Closed-Loop Systems and Real-Time Neurofeedback in Mindfulness Meditation Research.

Joseph Cc Chen, David A Ziegler
{"title":"Closed-Loop Systems and Real-Time Neurofeedback in Mindfulness Meditation Research.","authors":"Joseph Cc Chen, David A Ziegler","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mindfulness meditation has numerous purported benefits to psychological wellbeing, however, problems such as adherence to mindfulness tasks, quality of mindfulness sessions, or dosage of mindfulness interventions may hinder individuals from accessing the purported benefits of mindfulness. Methodologies including closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback may provide tools to help bolster success in mindfulness task performance, titrate the exposure to mindfulness interventions, or improve engagement with mindfulness sessions. This review explores the use of closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback to influence, augment, or promote mindfulness interventions. Various closed-loop neurofeedback signals from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) have been used to provide subjective correlates to mindfulness states including: fMRI region-of-interest based signals (e.g., posterior cingulate cortex), fMRI network-based signals (e.g., default mode network, central executive network, salience network), and EEG spectral-based signals (e.g., alpha, theta, and gamma bands). Past research has focused on how successful interventions has aligned with the subjective mindfulness meditation experience. Future research may pivot towards using appropriate control conditions (e.g., mindfulness-only or sham-neurofeedback) to quantify the effects of closed-loop systems and neurofeedback-guided mindfulness meditation in improving cognition and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.10.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mindfulness meditation has numerous purported benefits to psychological wellbeing, however, problems such as adherence to mindfulness tasks, quality of mindfulness sessions, or dosage of mindfulness interventions may hinder individuals from accessing the purported benefits of mindfulness. Methodologies including closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback may provide tools to help bolster success in mindfulness task performance, titrate the exposure to mindfulness interventions, or improve engagement with mindfulness sessions. This review explores the use of closed-loop systems and real-time neurofeedback to influence, augment, or promote mindfulness interventions. Various closed-loop neurofeedback signals from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) have been used to provide subjective correlates to mindfulness states including: fMRI region-of-interest based signals (e.g., posterior cingulate cortex), fMRI network-based signals (e.g., default mode network, central executive network, salience network), and EEG spectral-based signals (e.g., alpha, theta, and gamma bands). Past research has focused on how successful interventions has aligned with the subjective mindfulness meditation experience. Future research may pivot towards using appropriate control conditions (e.g., mindfulness-only or sham-neurofeedback) to quantify the effects of closed-loop systems and neurofeedback-guided mindfulness meditation in improving cognition and wellbeing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正念冥想研究中的闭环系统和实时神经反馈。
正念冥想据称对心理健康有诸多益处,然而,正念任务的坚持性、正念课程的质量或正念干预的剂量等问题可能会阻碍人们获得正念所带来的益处。包括闭环系统和实时神经反馈在内的方法可以提供一些工具,帮助提高正念任务的成功率、调整正念干预的剂量或提高正念课程的参与度。本综述探讨了如何利用闭环系统和实时神经反馈来影响、增强或促进正念干预。来自功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和脑电图(EEG)的各种闭环神经反馈信号已被用于提供正念状态的主观相关性,包括:基于兴趣区域的fMRI信号(如后扣带回皮层)、基于fMRI网络的信号(如默认模式网络、中央执行网络、显著性网络)和基于频谱的EEG信号(如α、θ和γ波段)。过去的研究侧重于成功的干预措施如何与主观正念冥想体验相一致。未来的研究可能会转向使用适当的对照条件(例如,仅正念或假神经反馈)来量化闭环系统和神经反馈引导的正念冥想在改善认知和健康方面的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity. Aperiodic (1/f) neural activity robustly tracks symptom severity changes in treatment-resistant depression. Increased Amygdala Activation during Symptom Provocation Predicts Response to Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Exposure Therapy in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Decoding mindfulness with multivariate predictive models. The reward positivity as a predictor of first lifetime onsets of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in high-risk adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1