What barriers do paediatric nurses encounter when attempting to wean paediatric patients off humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy? A qualitative study.

Tanya Stewart, Lauren Elizabeth Lines
{"title":"What barriers do paediatric nurses encounter when attempting to wean paediatric patients off humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy? A qualitative study.","authors":"Tanya Stewart, Lauren Elizabeth Lines","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2024.10.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to explore nurse perceptions of barriers and facilitators to weaning humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) in Australian paediatric settings.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive two phased study was conducted across Australia. Purposeful sampling and snowballing technique were used to recruit nurses with the study advertised widely on social media nursing groups. Phase One data collection was via a survey with open and closed ended questions, and Phase Two via semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (Phase One) and thematic analysis (Phase One and Two) to identify themes and patterns in the narrative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase one: 36(56.25 %) participants identified their workplace had clear guidelines, 57(89.06 %) received education on HHFNC and 34(57.63 %) experienced barriers when weaning. Three themes and nine subthemes were identified i) variable clinical process for weaning HHFNC, ii) knowledge and skills and iii) clinical observation and assessment of the child. Phase two: four themes and nine subthemes were identified, i) 'There doesn't seem to be any pattern': no evidence to guide practice, ii) Nursing and medical led weaning, iii) Knowledge and skills and iv) Family centred approaches to weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current research on HHFNC does not consider best practice for weaning. This study identified barriers as inconsistency in weaning practice and availability of guidelines and facilitators were a robust education program and confidence in weaning. Multidisciplinary team need to collaborate to determine standardised weaning practice.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Further research is essential to determine best practice weaning methods and inform national/international guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.10.030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurse perceptions of barriers and facilitators to weaning humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) in Australian paediatric settings.

Design and methods: A qualitative descriptive two phased study was conducted across Australia. Purposeful sampling and snowballing technique were used to recruit nurses with the study advertised widely on social media nursing groups. Phase One data collection was via a survey with open and closed ended questions, and Phase Two via semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics (Phase One) and thematic analysis (Phase One and Two) to identify themes and patterns in the narrative.

Results: Phase one: 36(56.25 %) participants identified their workplace had clear guidelines, 57(89.06 %) received education on HHFNC and 34(57.63 %) experienced barriers when weaning. Three themes and nine subthemes were identified i) variable clinical process for weaning HHFNC, ii) knowledge and skills and iii) clinical observation and assessment of the child. Phase two: four themes and nine subthemes were identified, i) 'There doesn't seem to be any pattern': no evidence to guide practice, ii) Nursing and medical led weaning, iii) Knowledge and skills and iv) Family centred approaches to weaning.

Conclusions: Current research on HHFNC does not consider best practice for weaning. This study identified barriers as inconsistency in weaning practice and availability of guidelines and facilitators were a robust education program and confidence in weaning. Multidisciplinary team need to collaborate to determine standardised weaning practice.

Practice implications: Further research is essential to determine best practice weaning methods and inform national/international guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科护士在尝试让儿科患者脱离加湿高流量鼻插管氧气疗法时遇到了哪些障碍?一项定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在探讨护士对澳大利亚儿科环境中断开加湿高流量鼻插管(HHFNC)的障碍和促进因素的看法:在澳大利亚各地分两个阶段进行了定性描述性研究。采用有目的的抽样和滚雪球技术招募护士,并在社交媒体护理小组上广泛宣传该研究。第一阶段通过包含开放式和封闭式问题的调查收集数据,第二阶段通过半结构化访谈收集数据。数据分析采用描述性统计(第一阶段)和主题分析(第一和第二阶段),以确定叙述中的主题和模式:第一阶段36(56.25%)名参与者认为其工作场所有明确的指导方针,57(89.06%)名参与者接受了有关 HHFNC 的教育,34(57.63%)名参与者在断奶时遇到了障碍。确定了三个主题和九个次主题:i) HHFNC 断奶的可变临床过程;ii) 知识和技能;iii) 对儿童的临床观察和评估。第二阶段:确定了四个主题和九个次主题:i) "似乎没有任何模式":没有证据指导实践;ii) 护理和医疗主导断奶;iii) 知识和技能;iv) 以家庭为中心的断奶方法:目前有关 HHFNC 的研究并未考虑断奶的最佳实践。这项研究发现,断奶实践中存在的障碍是指导原则的不一致,而促进断奶的因素则是强有力的教育计划和对断奶的信心。多学科团队需要合作确定标准化的断奶方法:进一步的研究对于确定最佳断奶方法和国家/国际指南至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Identifying missed care in pediatric nursing: A scoping review The development of sudden infant death syndrome awareness scale-mother form and examination of its psychometric properties Effects of hospital treatment for congenital heart defects on mother-infant bonding, maternal stress, and parenting Psychosocial factors correlating self-care management among Jordanian adolescents with type 1 diabetes The social inclusion of care leavers during their transitioning to independent life from aftercare services – A mixed method, retrospective document analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1