Resolution of Historically Discordant Ames Test Negative / Rodent Carcinogenicity Positive N-nitrosamines using a Sensitive, OECD-aligned Design.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/mutage/geae027
Dean N Thomas, John W Wills, Mark Burman, Abbie N Williams, Danielle S G Harte, Ruby A Buckley, Mike W Urquhart, Anne-Sophie Bretonnet, Benjamin Jeffries, Angela T White, James S Harvey, Jonathan R Howe, Anthony M Lynch
{"title":"Resolution of Historically Discordant Ames Test Negative / Rodent Carcinogenicity Positive N-nitrosamines using a Sensitive, OECD-aligned Design.","authors":"Dean N Thomas, John W Wills, Mark Burman, Abbie N Williams, Danielle S G Harte, Ruby A Buckley, Mike W Urquhart, Anne-Sophie Bretonnet, Benjamin Jeffries, Angela T White, James S Harvey, Jonathan R Howe, Anthony M Lynch","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The in vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Test is crucial for evaluating the mutagenicity of pharmaceutical impurities. For N-nitrosamines (NAs) historical data indicated that for certain members of this chemical class the outcomes of the Ames Test did not correlate with their associated rodent carcinogenicity outcomes. This has resulted in negative outcomes in an OECD aligned Ames Test alone (standard or enhanced) no longer being considered sufficient by regulatory authorities to assess potential carcinogenic risk of NAs if present as impurities in drug products. Consequently, extensive follow-up in vivo testing can be required to characterise the potential mutagenicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity of NA impurities (i.e., beyond that defined in the ICH M7 guideline for non-NA impurities). We previously demonstrated that the mutagenicity of alkyl-nitrosamines can be detected by the appropriately designed, OECD aligned Ames Test and identified those conditions that contributed most to assay sensitivity. This OECD aligned Ames Test design was used to assess seven NAs, i.e. (methyl(neopentyl)nitrosamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine, N-nitrosodiisopropylamine, bis(2-methoxyethyl)nitrosoamine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-fluoroaniline, dinitrosoethambutol, (R,R)- and mononitrosocaffeidine) that were reported to be negative in historical Ames Tests but positive in rodent carcinogenicity studies. All seven of the NAs were demonstrated to be mutagenic in the OECD aligned Ames test and therefore these compounds should no longer be considered as discordant (false negatives) with respect to the correlation of the Ames Test and rodent carcinogenicity. These results confirm the sensitivity of the OECD aligned Ames Test for the detection of NA mutagenicity and provides further support of its pivotal placement within the ICH M7 framework for the assessment of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. In addition, we present data for 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine, that indicates it could serve as a suitable positive control to provide further confidence in the sensitivity of the Ames Test for the NA chemical class.</p>","PeriodicalId":18889,"journal":{"name":"Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geae027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The in vitro Bacterial Reverse Mutation (Ames) Test is crucial for evaluating the mutagenicity of pharmaceutical impurities. For N-nitrosamines (NAs) historical data indicated that for certain members of this chemical class the outcomes of the Ames Test did not correlate with their associated rodent carcinogenicity outcomes. This has resulted in negative outcomes in an OECD aligned Ames Test alone (standard or enhanced) no longer being considered sufficient by regulatory authorities to assess potential carcinogenic risk of NAs if present as impurities in drug products. Consequently, extensive follow-up in vivo testing can be required to characterise the potential mutagenicity and genotoxic carcinogenicity of NA impurities (i.e., beyond that defined in the ICH M7 guideline for non-NA impurities). We previously demonstrated that the mutagenicity of alkyl-nitrosamines can be detected by the appropriately designed, OECD aligned Ames Test and identified those conditions that contributed most to assay sensitivity. This OECD aligned Ames Test design was used to assess seven NAs, i.e. (methyl(neopentyl)nitrosamine, N-methyl-N-nitroso-2-propanamine, N-nitrosodiisopropylamine, bis(2-methoxyethyl)nitrosoamine, N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-fluoroaniline, dinitrosoethambutol, (R,R)- and mononitrosocaffeidine) that were reported to be negative in historical Ames Tests but positive in rodent carcinogenicity studies. All seven of the NAs were demonstrated to be mutagenic in the OECD aligned Ames test and therefore these compounds should no longer be considered as discordant (false negatives) with respect to the correlation of the Ames Test and rodent carcinogenicity. These results confirm the sensitivity of the OECD aligned Ames Test for the detection of NA mutagenicity and provides further support of its pivotal placement within the ICH M7 framework for the assessment of mutagenic impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk. In addition, we present data for 1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine, that indicates it could serve as a suitable positive control to provide further confidence in the sensitivity of the Ames Test for the NA chemical class.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用灵敏的、与 OECD 一致的设计,解决历来不一致的艾姆斯试验阴性/啮齿动物致癌性阳性 N-亚硝胺问题。
体外细菌逆向突变(Ames)试验对于评估药物杂质的诱变性至关重要。对于 N-亚硝胺(NAs),历史数据表明,对于该化学类别的某些成员,阿姆斯试验的结果与其相关的啮齿动物致癌性结果并不相关。这导致监管机构不再认为仅通过经合组织(OECD)认可的阿姆斯试验(标准或增强)得出的阴性结果足以评估药物产品中作为杂质存在的 NAs 的潜在致癌风险。因此,需要进行大量的后续体内试验,以确定NA杂质的潜在致突变性和遗传毒性致癌性(即超出ICH M7指南对非NA杂质的规定)。我们之前已经证明,烷基亚硝胺的诱变性可以通过适当设计的、与 OECD 一致的埃姆斯试验进行检测,并确定了对检测灵敏度贡献最大的条件。这种经合组织调整的埃姆斯试验设计用于评估七种亚硝胺,即(甲基(新戊基)亚硝胺、N-甲基-N-亚硝基-2-丙胺、N-亚硝基二异丙基胺、双(2-甲氧基乙基)亚硝基胺、N-亚硝基-N-甲基-4-氟苯胺、二亚硝基乙胺丁醇、(R,R)-和一亚硝基咖啡碱),这些物质在以往的阿姆斯试验中呈阴性,但在啮齿动物致癌性研究中呈阳性。在经合组织(OECD)统一的阿姆斯试验中,所有七种 NA 都被证明具有诱变性,因此在阿姆斯试验与啮齿动物致癌性的相关性方面,这些化合物不应再被视为不一致(假阴性)。这些结果证实了 OECD 阿姆斯试验在检测 NA 诱变性方面的灵敏度,并进一步证明了它在 ICH M7 框架中的重要地位,该框架用于评估药品中的诱变杂质,以限制潜在的致癌风险。此外,我们还提供了 1-环戊基-4-亚硝基哌嗪的数据,表明它可以作为合适的阳性对照,进一步提高阿姆斯检测法对 NA 类化学物质灵敏度的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mutagenesis is an international multi-disciplinary journal designed to bring together research aimed at the identification, characterization and elucidation of the mechanisms of action of physical, chemical and biological agents capable of producing genetic change in living organisms and the study of the consequences of such changes.
期刊最新文献
A pooled analysis of host factors that affect nucleotide excision repair in humans. Piper auritum ethanol extract is a potent antimutagen against food-borne aromatic amines: mechanisms of action and chemical composition. Impact of DNA ligase inhibition on the nick sealing of polβ nucleotide insertion products at the downstream steps of base excision repair pathway. Expression of Concern: Divergent molecular profile of PIK3CA gene in arsenic-associated bladder carcinoma. Dihydroquercetin and biochaga reduce H2O2-induced DNA damage in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of obese women in vitro-a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1