Enhancing soil water stability and retention through plastic mulching under atypical climatic conditions on the Chinese loess plateau

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109137
{"title":"Enhancing soil water stability and retention through plastic mulching under atypical climatic conditions on the Chinese loess plateau","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mulching is an agricultural practice that is extensively implemented worldwide to conserve water in soil to enhance agricultural production,and especially in the temperate continental monsoon climate regions. However, the mechanism controlling soil moisture evaporation, infiltration, and retention by mulching is unclear. We assess the impact of various mulching regimes on the soil–water equilibrium in the root zone of corn fields under atypical climate conditions(Excessive Precipitation) from 2020–2021 in five treatments: (1) ridges mulched with plastic film and furrows without mulching (RF), (2) conventional flat planting with full plastic mulching (FPM), (3) conventional flat planting with straw mulching (SM), (4) conventional flat planting with partial plastic mulching (PPM), and (5) conventional (control) flat planting with no mulching (CK). The HYDRUS-2D model was calibrated and validated using experimental data, to assess soil water content, water flux, and soil water balance within a two-dimensional soil profile. This model accurately replicated the root zone within the soil profile under all mulching scenarios, with numerical simulation outcomes closely aligning with observed measurements. Average R² values for FPM, PPM, RF, SM, and CK scenarios were 0.76, 0.75, 0.86, 0.85, and 0.77, respectively. During the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons, characterized by increased rainfall, plastic-covered treatments (FPM, PPM, RF) more efficiently reduced soil evaporation and enhanced soil-water retention. The combined soil drainage and storage changes for FPM, PPM, RF, and SM treatments exceeded those of CK by an average of 114.57, 64.93, 77.38, and 6.74 mm, respectively. FPM, PPM, and RF treatments had substantial water-retention capabilities during years of atypical climate. Notably, FPM ensured adequate water supply, facilitated deep soil water replenishment, and more effectively maintained soil water stability and retention. This underscores the pivotal regulatory function of mulching in mitigating the impacts of consecutive years of unusual climatic conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mulching is an agricultural practice that is extensively implemented worldwide to conserve water in soil to enhance agricultural production,and especially in the temperate continental monsoon climate regions. However, the mechanism controlling soil moisture evaporation, infiltration, and retention by mulching is unclear. We assess the impact of various mulching regimes on the soil–water equilibrium in the root zone of corn fields under atypical climate conditions(Excessive Precipitation) from 2020–2021 in five treatments: (1) ridges mulched with plastic film and furrows without mulching (RF), (2) conventional flat planting with full plastic mulching (FPM), (3) conventional flat planting with straw mulching (SM), (4) conventional flat planting with partial plastic mulching (PPM), and (5) conventional (control) flat planting with no mulching (CK). The HYDRUS-2D model was calibrated and validated using experimental data, to assess soil water content, water flux, and soil water balance within a two-dimensional soil profile. This model accurately replicated the root zone within the soil profile under all mulching scenarios, with numerical simulation outcomes closely aligning with observed measurements. Average R² values for FPM, PPM, RF, SM, and CK scenarios were 0.76, 0.75, 0.86, 0.85, and 0.77, respectively. During the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons, characterized by increased rainfall, plastic-covered treatments (FPM, PPM, RF) more efficiently reduced soil evaporation and enhanced soil-water retention. The combined soil drainage and storage changes for FPM, PPM, RF, and SM treatments exceeded those of CK by an average of 114.57, 64.93, 77.38, and 6.74 mm, respectively. FPM, PPM, and RF treatments had substantial water-retention capabilities during years of atypical climate. Notably, FPM ensured adequate water supply, facilitated deep soil water replenishment, and more effectively maintained soil water stability and retention. This underscores the pivotal regulatory function of mulching in mitigating the impacts of consecutive years of unusual climatic conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中国黄土高原的非典型气候条件下,通过塑料地膜覆盖提高土壤的稳水性和保水性
地膜覆盖是世界范围内广泛采用的一种农业耕作方式,目的是保持土壤中的水分以提高农业产量,尤其是在温带大陆性季风气候区。然而,地膜覆盖控制土壤水分蒸发、渗透和保持的机制尚不清楚。我们评估了 2020-2021 年非典型气候条件(降水过多)下不同地膜覆盖制度对玉米田根区土壤水分平衡的影响:(1)田埂覆盖塑料薄膜,沟内不覆盖地膜(RF);(2)常规平地种植,全塑料覆盖地膜(FPM);(3)常规平地种植,秸秆覆盖地膜(SM);(4)常规平地种植,部分塑料覆盖地膜(PPM);(5)常规(对照)平地种植,不覆盖地膜(CK)。利用实验数据对 HYDRUS-2D 模型进行了校准和验证,以评估二维土壤剖面中的土壤含水量、水通量和土壤水分平衡。该模型准确地复制了所有地膜覆盖情况下土壤剖面内的根区,数值模拟结果与观测测量结果非常吻合。FPM、PPM、RF、SM 和 CK 方案的平均 R² 值分别为 0.76、0.75、0.86、0.85 和 0.77。在降雨量增加的 2020 年和 2021 年生长季节,塑料覆盖处理(FPM、PPM、RF)更有效地减少了土壤蒸发,提高了土壤保水能力。FPM、PPM、RF 和 SM 处理的土壤排水和蓄水综合变化分别比 CK 处理平均高出 114.57、64.93、77.38 和 6.74 毫米。在气候不典型的年份,FPM、PPM 和 RF 处理具有很强的蓄水能力。值得注意的是,FPM 确保了充足的水分供应,促进了土壤深层水分的补充,并更有效地保持了土壤水分的稳定性和保持力。这凸显了覆盖物在减轻连续多年异常气候条件影响方面的关键调节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Projected impacts of climate change on global irrigation water withdrawals Influence of groundwater on the propagation of meteorological drought to agricultural drought during crop growth periods: A case study in Huaibei Plain Assessment of irrigation water use for dry beans in center pivots using ERA5 Land climate variables and Sentinel 2 NDVI time series in the Brazilian Cerrado Straw incorporation: A more effective coastal saline land reclamation approach to boost sunflower yield than straw mulching or burial The productivity anomalies and economic losses of different grassland ecosystems caused by flash drought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1