;Shajy Isac ,&nbsp;John Anthony ,&nbsp;Vasanthakumar Namasivayam ,&nbsp;James Blanchard ,&nbsp;Marissa Becker ,&nbsp;Ties Boerma","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100613","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100613","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Global interventions on routine immunization aim to achieve at least 90 % immunization coverage of all vaccines as per national immunization schedules, aligning with the Immunization Agenda 2030. Despite significant global progress, regions like Uttar Pradesh (UP), India's most populous state, require more efforts to meet this target.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2021, a quantitative survey was conducted with 10,591 mothers/caregivers of children aged 0–15 months and 479 linked community health workers (Accredited Social Health Activists, ASHAs) responsible for connecting these families with vaccine services across 444 rural villages in UP. We developed a coverage cascade to assess the coverage of all basic vaccines (1 dose of each BCG and MR, and 3 doses each of DPT/Penta and Polio), immunization dropouts, and their drivers.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>While 96.4 % of service platforms had the required vaccines available and 94.7 % of children aged 12–15 months had received the first dose of Pentavalent vaccine, only 67.8 % of children received all basic vaccines, with 53.5 % completing these vaccines in the first year of life. More than half (53 %) of dropouts were concentrated in 30 % of ASHA areas. Among these areas, 13 % had no dropouts, and 29 % had more than 60 % of children aged 12–15 months with incomplete immunization. Areas with high dropout rates had higher rates of home deliveries, lower possession of parent-held vaccination records (MCP cards), and poor community-level factors such as incomplete record keeping by ASHAs, less supportive supervision by their supervisors, and relatively lower work motivation compared to areas with no dropouts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The wide heterogeneity in immunization coverage and dropouts emphasize the need to identify area-specific patterns and reasons for low immunization coverage and to develop interventions to address them. Robust support systems for community health workers and comprehensive record-keeping are pivotal to improve immunization coverage and to reduce the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143164738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors influencing immunization record retrieval from immunization information systems among independent community pharmacies: A National Survey
IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100608
Oluchukwu M. Ezeala , Nicholas P. McCormick , Christopher L. Meininger , Hannah Fish , John Beckner , David Ha , Rebecca Snead , Heather Vance , Salisa C. Westrick

Background/objectives

Community pharmacies may not consistently check patients' immunization records from Immunization Information Systems (IIS) before administering vaccines. Therefore, this study aimed to identify key factors associated with vaccine records retrieval from IIS among community pharmacies.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of 9446 members of the United States National Community Pharmacists Association was conducted from September–November 2022. There were 492 responses (response rate 5.2 %) received. The analysis included 202 participants who provided immunization services in 2021, administered vaccines besides COVID-19 or influenza, and completed ≥80 % of the questionnaire. The dependent variable was participants' self-reported frequency of retrieving immunization records from IIS (categorized as high or low IIS users). The independent variables considered were participant/pharmacy characteristics, IIS knowledge and perceptions about innovation characteristics, process, and inner settings, as identified by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Exploratory factor analysis identified ten perception scales, and all had Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of >0.70.

Results

Approximately 65 % of the respondents were high IIS users (“frequently”/“always”) while 35 % were low IIS users (“never”/“rarely”/“occasionally”). A bivariate analyses of the relationship between the dependent and independent variables indicated significant differences in job title, state requirement for documentation in IIS, and eight scales: perceived benefit of IIS in consolidating patient records, optimizing immunization service delivery process, perceived IIS usability, process of engaging staff in IIS implementation, leadership support in encouraging IIS utilization, team values, open communications, and organizational needs fulfillment. A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that process optimization (p = .009) and leadership support (p = .018) were the two significant predictors of being in the high IIS user group when accounting for other variables.

Conclusion

Interventions to encourage independent community pharmacies to retrieve vaccine records from IIS should focus on enhancing the efficiency of the IIS process and leadership support.
{"title":"Factors influencing immunization record retrieval from immunization information systems among independent community pharmacies: A National Survey","authors":"Oluchukwu M. Ezeala ,&nbsp;Nicholas P. McCormick ,&nbsp;Christopher L. Meininger ,&nbsp;Hannah Fish ,&nbsp;John Beckner ,&nbsp;David Ha ,&nbsp;Rebecca Snead ,&nbsp;Heather Vance ,&nbsp;Salisa C. Westrick","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100608","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100608","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><div>Community pharmacies may not consistently check patients' immunization records from Immunization Information Systems (IIS) before administering vaccines. Therefore, this study aimed to identify key factors associated with vaccine records retrieval from IIS among community pharmacies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional survey of 9446 members of the United States National Community Pharmacists Association was conducted from September–November 2022. There were 492 responses (response rate 5.2 %) received. The analysis included 202 participants who provided immunization services in 2021, administered vaccines besides COVID-19 or influenza, and completed ≥80 % of the questionnaire. The dependent variable was participants' self-reported frequency of retrieving immunization records from IIS (categorized as high or low IIS users). The independent variables considered were participant/pharmacy characteristics, IIS knowledge and perceptions about innovation characteristics, process, and inner settings, as identified by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Exploratory factor analysis identified ten perception scales, and all had Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of &gt;0.70.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately 65 % of the respondents were high IIS users (“frequently”/“always”) while 35 % were low IIS users (“never”/“rarely”/“occasionally”). A bivariate analyses of the relationship between the dependent and independent variables indicated significant differences in job title, state requirement for documentation in IIS, and eight scales: perceived benefit of IIS in consolidating patient records, optimizing immunization service delivery process, perceived IIS usability, process of engaging staff in IIS implementation, leadership support in encouraging IIS utilization, team values, open communications, and organizational needs fulfillment. A multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that process optimization (<em>p</em> = .009) and leadership support (<em>p</em> = .018) were the two significant predictors of being in the high IIS user group when accounting for other variables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Interventions to encourage independent community pharmacies to retrieve vaccine records from IIS should focus on enhancing the efficiency of the IIS process and leadership support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143164737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vaccine: X
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1