Niels Van Oost, Annelies Van Raemdonck, Birgitte Schoenmakers
{"title":"Piloting the Impact of an e-Learning on Knowledge About HIV Prevention and Prophylaxis Among General Practitioners in Belgium.","authors":"Niels Van Oost, Annelies Van Raemdonck, Birgitte Schoenmakers","doi":"10.1177/23821205241286293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has set a goal to eliminate AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 and the World Health Organization emphasized pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a crucial element. Despite the lack of a specific role for general practitioners (GPs) in PrEP care, GPs could play a crucial role in the follow-up but this is still uncommon. Above, GPs estimate their knowledge about PrEP as low.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to understand the knowledge of GPs regarding PrEP care. Through online e-learning, we aimed to enhance our knowledge of PrEP care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firstly, we assessed general knowledge about the PrEP of GPs. Secondly, we investigated the impact of e-learning on knowledge of PrEP care among GPs. We developed a multiple-choice questionnaire to evaluate self-assessed knowledge and knowledge about PrEP. One group of participants completed an e-learning module and took a pre- and post-test to assess changes in knowledge. Another group completed the questionnaire without e-learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants completed the survey. Finally, 18 participants successfully completed the e-learning module. Nineteen percent (<i>n</i> = 14) of all GPs considered their general knowledge of PrEP to be \"good,\" while 68% (<i>n</i> = 49) of the GPs felt confident in identifying patients at risk, rating their ability as \"good.\" Participants achieved an average score of 4.7 (test group) and 4.6 (e-learning group) out of 10 on the knowledge test. After completion of the e-learning, the overall average score of the e-learning group significantly increased by 33% (<i>p</i>-value < .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GP generally scored low on knowledge covering different aspects of PrEP. However, after completing an e-learning module, there was a significant increase in the average test scores. These findings highlight the potential efficacy of targeted educational interventions in enhancing the understanding of PrEP among GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241286293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11526260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241286293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) has set a goal to eliminate AIDS as a public health threat by 2030 and the World Health Organization emphasized pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as a crucial element. Despite the lack of a specific role for general practitioners (GPs) in PrEP care, GPs could play a crucial role in the follow-up but this is still uncommon. Above, GPs estimate their knowledge about PrEP as low.
Objectives: This study seeks to understand the knowledge of GPs regarding PrEP care. Through online e-learning, we aimed to enhance our knowledge of PrEP care.
Methods: Firstly, we assessed general knowledge about the PrEP of GPs. Secondly, we investigated the impact of e-learning on knowledge of PrEP care among GPs. We developed a multiple-choice questionnaire to evaluate self-assessed knowledge and knowledge about PrEP. One group of participants completed an e-learning module and took a pre- and post-test to assess changes in knowledge. Another group completed the questionnaire without e-learning.
Results: Seventy-two participants completed the survey. Finally, 18 participants successfully completed the e-learning module. Nineteen percent (n = 14) of all GPs considered their general knowledge of PrEP to be "good," while 68% (n = 49) of the GPs felt confident in identifying patients at risk, rating their ability as "good." Participants achieved an average score of 4.7 (test group) and 4.6 (e-learning group) out of 10 on the knowledge test. After completion of the e-learning, the overall average score of the e-learning group significantly increased by 33% (p-value < .03).
Conclusions: GP generally scored low on knowledge covering different aspects of PrEP. However, after completing an e-learning module, there was a significant increase in the average test scores. These findings highlight the potential efficacy of targeted educational interventions in enhancing the understanding of PrEP among GPs.