Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the temporomandibular joint scale: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1007/s10006-024-01300-8
Mariana Cervaens, Jéssica Pereira, André Magalhães, Mário Esteves, Rui Vilarinho, Verónica Abreu, Luísa Amaral
{"title":"Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the temporomandibular joint scale: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mariana Cervaens, Jéssica Pereira, André Magalhães, Mário Esteves, Rui Vilarinho, Verónica Abreu, Luísa Amaral","doi":"10.1007/s10006-024-01300-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) scale assesses the severity of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), yet a European Portuguese translation is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To translate, cross-culturally adapt and to examine the psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) of the TMJ scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out according to international recommendations, including initial translation, evaluation of this translation and cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, and back translation. The final Portuguese version was used to examine the reliability and validity, and participants with TMD were recruited from a Portuguese outpatient clinic. Reliability measures included internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The Spearman correlation comparing the TMJ scale with the Fonseca and Helkimo indexes was used to assess the construct validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 participants (23 ± 2 years; 61,9% female) were included. Similar internal consistency was observed between the two moments of application (0.921 and 0.918), and test-retest reliability was excellent, with an ICC2,1 = 0.998 (95%CI: 0.988-0.999). Robust positive correlations (rho 0.554-0.611, p < 0.001) were found between the TMJ scale and Fonseca and Helkimo indexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The European Portuguese version of TMJ scale is now available to improve the assessment of severity of TMD in routine clinical practice. This version is also reliable and valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":47251,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-024-01300-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) scale assesses the severity of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), yet a European Portuguese translation is lacking.

Objectives: To translate, cross-culturally adapt and to examine the psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) of the TMJ scale.

Methods: Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out according to international recommendations, including initial translation, evaluation of this translation and cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, and back translation. The final Portuguese version was used to examine the reliability and validity, and participants with TMD were recruited from a Portuguese outpatient clinic. Reliability measures included internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The Spearman correlation comparing the TMJ scale with the Fonseca and Helkimo indexes was used to assess the construct validity.

Results: A total of 63 participants (23 ± 2 years; 61,9% female) were included. Similar internal consistency was observed between the two moments of application (0.921 and 0.918), and test-retest reliability was excellent, with an ICC2,1 = 0.998 (95%CI: 0.988-0.999). Robust positive correlations (rho 0.554-0.611, p < 0.001) were found between the TMJ scale and Fonseca and Helkimo indexes.

Conclusion: The European Portuguese version of TMJ scale is now available to improve the assessment of severity of TMD in routine clinical practice. This version is also reliable and valid.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颞下颌关节量表的葡萄牙语翻译、文化适应性和心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
背景:颞下颌关节量表(TMJ)可评估颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)的严重程度,但目前尚无欧洲葡萄牙语译本:翻译颞下颌关节量表,对其进行跨文化调整,并检验其心理测量特性(结构效度和信度):方法:根据国际建议进行翻译和文化调整,包括初始翻译、专家小组对翻译和文化调整的评估以及回译。最终的葡萄牙语版本用于检验信度和效度,TMD 患者是从葡萄牙一家门诊诊所招募的。信度测量包括内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)和测试-再测信度(类内相关系数(ICC2,1))。颞下颌关节量表与 Fonseca 和 Helkimo 指数之间的斯皮尔曼相关性用于评估构建有效性:共纳入 63 名参与者(23 ± 2 岁;61.9% 为女性)。在两个应用时刻之间观察到了相似的内部一致性(0.921 和 0.918),测试-再测可靠性极佳,ICC2,1 = 0.998(95%CI:0.988-0.999)。测试重测可靠性极佳,ICC2,1 = 0.998(95%CI:0.988-0.999):颞下颌关节量表的欧洲葡萄牙语版本现已可用,可改善常规临床实践中对 TMD 严重程度的评估。该版本同样可靠有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-Heidelberg DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery founded as Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie is a peer-reviewed online journal. It is designed for clinicians as well as researchers.The quarterly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery and interdisciplinary aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. The journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery as well as supporting specialties. Practice-oriented articles help improve the methods used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is fully covered through a range of invited review articles, clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, and case reports. Specific topics are: aesthetic facial surgery, clinical pathology, computer-assisted surgery, congenital and craniofacial deformities, dentoalveolar surgery, head and neck oncology, implant dentistry, oral medicine, orthognathic surgery, reconstructive surgery, skull base surgery, TMJ and trauma.Time-limited reviewing and electronic processing allow to publish articles as fast as possible. Accepted articles are rapidly accessible online.Clinical studies submitted for publication have to include a declaration that they have been approved by an ethical committee according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki 1964 (last amendment during the 52nd World Medical Association General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000). Experimental animal studies have to be carried out according to the principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication No 86-23, revised 1985).
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Mapping trends in preemptive analgesia related to oral surgery with the use of Ibuprofen: a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis of bibliometric parameters. Correction to: Acute orbital compartment syndrome due to traumatic hemorrhage: 4-year case series and relevant literature review with emphasis on its management. Influence of clinical expertise and practical experience on transfer accuracy in guided dental implant placement - an in vitro study. Clinical results of two different three-dimensional plate types for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective analysis. Clinicopathologic and imaging features of odontogenic myxomas: a multi-institutional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1