Use, perceptions, and effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation among older adults in England: a population study, 2014-2024.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03728-x
Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab, Sharon Cox
{"title":"Use, perceptions, and effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation among older adults in England: a population study, 2014-2024.","authors":"Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab, Sharon Cox","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03728-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to characterise patterns of tobacco smoking and vaping among older adults (≥ 65 years) in England, to explore harm perceptions of e-cigarettes among those who smoke, and to estimate the real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes for helping older adults to stop smoking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected as part of a representative monthly cross-sectional household survey in England between April 2014 and April 2024 (n = 197,219). We analysed differences between older (≥ 65 years) and younger/middle-aged adults (18-64 years) in (a) time trends in tobacco smoking and vaping, (b) harm perceptions of e-cigarettes vs. cigarettes (adjusting for gender, socioeconomic position, and vaping status), and (c) the real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (adjusting for gender, socioeconomic position, characteristics of the quit attempt, and use of other evidence-based cessation aids).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tobacco smoking prevalence remained relatively unchanged over time among older adults (at ~ 9%; 9.5% [8.5-10.6%] in April 2014 and 8.7% [7.7-9.8%] in April 2024) but vaping prevalence increased (from 2.1% [1.6-2.7%] to 3.7% [3.0-4.6%], respectively). These trends differed from those observed among younger/middle-aged adults, among whom there was a clear decline in smoking (from 21.8% [21.0-22.7%] to 18.2% [17.3-19.0%]) and a larger increase in vaping (from 5.6% [5.2-6.1%] to 16.2% [15.3-17.0%]). Older adults were consistently less likely than younger/middle-aged adults to use e-cigarettes to support attempts to quit smoking (26.8% [17.2-39.3%] vs. 43.7% [39.6-48.0%] in April 2024). Older smokers reported greater uncertainty about the harms of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 2.48 [2.28-2.69]). E-cigarettes appeared to be effective for helping older adults to stop smoking (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 1.50 [0.96-2.34]); whether effectiveness was lower than for younger/middle-aged adults was inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the past decade, smoking prevalence has remained stable among older adults while decreasing among the rest of the adult population in England. Older adults are more unsure about the relative harms of e-cigarettes and less likely to use them to support attempts to quit smoking, despite evidence that they are effective for smoking cessation in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"500"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03728-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to characterise patterns of tobacco smoking and vaping among older adults (≥ 65 years) in England, to explore harm perceptions of e-cigarettes among those who smoke, and to estimate the real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes for helping older adults to stop smoking.

Methods: Data were collected as part of a representative monthly cross-sectional household survey in England between April 2014 and April 2024 (n = 197,219). We analysed differences between older (≥ 65 years) and younger/middle-aged adults (18-64 years) in (a) time trends in tobacco smoking and vaping, (b) harm perceptions of e-cigarettes vs. cigarettes (adjusting for gender, socioeconomic position, and vaping status), and (c) the real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (adjusting for gender, socioeconomic position, characteristics of the quit attempt, and use of other evidence-based cessation aids).

Results: Tobacco smoking prevalence remained relatively unchanged over time among older adults (at ~ 9%; 9.5% [8.5-10.6%] in April 2014 and 8.7% [7.7-9.8%] in April 2024) but vaping prevalence increased (from 2.1% [1.6-2.7%] to 3.7% [3.0-4.6%], respectively). These trends differed from those observed among younger/middle-aged adults, among whom there was a clear decline in smoking (from 21.8% [21.0-22.7%] to 18.2% [17.3-19.0%]) and a larger increase in vaping (from 5.6% [5.2-6.1%] to 16.2% [15.3-17.0%]). Older adults were consistently less likely than younger/middle-aged adults to use e-cigarettes to support attempts to quit smoking (26.8% [17.2-39.3%] vs. 43.7% [39.6-48.0%] in April 2024). Older smokers reported greater uncertainty about the harms of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes (ORadj = 2.48 [2.28-2.69]). E-cigarettes appeared to be effective for helping older adults to stop smoking (ORadj = 1.50 [0.96-2.34]); whether effectiveness was lower than for younger/middle-aged adults was inconclusive.

Conclusions: Over the past decade, smoking prevalence has remained stable among older adults while decreasing among the rest of the adult population in England. Older adults are more unsure about the relative harms of e-cigarettes and less likely to use them to support attempts to quit smoking, despite evidence that they are effective for smoking cessation in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰老年人对电子烟的使用、认知和戒烟效果:2014-2024 年人口研究。
背景:本研究旨在描述英格兰老年人(≥ 65 岁)吸烟和吸食电子烟的模式,探讨吸烟者对电子烟危害的看法,并估算电子烟在帮助老年人戒烟方面的实际效果:数据收集于 2014 年 4 月至 2024 年 4 月期间在英格兰进行的具有代表性的每月横断面家庭调查(n = 197,219 人)。我们分析了老年人(≥ 65 岁)和年轻/中年成人(18-64 岁)在以下方面的差异:(a)吸烟和吸食电子烟的时间趋势;(b)对电子烟与卷烟危害的认知(根据性别、社会经济地位和吸食电子烟的情况进行调整);(c)电子烟在戒烟方面的实际效果(根据性别、社会经济地位、戒烟尝试的特征和使用其他循证戒烟辅助工具的情况进行调整):随着时间的推移,老年人的吸烟率相对保持不变(约为9%;2014年4月为9.5% [8.5-10.6%],2024年4月为8.7% [7.7-9.8%]),但电子烟的吸烟率有所上升(分别从2.1% [1.6-2.7%]上升到3.7% [3.0-4.6%])。这些趋势与在中青年成年人中观察到的趋势不同,在中青年成年人中,吸烟率明显下降(从21.8%[21.0-22.7%]下降到18.2%[17.3-19.0%]),而吸食电子烟的上升幅度较大(从5.6%[5.2-6.1%]上升到16.2%[15.3-17.0%])。在2024年4月,老年人使用电子烟戒烟的可能性一直低于年轻人/中年人(26.8% [17.2-39.3%] vs. 43.7% [39.6-48.0%])。与卷烟相比,老年吸烟者对电子烟危害的不确定性更高(ORadj = 2.48 [2.28-2.69])。电子烟似乎能有效帮助老年人戒烟(ORadj = 1.50 [0.96-2.34]);但效果是否低于年轻人/中年人尚无定论:结论:在过去十年中,英格兰老年人的吸烟率保持稳定,而其他成年人的吸烟率则有所下降。尽管有证据表明电子烟对老年人戒烟有效,但老年人更不确定电子烟的相对危害,也不太可能使用电子烟来支持戒烟尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and uptake of vaping among people who have quit smoking: a population study in England, 2013-2024. Retrospective epidemiologic and genomic surveillance of arboviruses in 2023 in Brazil reveals high co-circulation of chikungunya and dengue viruses. Systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies on antihypertensive drugs. Diastolic dysfunction and risks of heart failure and death in long-term adult cancer survivors. Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1