Qualitatively Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002088
Elijah Moothedan, Vama Jhumkhawala, Sara Burgoa, Lisa Martinez, Lea Sacca
{"title":"Qualitatively Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Sexually Transmitted Diseases.","authors":"Elijah Moothedan, Vama Jhumkhawala, Sara Burgoa, Lisa Martinez, Lea Sacca","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ChatGPT, a large language model artificial intelligence platform that uses natural language processing, has seen its implementation across a number of sectors, notably in healthcare. However, there remains limited understanding regarding the efficacy of ChatGPT in addressing commonly asked questions on public health subjects. This study aimed to investigate whether ChatGPT could appropriately answer frequently asked questions related to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten frequently asked questions on STDs were gathered from 25 different government agency websites. The questions were inputted into ChatGPT and subsequent responses were analyzed for accuracy, clarity, and appropriateness using an evidence-based approach on a 4-point grading scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the responses provided by ChatGPT, four were determined to be excellent requiring no clarification and six requiring minimal clarification. No responses were graded as unsatisfactory. Additionally, the responses appropriately emphasized consulting a healthcare specialist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the majority of responses required minimal clarification, ChatGPT has the potential to be an effective supplementary tool for patient education. Additional research is necessary to explore possible public health strategies that incorporate artificial intelligence to address concerns related to STDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT, a large language model artificial intelligence platform that uses natural language processing, has seen its implementation across a number of sectors, notably in healthcare. However, there remains limited understanding regarding the efficacy of ChatGPT in addressing commonly asked questions on public health subjects. This study aimed to investigate whether ChatGPT could appropriately answer frequently asked questions related to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

Methods: Ten frequently asked questions on STDs were gathered from 25 different government agency websites. The questions were inputted into ChatGPT and subsequent responses were analyzed for accuracy, clarity, and appropriateness using an evidence-based approach on a 4-point grading scale.

Results: Of the responses provided by ChatGPT, four were determined to be excellent requiring no clarification and six requiring minimal clarification. No responses were graded as unsatisfactory. Additionally, the responses appropriately emphasized consulting a healthcare specialist.

Conclusion: While the majority of responses required minimal clarification, ChatGPT has the potential to be an effective supplementary tool for patient education. Additional research is necessary to explore possible public health strategies that incorporate artificial intelligence to address concerns related to STDs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定性评估 ChatGPT 对性传播疾病常见问题的答复。
背景介绍ChatGPT 是一个使用自然语言处理的大型语言模型人工智能平台,已在多个领域得到应用,尤其是在医疗保健领域。然而,人们对 ChatGPT 在解决有关公共卫生主题的常见问题方面的功效了解仍然有限。本研究旨在调查 ChatGPT 是否能适当回答与性传播疾病(STDs)相关的常见问题:方法:从 25 个不同的政府机构网站上收集了 10 个有关性传播疾病的常见问题。这些问题被输入到 ChatGPT 中,随后采用循证方法对回答的准确性、清晰度和适当性进行了分析,并进行了 4 级评分:在 ChatGPT 提供的回复中,有 4 个被确定为无需说明的优秀回复,6 个被确定为只需少量说明的回复。没有答复被评为不满意。此外,这些回复都恰当地强调了咨询医疗保健专家:虽然大多数回复只需要极少的说明,但 ChatGPT 有可能成为患者教育的有效补充工具。有必要开展更多的研究,探索结合人工智能的公共卫生策略,以解决与性传播疾病相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Willingness of Joining Online Support Groups Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV in Shandong Province of China: A Mixed Methods Study. Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Opt-Out Screening of Justice-Involved Women During Intake at the Los Angeles County Jail: The Pivotal Role of Correctional Health Systems. Retrospective Cohort Study of Financial Incentives for Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment in an Outreach Population in Edmonton, Canada, 2018-2019. Multilevel Drivers of Congenital Syphilis, Oregon, 2013 to 2021. Clinical Studies Are Needed to Determine the Efficacy of Ceftriaxone and Other Interventions in Addressing Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1