How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241282702
G Gálvez, M L Jimenez, R Manzanera, A Ávalos, M De Castro, I Moral, A Iruela
{"title":"How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.","authors":"G Gálvez, M L Jimenez, R Manzanera, A Ávalos, M De Castro, I Moral, A Iruela","doi":"10.1177/23743735241282702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study explores how Primary Health Care Team managers in Catalonia assess the gold standard criteria for excellence in Primary Health Care and whether there are differences in evaluations between the best and worst-rated centers by patients in a patient experience survey included in the Catalan Satisfaction Survey Plan (PLAENSA). The researchers used mixed methods to analyze 12 interviews done to Primary Care Team (PCT) managers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed, yielding three themes and 12 subthemes. A Likert-type questionnaire was also used to compare results. Scores were observed between 4.8 and 3.5 regarding a constant relationship with the patient (longitudinality), and patient's experience, respectively. All managers highlight accessibility, nursing management, and administrative support as essential to patient experience. No significant differences exist in PCT's scores or gold standard element application. Disposing of good accessibility, crucial in Primary Health Care management, an administrative team, and efficiently prepared and motivated professionals, are key elements to a patient's experience in Primary Health Care. Contrary to other studies, interviewees described better accessibility in rural centers, which is likely why they are better valued by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241282702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241282702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores how Primary Health Care Team managers in Catalonia assess the gold standard criteria for excellence in Primary Health Care and whether there are differences in evaluations between the best and worst-rated centers by patients in a patient experience survey included in the Catalan Satisfaction Survey Plan (PLAENSA). The researchers used mixed methods to analyze 12 interviews done to Primary Care Team (PCT) managers. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed, yielding three themes and 12 subthemes. A Likert-type questionnaire was also used to compare results. Scores were observed between 4.8 and 3.5 regarding a constant relationship with the patient (longitudinality), and patient's experience, respectively. All managers highlight accessibility, nursing management, and administrative support as essential to patient experience. No significant differences exist in PCT's scores or gold standard element application. Disposing of good accessibility, crucial in Primary Health Care management, an administrative team, and efficiently prepared and motivated professionals, are key elements to a patient's experience in Primary Health Care. Contrary to other studies, interviewees described better accessibility in rural centers, which is likely why they are better valued by patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者和管理者如何重视初级医疗保健中的黄金标准要素。
该研究探讨了加泰罗尼亚地区的初级医疗团队管理人员如何评估初级医疗卓越性的黄金标准,以及在加泰罗尼亚满意度调查计划(PLAENSA)中的患者体验调查中,患者对最佳和最差中心的评价是否存在差异。研究人员采用混合方法分析了对初级医疗团队(PCT)管理人员进行的 12 次访谈。对访谈内容进行了转录和分析,得出了 3 个主题和 12 个次主题。此外,还使用了李克特(Likert)类型的问卷来比较结果。在与患者的持续关系(纵向关系)和患者体验方面,得分分别在 4.8 和 3.5 之间。所有管理人员都强调,无障碍环境、护理管理和行政支持对患者体验至关重要。PCT 的得分和黄金标准要素的应用没有明显差异。在初级医疗保健管理中,良好的可及性、行政团队、准备充分且积极主动的专业人员是患者在初级医疗保健中获得体验的关键因素。与其他研究相反,受访者认为乡镇中心的可及性更好,这可能也是乡镇中心更受患者青睐的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It was not normal, and I had to find a doctor and tell him." Kenyan Women's Response to Cervical Cancer Symptoms. Factors Associated With Psychiatry Consultation for Musculoskeletal Trauma Patients. Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1? An Adaptive Pacing Intervention for Adults Living With Long COVID: A Narrative Study of Patient Experiences of Using the PaceMe app. Behind the Scenes of Isotretinoin: My Journey and Recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1