Dupilumab reduces exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema: Phase 3 randomized trial (BOREAS)
Surya P. Bhatt , Klaus F. Rabe , Nicola A. Hanania , Claus F. Vogelmeier , Mona Bafadhel , Stephanie A. Christenson , Alberto Papi , Dave Singh , Elizabeth Laws , Paula Dakin , Jennifer Maloney , Xin Lu , Deborah Bauer , Ashish Bansal , Lacey B. Robinson , Raolat M. Abdulai
{"title":"Dupilumab reduces exacerbations and improves lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema: Phase 3 randomized trial (BOREAS)","authors":"Surya P. Bhatt , Klaus F. Rabe , Nicola A. Hanania , Claus F. Vogelmeier , Mona Bafadhel , Stephanie A. Christenson , Alberto Papi , Dave Singh , Elizabeth Laws , Paula Dakin , Jennifer Maloney , Xin Lu , Deborah Bauer , Ashish Bansal , Lacey B. Robinson , Raolat M. Abdulai","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation in the phase 3 BOREAS trial.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess clinical outcomes in patients from BOREAS by emphysema status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation (screening blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL) on maximal inhaled therapy were randomized to add-on dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. We assessed the annualized moderate/severe COPD exacerbation rates over 52 weeks and change from baseline to Week 12 in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) in patients with and without investigator-reported emphysema.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Investigator-reported emphysema was present in 306/939 patients (32.6 %) at baseline. Dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates vs placebo by 29 % (relative risk [RR] 0.71 [95 % CI 0.53–0.95]) and 31 % (RR 0.69 [95 % CI 0.53–0.89]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. Prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> least squares mean difference from baseline to Week 12 for dupilumab vs placebo was 0.07 L ([95 % CI 0.002–0.14]) and 0.09 L ([95 % CI 0.04–0.14]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. No treatment by emphysema interaction effect was observed for the annualized rate of exacerbations (<em>P</em> value for interaction = 0.8296) or change in prebronchodilator FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>P</em> value for interaction = 0.6438).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab efficacy was similar in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation, with or without investigator-reported emphysema.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107846"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, reduced exacerbations and improved lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation in the phase 3 BOREAS trial.
Objective
To assess clinical outcomes in patients from BOREAS by emphysema status.
Methods
Patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation (screening blood eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL) on maximal inhaled therapy were randomized to add-on dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks for 52 weeks. We assessed the annualized moderate/severe COPD exacerbation rates over 52 weeks and change from baseline to Week 12 in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in patients with and without investigator-reported emphysema.
Results
Investigator-reported emphysema was present in 306/939 patients (32.6 %) at baseline. Dupilumab reduced exacerbation rates vs placebo by 29 % (relative risk [RR] 0.71 [95 % CI 0.53–0.95]) and 31 % (RR 0.69 [95 % CI 0.53–0.89]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. Prebronchodilator FEV1 least squares mean difference from baseline to Week 12 for dupilumab vs placebo was 0.07 L ([95 % CI 0.002–0.14]) and 0.09 L ([95 % CI 0.04–0.14]) in patients with and without emphysema, respectively. No treatment by emphysema interaction effect was observed for the annualized rate of exacerbations (P value for interaction = 0.8296) or change in prebronchodilator FEV1 (P value for interaction = 0.6438).
Conclusion
Dupilumab efficacy was similar in patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation, with or without investigator-reported emphysema.
研究背景杜匹鲁单抗是一种阻断白细胞介素-4和白细胞介素-13共同受体成分的全人源单克隆抗体,在BOREAS三期试验中,杜匹鲁单抗减少了慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和2型炎症患者的病情恶化并改善了肺功能:根据肺气肿状态评估 BOREAS 患者的临床疗效:接受最大吸入治疗的慢性阻塞性肺病和2型炎症患者(筛查血嗜酸性粒细胞≥300 cells/μL)随机接受每2周一次的dupilumab 300 mg或安慰剂治疗,为期52周。我们评估了52周内中度/重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重率的年化情况,以及有和没有研究者报告的肺气肿患者支气管扩张前1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)从基线到第12周的变化情况:基线时有306/939名患者(32.6%)存在研究者报告的肺气肿。在有肺气肿和无肺气肿的患者中,杜匹鲁单抗与安慰剂相比分别降低了29%(相对风险[RR] 0.71 [95% CI 0.53-0.95])和31%(RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.53-0.89])的恶化率。在有肺气肿和无肺气肿的患者中,从基线到第12周,dupilumab与安慰剂的支气管扩张前FEV1最小二乘法平均差分别为0.07升([95% CI 0.002-0.14])和0.09升([95% CI 0.04-0.14])。在年化恶化率(交互作用的P值=0.8296)或支气管扩张剂前FEV1的变化(交互作用的P值=0.6438)方面,未观察到肺气肿对治疗的交互作用:结论:杜匹单抗对慢性阻塞性肺病和2型炎症患者的疗效相似,无论是否有研究者报告的肺气肿。
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.