Dynamic Regret for Distributed Online Composite Optimization

IF 7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1109/TAC.2024.3489222
Ruijie Hou;Yang Yu;Xiuxian Li
{"title":"Dynamic Regret for Distributed Online Composite Optimization","authors":"Ruijie Hou;Yang Yu;Xiuxian Li","doi":"10.1109/TAC.2024.3489222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on online composite optimization over multiagent networks. In the distributed setting, each agent has its own local loss function, which consists of a convex, strongly convex or strongly convex and smooth function, and a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer. Two distributed online algorithms are proposed and corresponding dynamic regrets are analyzed. Two proposed algorithms are based on signs of relative states. The first algorithm obtains <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {O}(\\sqrt{T}(C_{T}+1))$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound when each local loss is a general convex composite function, where <inline-formula><tex-math>$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> is the path variation. If <inline-formula><tex-math>$C_{T}$</tex-math></inline-formula> can be estimated in advance for convex or strongly convex local loss with a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer, then dynamic regret bounds are, respectively, in the order of <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {O}(\\sqrt{T(C_{T}+1)})$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {O}(\\log T(1+C_{T}))$</tex-math></inline-formula>. The second algorithm is based on the first one, especially for handling the local loss composed of a strongly convex and smooth function with a nonsmooth regularizer, and then obtains <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\mathcal {O}(1+C_{T})$</tex-math></inline-formula> dynamic regret bound. In the end, numerical results are given to support the theoretical findings.","PeriodicalId":13201,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","volume":"70 5","pages":"3056-3071"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10740052/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on online composite optimization over multiagent networks. In the distributed setting, each agent has its own local loss function, which consists of a convex, strongly convex or strongly convex and smooth function, and a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer. Two distributed online algorithms are proposed and corresponding dynamic regrets are analyzed. Two proposed algorithms are based on signs of relative states. The first algorithm obtains $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T}(C_{T}+1))$ dynamic regret bound when each local loss is a general convex composite function, where $C_{T}$ is the path variation. If $C_{T}$ can be estimated in advance for convex or strongly convex local loss with a time-varying nonsmooth regularizer, then dynamic regret bounds are, respectively, in the order of $\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T(C_{T}+1)})$ and $\mathcal {O}(\log T(1+C_{T}))$. The second algorithm is based on the first one, especially for handling the local loss composed of a strongly convex and smooth function with a nonsmooth regularizer, and then obtains $\mathcal {O}(1+C_{T})$ dynamic regret bound. In the end, numerical results are given to support the theoretical findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分布式在线复合优化的动态遗憾
本文主要关注多智能体网络上的在线组合优化。在分布式环境下,每个智能体都有自己的局部损失函数,该局部损失函数由凸函数、强凸函数或强凸光滑函数和时变非光滑正则器组成。提出了两种分布式在线算法,并分析了相应的动态遗憾。提出了两种基于相对状态符号的算法。第一种算法在各局部损失为一般凸复合函数时得到$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T}(C_{T}+1))$动态遗憾界,其中$C_{T}$为路径变化量。如果使用时变非光滑正则化器可以提前估计出凸或强凸局部损失$C_{T}$,则动态后悔界分别为$\mathcal {O}(\sqrt{T(C_{T}+1)})$和$\mathcal {O}(\log T(1+C_{T}))$的顺序。第二种算法是在第一种算法的基础上,特别处理了由强凸光滑函数和非光滑正则器组成的局部损失,得到$\mathcal {O}(1+C_{T})$动态遗憾界。最后给出了数值结果来支持理论结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
824
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: In the IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, the IEEE Control Systems Society publishes high-quality papers on the theory, design, and applications of control engineering. Two types of contributions are regularly considered: 1) Papers: Presentation of significant research, development, or application of control concepts. 2) Technical Notes and Correspondence: Brief technical notes, comments on published areas or established control topics, corrections to papers and notes published in the Transactions. In addition, special papers (tutorials, surveys, and perspectives on the theory and applications of control systems topics) are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Consensus-Based SPSA Algorithm for Multisensor Multitarget Tracking Problem Improved Lyapunov Stability Criteria of Delay Systems and Application to Uncertain Complex Networks: New Uncertainty Estimation Method Tannenbaum's gain-margin optimization meets Polyak's heavy-ball algorithm Deception in Learning of Leader-Follower Games Communication-Efficient Distributed Online Nonconvex Optimization With Time-Varying Constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1