Identifying Gaps in the Protection of Mediterranean Seagrass Habitats Using Network-Based Prioritisation

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Diversity and Distributions Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1111/ddi.13922
Damiano Baldan, Yohann Chauvier-Mendes, Fabrizio Gianni, Gianpiero Cossarini, Vinko Bandelj
{"title":"Identifying Gaps in the Protection of Mediterranean Seagrass Habitats Using Network-Based Prioritisation","authors":"Damiano Baldan,&nbsp;Yohann Chauvier-Mendes,&nbsp;Fabrizio Gianni,&nbsp;Gianpiero Cossarini,&nbsp;Vinko Bandelj","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Seagrass meadows represent a key marine ecosystem owing to the significant biodiversity they host. Protection actions are often implemented without considering connectivity between habitats. In this article, we project and prioritise Mediterranean seagrass habitats (<i>Posidonia oceanica</i> and <i>Cymodocea nodosa</i>) based on their potential as sources/retention and stepping stones for dispersal propagules of the associated biotic communities. We use this information to identify gaps in the protection of highly ranked habitats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Mediterranean Sea.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We related seagrass observations with marine environmental predictors to run species distribution models and infer the distribution of Mediterranean seagrasses. We then used a network-based approach (CONEFOR) to rank patches of seagrass suitable areas based on their contribution to the seascape in terms of patch area, potential as source/retention of propagules and stepping stone. Finally, by overlaying our ranking with the spatial distribution of marine protected areas (MPAs), we identified potential gaps in the protection of important seagrass habitats across the Mediterranean and its basins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most of the identified patches of seagrass suitable areas are not included in MPAs, only reaching a maximum protection coverage of ~50% in the Northwestern Mediterranean. Relatively few patches contribute disproportionately to connectivity, but top-ranked habitat patches are not included within the existing MPAs network, both at the Mediterranean scale and for most basins. The largest gaps for the source/sink role are in the Aegean and Ionian Sea, and largest gaps for the stepping stone role are in the Adriatic, Ionian and Tyrrhenian Sea.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results suggest that the current MPAs network fails to protect highly relevant patches of seagrass suitable areas in most of the Mediterranean basins. However, this gap could be filled by a few well-placed MPAs. Overall, we provide novel insights for the identification of key habitats and planning novel coastal MPAs in the region.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"30 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13922","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Seagrass meadows represent a key marine ecosystem owing to the significant biodiversity they host. Protection actions are often implemented without considering connectivity between habitats. In this article, we project and prioritise Mediterranean seagrass habitats (Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa) based on their potential as sources/retention and stepping stones for dispersal propagules of the associated biotic communities. We use this information to identify gaps in the protection of highly ranked habitats.

Location

Mediterranean Sea.

Methods

We related seagrass observations with marine environmental predictors to run species distribution models and infer the distribution of Mediterranean seagrasses. We then used a network-based approach (CONEFOR) to rank patches of seagrass suitable areas based on their contribution to the seascape in terms of patch area, potential as source/retention of propagules and stepping stone. Finally, by overlaying our ranking with the spatial distribution of marine protected areas (MPAs), we identified potential gaps in the protection of important seagrass habitats across the Mediterranean and its basins.

Results

Most of the identified patches of seagrass suitable areas are not included in MPAs, only reaching a maximum protection coverage of ~50% in the Northwestern Mediterranean. Relatively few patches contribute disproportionately to connectivity, but top-ranked habitat patches are not included within the existing MPAs network, both at the Mediterranean scale and for most basins. The largest gaps for the source/sink role are in the Aegean and Ionian Sea, and largest gaps for the stepping stone role are in the Adriatic, Ionian and Tyrrhenian Sea.

Main Conclusions

Our results suggest that the current MPAs network fails to protect highly relevant patches of seagrass suitable areas in most of the Mediterranean basins. However, this gap could be filled by a few well-placed MPAs. Overall, we provide novel insights for the identification of key habitats and planning novel coastal MPAs in the region.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于网络的优先排序确定地中海海草栖息地保护方面的差距
目的 海草草甸是一个重要的海洋生态系统,具有重要的生物多样性。在实施保护措施时,往往没有考虑到栖息地之间的连通性。在本文中,我们根据地中海海草栖息地(Posidonia oceanica 和 Cymodocea nodosa)作为相关生物群落传播繁殖体的来源/滞留地和踏脚石的潜力,对其进行了预测和优先排序。我们利用这些信息来确定在保护排名靠前的栖息地方面存在的差距。 地点:地中海。 方法 我们将海草观测结果与海洋环境预测因素联系起来,运行物种分布模型,推断地中海海草的分布情况。然后,我们使用一种基于网络的方法(CONEFOR),根据海草对海景的贡献(包括海草区面积、作为繁殖源/保留地的潜力以及垫脚石)对海草适宜区进行排序。最后,通过将我们的排名与海洋保护区(MPAs)的空间分布进行对比,我们确定了地中海及其流域重要海草栖息地保护方面的潜在差距。 结果 大部分已确定的海草适宜区都未被纳入海洋保护区,仅在地中海西北部达到约 50% 的最大保护覆盖率。相对较少的斑块对连通性的贡献不成比例,但无论是在地中海范围还是在大多数流域,排名靠前的生境斑块都没有被纳入现有的海洋保护区网络。爱琴海和爱奥尼亚海的源/汇作用差距最大,亚得里亚海、爱奥尼亚海和第勒尼安海的台阶作用差距最大。 主要结论 我们的研究结果表明,目前的海洋保护区网络未能保护大多数地中海盆地中高度相关的海草适宜区。然而,这一空白可以通过几个位置合理的海洋保护区来填补。总之,我们为该地区关键栖息地的识别和新型沿海海洋保护区的规划提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover page Contrasting Patterns of Population Genomic Structure Between Broadcast-Spawning and Brooding Corals in Southeast Asia Issue Information Non-Native, Non-Naturalised Plants Suffer Less Herbivory Than Native Plants Across European Botanical Gardens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1