Diastolic dysfunction and risks of heart failure and death in long-term adult cancer survivors.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03773-6
Rongjian Yu, Juze Lin, Tingting Fu, Xuhui Huang, Fei Xu, Caizhi Yang, Yuanfeng Fu, Hongwen Fei, Lizhu Lin
{"title":"Diastolic dysfunction and risks of heart failure and death in long-term adult cancer survivors.","authors":"Rongjian Yu, Juze Lin, Tingting Fu, Xuhui Huang, Fei Xu, Caizhi Yang, Yuanfeng Fu, Hongwen Fei, Lizhu Lin","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03773-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer survivors face elevated risks of heart failure (HF) and death, with cardiac dysfunction being a significant concern. Current evaluations often emphasize systolic function while insufficiently addressing diastolic function. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction and assess its prognostic implications in long-term cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with complete echocardiographic assessments and documented cancer histories. Diastolic function was classified by guideline criteria: normal (≤ 1 abnormal parameter), indeterminate (2 abnormal parameters), and dysfunction (≥ 3 abnormal parameters). The primary outcomes were incident HF and all-cause death. Diastolic dysfunction prevalence was compared between cancer survivors and non-cancer participants after propensity score matching. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to assess associated risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5322 participants were included, with 18.4% (N = 979) being cancer survivors. The mean age of cancer survivors at echocardiography was 76.3 (5.10) years, with a median of 12.17 years since diagnosis. There were no significant differences in diastolic dysfunction prevalence (12.26% vs 10.73%, P = 0.29) after matching. Cox regression revealed a graded association between diastolic dysfunction and risks of HF and death. Fully adjusted hazard ratios were 2.59 (95% CI: 1.59-4.20, P < 0.001) for indeterminate diastolic function and 4.41 (95% CI: 2.40-8.12, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in HF; and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.26-2.25, P < 0.001) for indeterminate and 2.21 (95% CI: 1.51-3.22, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in all-cause death. These results were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses and supported by Kaplan-Meier curves. RCS analyses demonstrated dose-response relationships between individual diastolic parameters and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diastolic dysfunction is prevalent among long-term cancer survivors and is stepwise associated with adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the essential need for ongoing monitoring of diastolic function in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"544"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03773-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors face elevated risks of heart failure (HF) and death, with cardiac dysfunction being a significant concern. Current evaluations often emphasize systolic function while insufficiently addressing diastolic function. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction and assess its prognostic implications in long-term cancer survivors.

Methods: We analyzed participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with complete echocardiographic assessments and documented cancer histories. Diastolic function was classified by guideline criteria: normal (≤ 1 abnormal parameter), indeterminate (2 abnormal parameters), and dysfunction (≥ 3 abnormal parameters). The primary outcomes were incident HF and all-cause death. Diastolic dysfunction prevalence was compared between cancer survivors and non-cancer participants after propensity score matching. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to assess associated risks.

Results: A total of 5322 participants were included, with 18.4% (N = 979) being cancer survivors. The mean age of cancer survivors at echocardiography was 76.3 (5.10) years, with a median of 12.17 years since diagnosis. There were no significant differences in diastolic dysfunction prevalence (12.26% vs 10.73%, P = 0.29) after matching. Cox regression revealed a graded association between diastolic dysfunction and risks of HF and death. Fully adjusted hazard ratios were 2.59 (95% CI: 1.59-4.20, P < 0.001) for indeterminate diastolic function and 4.41 (95% CI: 2.40-8.12, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in HF; and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.26-2.25, P < 0.001) for indeterminate and 2.21 (95% CI: 1.51-3.22, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in all-cause death. These results were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses and supported by Kaplan-Meier curves. RCS analyses demonstrated dose-response relationships between individual diastolic parameters and outcomes.

Conclusions: Diastolic dysfunction is prevalent among long-term cancer survivors and is stepwise associated with adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the essential need for ongoing monitoring of diastolic function in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期癌症成年幸存者的舒张功能障碍与心力衰竭和死亡风险。
背景:癌症幸存者面临心力衰竭(HF)和死亡的风险较高,其中心脏功能障碍是一个重要问题。目前的评估通常强调收缩功能,而没有充分考虑舒张功能。本研究旨在调查舒张功能障碍的发生率,并评估其对长期癌症幸存者预后的影响:我们分析了社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)的参与者,这些参与者均接受过完整的超声心动图评估并有癌症病史记录。根据指南标准对舒张功能进行分类:正常(≤1个异常参数)、不确定(2个异常参数)和功能障碍(≥3个异常参数)。主要结果是心房颤动事件和全因死亡。经过倾向得分匹配后,对癌症幸存者和非癌症参与者的舒张功能障碍发生率进行了比较。采用Cox回归、Kaplan-Meier和限制性立方样条曲线(RCS)分析评估相关风险:共纳入 5322 名参与者,其中 18.4% (N = 979)为癌症幸存者。癌症幸存者接受超声心动图检查时的平均年龄为 76.3 (5.10)岁,确诊后的中位年龄为 12.17 岁。匹配后,舒张功能障碍患病率无明显差异(12.26% vs 10.73%,P = 0.29)。Cox 回归显示,舒张功能障碍与心房颤动和死亡风险之间存在分级关系。完全调整后的危险比为 2.59(95% CI:1.59-4.20,P 结论:舒张功能障碍在长期癌症幸存者中普遍存在,并与不良预后逐步相关。这些发现强调了在这一人群中持续监测舒张功能的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Estimation of physiological aging based on routine clinical biomarkers: a prospective cohort study in elderly Chinese and the UK Biobank. Prevalence and uptake of vaping among people who have quit smoking: a population study in England, 2013-2024. Economic costs attributable to modifiable risk factors: an analysis of 24 million urban residents in China. Longitudinal decline in DAT binding in Parkinson's disease: connections with sleep disturbances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1