Depression Treatment Trajectories and Associated Social Determinants: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study in 66,540 Older Adults Undergoing First-Time Depression Treatment in Denmark

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1002/gps.70006
Kazi Ishtiak-Ahmed, Christopher Rohde, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Christiane Gasse
{"title":"Depression Treatment Trajectories and Associated Social Determinants: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study in 66,540 Older Adults Undergoing First-Time Depression Treatment in Denmark","authors":"Kazi Ishtiak-Ahmed,&nbsp;Christopher Rohde,&nbsp;Ole Köhler-Forsberg,&nbsp;Kaj Sparle Christensen,&nbsp;Christiane Gasse","doi":"10.1002/gps.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to describe depression treatment patterns, identify unique trajectory groups using a group-based trajectory approach, and explore associated social determinants in older adults undergoing first-time depression treatment during a 3-year follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This Danish register-based cohort study included all adults aged ≥ 65 who initiated depression treatment by redeeming first-time antidepressant prescriptions (no prescriptions in the last 10 years) between 2006 and 2015. The outcome of interest during the 2-year follow-up was depression treatment, assessed as antidepressant prescriptions redemptions and psychiatric hospital contacts for depression. Latent class growth analyses were applied to model treatment trajectories during 3 years. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to analyze adjusted associations between social determinates and trajectory group membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 66,540 older adults (55.2% females, mean age: 77.3 years), we identified three distinct groups with unique patterns of depression treatment trajectories: ‘brief-treatment’ where individuals stopped depression treatment within 6 months (33.7%); ‘gradual-withdrawal’ (26.5%) where treatment was gradually stopped over 2 years; and ‘persistent-treatment’ where individuals continued depression treatment for the entire 3 years (39.8%). Females, single-person households, and residents of less-urbanized regions were associated with higher odds of membership in the ‘persistent-treatment’ group, while older age, widowhood or separation, and non-Danish ethnicities were associated with lower odds.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Three distinct patterns of depression treatment trajectories were identified in older adults, indicating differential clinical courses of depression—potentially influenced by social determinants, including sex, marital status, urban residence, and ethnicity. Early patient stratification and targeted interventions are crucial in depression care for older adults.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to describe depression treatment patterns, identify unique trajectory groups using a group-based trajectory approach, and explore associated social determinants in older adults undergoing first-time depression treatment during a 3-year follow-up.

Methods

This Danish register-based cohort study included all adults aged ≥ 65 who initiated depression treatment by redeeming first-time antidepressant prescriptions (no prescriptions in the last 10 years) between 2006 and 2015. The outcome of interest during the 2-year follow-up was depression treatment, assessed as antidepressant prescriptions redemptions and psychiatric hospital contacts for depression. Latent class growth analyses were applied to model treatment trajectories during 3 years. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to analyze adjusted associations between social determinates and trajectory group membership.

Results

Among the 66,540 older adults (55.2% females, mean age: 77.3 years), we identified three distinct groups with unique patterns of depression treatment trajectories: ‘brief-treatment’ where individuals stopped depression treatment within 6 months (33.7%); ‘gradual-withdrawal’ (26.5%) where treatment was gradually stopped over 2 years; and ‘persistent-treatment’ where individuals continued depression treatment for the entire 3 years (39.8%). Females, single-person households, and residents of less-urbanized regions were associated with higher odds of membership in the ‘persistent-treatment’ group, while older age, widowhood or separation, and non-Danish ethnicities were associated with lower odds.

Conclusions

Three distinct patterns of depression treatment trajectories were identified in older adults, indicating differential clinical courses of depression—potentially influenced by social determinants, including sex, marital status, urban residence, and ethnicity. Early patient stratification and targeted interventions are crucial in depression care for older adults.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症治疗轨迹及相关社会决定因素:丹麦首次接受抑郁症治疗的 66540 名老年人的三年随访研究》。
目的:本研究旨在描述抑郁症的治疗模式,使用基于群体的轨迹方法识别独特的轨迹群体,并探索首次接受抑郁症治疗的老年人在三年随访期间的相关社会决定因素:本研究旨在描述抑郁症的治疗模式,使用基于群体的轨迹方法识别独特的轨迹群体,并在为期 3 年的随访中探讨首次接受抑郁症治疗的老年人的相关社会决定因素:这项基于丹麦登记册的队列研究纳入了所有年龄≥65岁、在2006年至2015年期间通过兑换首次抗抑郁药处方(过去10年中没有处方)开始接受抑郁治疗的成年人。2 年随访期间的关注结果是抑郁症治疗情况,评估指标是抗抑郁药处方的兑换情况和因抑郁症入住精神病院的情况。采用潜类增长分析来模拟 3 年间的治疗轨迹。多项式逻辑回归分析用于分析调整后的社会决定因素与轨迹组成员之间的关联:在 66,540 名老年人(55.2% 为女性,平均年龄为 77.3 岁)中,我们发现了三个具有独特抑郁治疗轨迹模式的不同群体:"短暂治疗",即在 6 个月内停止抑郁治疗(33.7%);"渐进-退出"(26.5%),即在 2 年内逐渐停止治疗;以及 "持续治疗",即在整个 3 年中持续进行抑郁治疗(39.8%)。女性、单人家庭和城市化程度较低地区的居民属于 "持续治疗 "组的几率较高,而年龄较大、丧偶或分居以及非丹麦族裔的人属于 "持续治疗 "组的几率较低:结论:在老年人中发现了三种不同的抑郁症治疗轨迹模式,表明抑郁症的临床过程存在差异,这可能受到性别、婚姻状况、城市居住地和种族等社会决定因素的影响。早期对患者进行分层和有针对性的干预对老年人的抑郁症治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
期刊最新文献
Depression Treatment Trajectories and Associated Social Determinants: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study in 66,540 Older Adults Undergoing First-Time Depression Treatment in Denmark Real-World Use of Trazodone in Older Persons in Long Term Care Setting: A Retrospective Study Issue Information Association Between Organizational Context and Resident Pain in Assisted Living: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study Impact of Neuropsychological Assessment on Subjective Memory Complaints in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1