Narrow-band imaging offers a shorter menstrual bleeding time and a longer remission for hysteroscopic surgery in symptomatic post-cesarean scar diverticulum compared to white light.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1080/13645706.2024.2422830
Jiezhuang Huang, Shuang Liang, Ting Huang, Ziqian Wang, Zhifu Zhi
{"title":"Narrow-band imaging offers a shorter menstrual bleeding time and a longer remission for hysteroscopic surgery in symptomatic post-cesarean scar diverticulum compared to white light.","authors":"Jiezhuang Huang, Shuang Liang, Ting Huang, Ziqian Wang, Zhifu Zhi","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2024.2422830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel endoscopic imaging technology that improves the visibility of capillaries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NBI hysteroscopic excision in symptomatic post-cesarean scar diverticulum (PCSD) patients compared to conventional white light (WL) hysteroscopy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 73 patients with symptomatic PCSD between January 2014 and December 2018 were enrolled. The enrolled patients were stratified into NBI and WL groups according to whether they received NBI or WL hysteroscopy. Postoperative menstrual patterns at one, six, and 12 months after the operation were collected and compared between the NBI and WL groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 patients underwent NBI hysteroscopy (NBI group), while 41 patients received WL hysteroscopy (WL group). The symptom-free remission rates in the NBI group were significantly higher than in the WL group at six months and 12 months post-hysteroscopy. At the final follow-up, the menstrual bleeding duration in the NBI group was significantly shorter than in the WL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of NBI hysteroscopy in treating symptomatic PCSD resulted in shorter menstrual bleeding days and longer symptomatic remission compared to conventional WL hysteroscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2024.2422830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel endoscopic imaging technology that improves the visibility of capillaries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of NBI hysteroscopic excision in symptomatic post-cesarean scar diverticulum (PCSD) patients compared to conventional white light (WL) hysteroscopy.

Method: A total of 73 patients with symptomatic PCSD between January 2014 and December 2018 were enrolled. The enrolled patients were stratified into NBI and WL groups according to whether they received NBI or WL hysteroscopy. Postoperative menstrual patterns at one, six, and 12 months after the operation were collected and compared between the NBI and WL groups.

Results: A total of 32 patients underwent NBI hysteroscopy (NBI group), while 41 patients received WL hysteroscopy (WL group). The symptom-free remission rates in the NBI group were significantly higher than in the WL group at six months and 12 months post-hysteroscopy. At the final follow-up, the menstrual bleeding duration in the NBI group was significantly shorter than in the WL group.

Conclusion: The use of NBI hysteroscopy in treating symptomatic PCSD resulted in shorter menstrual bleeding days and longer symptomatic remission compared to conventional WL hysteroscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与白光相比,窄带成像可缩短月经出血时间,并延长症状性剖宫产后疤痕憩室宫腔镜手术的缓解时间。
背景:窄带成像(NBI)是一种新型内窥镜成像技术,可提高毛细血管的可见度。本研究旨在评估与传统白光(WL)宫腔镜相比,NBI宫腔镜切除术对症状性剖宫产术后瘢痕憩室(PCSD)患者的疗效:共纳入2014年1月至2018年12月期间的73例症状性PCSD患者。根据患者是否接受 NBI 或 WL 宫腔镜检查,将入组患者分为 NBI 组和 WL 组。收集术后1个月、6个月和12个月的月经模式,并在NBI组和WL组之间进行比较:结果:共有32名患者接受了NBI宫腔镜检查(NBI组),41名患者接受了WL宫腔镜检查(WL组)。在宫腔镜术后6个月和12个月,NBI组的无症状缓解率明显高于WL组。在最后的随访中,NBI组的月经出血时间明显短于WL组:结论:与传统的WL宫腔镜相比,使用NBI宫腔镜治疗有症状的PCSD可缩短月经出血天数,延长症状缓解时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic cardiac mucosal ligation: a novel minimally invasive procedure for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The effect of peritoneal flap fixation with curling technique on postoperative lymphocele formation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Right mini-thoracotomy for concomitant aortic valve replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft. Three-dimensional semiquantitative evaluation of reactive emphysema in magnesium implant models. Clash of the Titans: the first multi-center retrospective comparative study between da Vinci and Hugo RAS surgical systems for the treatment of deep endometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1