Casper Dueholm Vestergaard , Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm , Ludvig Paul Muren , Jintao Ren , Ole Nørrevang , Kenneth Jensen , Vicki Trier Taasti
{"title":"Proton dose calculation on cone-beam computed tomography using unsupervised 3D deep learning networks","authors":"Casper Dueholm Vestergaard , Ulrik Vindelev Elstrøm , Ludvig Paul Muren , Jintao Ren , Ole Nørrevang , Kenneth Jensen , Vicki Trier Taasti","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>Poor image quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images can hinder proton dose calculation to assess the influence of anatomy changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality and proton dose calculation accuracy of synthetic CTs generated from CBCT using unsupervised 3D deep-learning networks.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A total of 102 head-and-neck cancer patients were used to train (N=82) and test (N=20) i) a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network, ii) a contrastive unpaired translation, and iii) a fusion of the two (CycleCUT). For patients in the test set, a repeat CT was deformably registered to a same-day CBCT to create a ground-truth CT for comparison. The proton plan was re-calculated on the ground-truth CT and synthetic CTs. The image quality of the synthetic CTs was evaluated using peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index measure, mean error, and mean absolute error (MAE). Proton dose calculation accuracy was assessed through 3D gamma analysis and dose-volume-histogram parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All synthetic CTs accurately preserved the CBCT anatomy (verified by visual inspection) while improving the image quality. The CycleCUT network had slightly improved image quality compared to the other networks (MAE in body: 53 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 54/55 HU). All networks had similar proton dose calculation accuracy with gamma passing rate above 97%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All three evaluated networks generated synthetic CT images with dose distributions comparable to those of conventional fan-beam CT. The synthetic CT generation was fast, making all networks feasible for adaptive proton therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624001283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Purpose
Poor image quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images can hinder proton dose calculation to assess the influence of anatomy changes. The aim of this study was to evaluate image quality and proton dose calculation accuracy of synthetic CTs generated from CBCT using unsupervised 3D deep-learning networks.
Materials and methods
A total of 102 head-and-neck cancer patients were used to train (N=82) and test (N=20) i) a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network, ii) a contrastive unpaired translation, and iii) a fusion of the two (CycleCUT). For patients in the test set, a repeat CT was deformably registered to a same-day CBCT to create a ground-truth CT for comparison. The proton plan was re-calculated on the ground-truth CT and synthetic CTs. The image quality of the synthetic CTs was evaluated using peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index measure, mean error, and mean absolute error (MAE). Proton dose calculation accuracy was assessed through 3D gamma analysis and dose-volume-histogram parameters.
Results
All synthetic CTs accurately preserved the CBCT anatomy (verified by visual inspection) while improving the image quality. The CycleCUT network had slightly improved image quality compared to the other networks (MAE in body: 53 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 54/55 HU). All networks had similar proton dose calculation accuracy with gamma passing rate above 97%.
Conclusions
All three evaluated networks generated synthetic CT images with dose distributions comparable to those of conventional fan-beam CT. The synthetic CT generation was fast, making all networks feasible for adaptive proton therapy.