Pharmacodynamics of 2 dosages of orally administered esomeprazole in client-owned, healthy dogs: A prospective, crossover study.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1111/jvim.17233
Abby Ostronic, Christine Gremillion, Song Zhang, Joerg M Steiner, M Katherine Tolbert, Emily N Gould
{"title":"Pharmacodynamics of 2 dosages of orally administered esomeprazole in client-owned, healthy dogs: A prospective, crossover study.","authors":"Abby Ostronic, Christine Gremillion, Song Zhang, Joerg M Steiner, M Katherine Tolbert, Emily N Gould","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esomeprazole use is increasing in dogs, but the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with q12h dosing necessitate pharmacodynamic evaluation of a reduced dose and frequency of administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of 2 doses of (q24h) esomeprazole in raising intragastric pH in dogs.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Nine healthy, client-owned dogs, >20 kg.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, randomized, double blinded, crossover study. Esomeprazole (0.5 or 1 mg/kg q24h) was orally administered for up to 5 days per treatment arm, and the mean percentage time intragastric pH was ≥3 (MPT3) and ≥4 (MPT4) for 24 hours periods were compared to pretreatment pH using a continuous pH monitoring system. Dogs failing to reach pH goals (MPT3 ≥75%, MPT4 ≥66%) with once daily dosing received esomeprazole 1 mg/kg PO q12h to determine if a higher dose would improve acid suppression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in the MPT3 or MPT4 was identified between treatments for any time point (P > .05). Both doses increased the MPT pH ≥3 and 4 median [range] (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg) on days 1 (MPT3: 76.8% [44-100], 69.2% [28.2-100]; MPT4: 65.6% [16.7-99.3], 54.9% [14.9-93.3]; P = .0009) and 2 (MPT3:77.2% [27.4-100], 75.4% [49.4-89.5]; MPT4: 66.3% [15.5-100], 59.7% [33.8-81.2]; P = .0005) of PPI treatment compared to pretreatment (MPT3: 58.3% [0.02-93.9], 52.6% [6.1-94.7]; MPT4: 25.2% [0-86.8], 32.4% [1.8-89.3]). Six dogs (66%, [0.36, 0.97]) reached pH goals established in humans with q24h dosing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>Both q24h PO esomeprazole doses were effective in raising intragastric pH, despite high intersubject variability, but 33% of dogs required q12h dosing to reach pH goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esomeprazole use is increasing in dogs, but the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with q12h dosing necessitate pharmacodynamic evaluation of a reduced dose and frequency of administration.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 2 doses of (q24h) esomeprazole in raising intragastric pH in dogs.

Animals: Nine healthy, client-owned dogs, >20 kg.

Methods: Prospective, randomized, double blinded, crossover study. Esomeprazole (0.5 or 1 mg/kg q24h) was orally administered for up to 5 days per treatment arm, and the mean percentage time intragastric pH was ≥3 (MPT3) and ≥4 (MPT4) for 24 hours periods were compared to pretreatment pH using a continuous pH monitoring system. Dogs failing to reach pH goals (MPT3 ≥75%, MPT4 ≥66%) with once daily dosing received esomeprazole 1 mg/kg PO q12h to determine if a higher dose would improve acid suppression.

Results: No significant difference in the MPT3 or MPT4 was identified between treatments for any time point (P > .05). Both doses increased the MPT pH ≥3 and 4 median [range] (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg) on days 1 (MPT3: 76.8% [44-100], 69.2% [28.2-100]; MPT4: 65.6% [16.7-99.3], 54.9% [14.9-93.3]; P = .0009) and 2 (MPT3:77.2% [27.4-100], 75.4% [49.4-89.5]; MPT4: 66.3% [15.5-100], 59.7% [33.8-81.2]; P = .0005) of PPI treatment compared to pretreatment (MPT3: 58.3% [0.02-93.9], 52.6% [6.1-94.7]; MPT4: 25.2% [0-86.8], 32.4% [1.8-89.3]). Six dogs (66%, [0.36, 0.97]) reached pH goals established in humans with q24h dosing.

Conclusions and clinical importance: Both q24h PO esomeprazole doses were effective in raising intragastric pH, despite high intersubject variability, but 33% of dogs required q12h dosing to reach pH goals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在客户饲养的健康犬中口服两种剂量埃索美拉唑的药效学:前瞻性交叉研究。
背景:埃索美拉唑在犬中的使用越来越多,但由于每 12 小时给药一次会引起胃肠道不良反应,因此有必要对其进行药效学评估:埃索美拉唑在犬中的使用越来越多,但由于q12h给药会引起胃肠道不良反应,因此有必要对减少给药剂量和频率进行药效学评估:比较两种剂量(q24h)的埃索美拉唑提高犬胃内pH值的疗效:方法:前瞻性、随机、双盲试验:前瞻性、随机、双盲、交叉研究。每个治疗组口服埃索美拉唑(0.5或1毫克/千克,q24小时)最多5天,使用连续pH值监测系统比较24小时胃内pH值≥3(MPT3)和≥4(MPT4)的平均时间百分比与治疗前pH值。每天给药一次但未能达到pH值目标(MPT3 ≥75%,MPT4 ≥66%)的狗接受埃索美拉唑1 mg/kg PO q12h治疗,以确定更高的剂量是否能改善抑酸效果:任何时间点的 MPT3 或 MPT4 均无明显差异(P > .05)。两种剂量在第 1 天(MPT3:76.8% [44-100],69.2% [28.2-100];MPT4:65.6% [16.7-99.3],54.9% [14.9-93.3];P = .0009)和第 2 天(MPT3:77.2% [27.4-100],75.4% [49.4-89.5];MPT4:66.3% [15.5-100],59.7% [33.8-81.2];P = .0005)PPI 治疗与治疗前相比(MPT3:58.3% [0.02-93.9],52.6% [6.1-94.7];MPT4:25.2% [0-86.8],32.4% [1.8-89.3])。六只狗(66%,[0.36, 0.97])通过 q24h 给药达到了人类设定的 pH 值目标:结论和临床意义:尽管受试者之间的差异很大,但两种q24小时给药的埃索美拉唑剂量都能有效提高胃内pH值,但33%的狗需要q12小时给药才能达到pH值目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Veterinary-General Veterinary
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
期刊最新文献
Salivary peptidomic profiling of chronic gingivostomatitis in cats by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and nanoscale liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Effect of phenylbutazone administration on the enteroinsular axis in horses with insulin dysregulation. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for worsening renal function after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in dogs. Genotyping and drug susceptibility profiling of Prototheca sp. strains isolated from cases of protothecosis in dogs. Evaluation of laboratory findings indicating pancreatitis in healthy lean, obese, and diabetic cats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1